Azalin

Judging by a few of the threads started over the last couple days, I'd say it apparently isn't difficult at all.

Solomonders?

Democrat combat zones? He'd probably be a lot safer visiting Iraq or Afghanistan.

Next time he talks? Hell, the only time I see his drivel is when someone quotes him.

It's also put a new spin on the term "echo chamber", among other things. I'll admit, I've had to do a fair amount of reading up on the history of the various peoples of that whole region just to get some kind of perspective. Regardless of the history of both slavery and apartheid, I don't see how forcibly removing people from their property and confiscating their wealth is justifiable under the circumstances, and Malema's "We have not called for the killing of white people, at least for now" should wake a lot of people up as to the severity of what appears about to happen in SA. I can't think of any other time in my life when there's been a possibility of a wave of English-speaking, white refugees flooding anyone's borders.

A lot of accuracy in just a few short sentences.

Now that's not entirely fair. One would need to have nuts in order to know that they've been kicked. The modern progressive male was voluntarily emasculated a generation ago.

I already looked at that, but thanks for sharing.

Holy crap - I knew there was a growing anti-white movement in South Africa, but I never realized it had become so bad this quickly. Yep. I'm not certain that's the case. Just because it's the African continent, doesn't mean the blacks of South Africa are historically indigenous. I know many were brought in as slaves, but I can't find anything yet that gives specifics about who lived there when the Dutch first colonized. So far, if I try to go back any further, all I get is Australopithecus.

I am, thanks. I actually had a fairly lengthy reply mostly finished and accidentally nuked it. So in brief: Most of us here were not originally Trump supporters. In fact, I can only think of one person who still posts here that actually was pro-Trump while there were still others vying for the Republican nomination. I did not consider myself as supporting Trump, rather vehemently opposing Hillary. Many others here did the same. I only bring this up because many of the people you've locked horns with are not long-time Trumpists. Some are neither Republican nor conservative. We may come off as a pack of sycophants from your point of view, but that's not the case. Go back 20-24 pages in this forum and read for yourself - some of it is pretty funny, actually. My only real contention with your argument is that Brennan has had his security clearance revoked for what seems like a sound reason to me. Add to that, he is now in the employ of a hyper-critical news organization, and he now becomes an inside track for sensitive information that can do far more than just put the president in a bad light. Doubly alarming to me is the cry that Brennan's constitutional freedom of speech is being violated, which makes no sense to me. In fact, I don't fully understand why anyone no longer in the employ of the federal government has any reason to have access to contemporary, classified information.

I suggest that you're clinging to preconceived notions with increasing desperation, and you react by reiterating the same preconceived notions with increasing desperation? I'm not talking at all about Comey or the Russians - that crap is being discussed in a different thread. This is about Brennan and his security clearance being revoked, and the reason for that happening. The material is all there for you to review for yourself, should you choose to. If you decide to ignore that information, fine. Don't expect anyone to consider your attempts at discussion to be serious though. And what have I said in this thread that makes my previous post 'the height of hypocrisy'? With regard to your final paragraph - drama doesn't earn you points, but if it helps you feel like you've disengaged with a semblance of dignity, then by all means....

That assessment is both incorrect and unfair. Nobody discussing any of this with you is listening to 'the voices' in their heads, they are trying to get you to think for yourself and let go of preconceived notions that you're very obviously clinging to with increasing desperation. That majority of folks that you refer to are the people who are so disengaged that they can't even tell you who their own congressional representative is, so I would tell you that they don't begin to care enough about the sanctity of our democracy.

'these immigrants from China are coming over and taking our community from us.' Further, she said it 'disgusts her seeing black people holding signs for these Asians and not supporting their own people.'" No, that's not racist at all.

Wait - Steve? Gone? Damn, he still owed me five bucks. Oh, well. RIP.

An incredible voice, a tremendous loss. Rest in peace.

Why don't you just stop it with all the bull$%#@ and find something better to do than troll people? Grow the %^#$ up and get a job, or a girlfriend, or subscribe to a porn site, or something... If you were original, creative or funny, then you'd be adding to the board. But you don't. Because you're not. You're not even good at trolling - you're light years behind Tiberius, and unless he suffers another brain injury, you always will be. You are worthless.

Because of the bovines, or the regalia?

Obviously, he was trying everything he could to provoke the cop. I'm just saying that he'd better have a camera close by every time he goes out into public.

There's definitely a few cops out there that would love to pull him over. Woe be it for him if that ever happens.

Yep. That's exactly what I'd do if I was in charge.

I'm impressed. All that intellect, and maturity too.

Trump wasn't a conscientious objector. He was dismissed for physical reasons. Whether those reasons were valid or not, that's a different question. Trump wasn't a conscientious objector. Mohamed Ali was, and I see nobody talking **** about that. I turned 18 in November of 1975, and never bothered to register for the draft, since the draft was going to end in less than two months. I remember my dad, who served in the army for a couple years after the Korean conflict ended, telling me that if my home is ever invaded, that I need to fight with everything I have to defend it. He also said that if I was drafted to go fight in the jungles of Asia in a political war, that he would support my fleeing to Canada. You leftists that try to paint Trump as a conscientious objector are wrong. No surprise there - you're wrong so often that you ought to be used to it. You far right idiots that try to paint Trump as being treasonous, you're just as $%@#ing stupid. Buy a $#@%ing dictionary, for crying out loud. Just because someone doesn't want to die in some God forsaken jungle in Vietnam and they use whatever resource they're lucky enough to have to avoid it.....you call that treason? Really? Think again, and get the $#%# over yourself, dickwad.

You won't be making that mistake again!

Indeed. I'd guess anywhere between zero and two news outlets run this, including all the details, in the next seven days. And that's a hell of a lot better than Pete Townsend got.