Jump to content

mannc

Community Member
  • Posts

    17,689
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by mannc

  1. I think they traded up because they thought that Oakland was going to take him.

    Reminds me a lot of the trade up for Poz when David Harris was still there and would have been available in the Bills' slot. A panic move.

     

    So you have a problem giving up two fourths for (essentially) a 1st round talent?

     

    I think you're using new math or something.

    He was apparently not a first round talent. Otherwise, he would have been drafted yesterday. And there is no reason to believe he would not have been there at 49, or that he will be better than Josh Perry, for that matter. We gave away two 4th round picks, just like we gave away a 4th round pick for Bryce Brown.
  2. You certainly implied it. Lots of QBs on ultra talented teams had good records - those 10 wins don't mean much in terms of evaluating Jones as a NFL prospect.

    But you suggested that his physical skills alone don't mean much. I simply pointed out that he has a track record of using those skills to win football games. If having great physical skills and winning football games at QB aren't enough in your book, what is?

  3. again, you do not know that either. What pro teams do is communicate and then take the risk. They surely know better then you or I do as to what teams had their eye upon.

     

    i guess simpler said it may have been, OMG he fell this far, don't let him get picked up. Bills really liked him all along from what i have read

    At best, they were playing a hunch. That's fine if you are moving up for a QB or a difference maker at a premium position. We are talking about an inside linebacker. It's the type of move up that foolish teams make and smart teams take advantage of.

    Didn't those 5 teammates that were picked in round 1 and Michael Thomas (r2) and soon-to-be-picked Braxton Miller and Von Bell have anything to do with those 10 wins?

    Did I ever say they didn't?

  4. Bradford, Kaepernick, and Fitzy are all playing a losing game where rafter last night, they are losing leverage by the minute. If Fitzy really wants to retire, ok, but if it's a tactic, all of them may get the short end of the stick.

    Yes, but their leverage will start to rise again when QBs around the league arrive at training camps, playing in (meaningless) preseason games, and start dropping like flies. Happens every year.

  5. It appears like the difference between #49 and #32 is a third round pick. What do you guys think? I'm down with it if he doesn't need micro. I mean Shaq and Jack in our front 7, and then 2 4ths, 5th and 2 6ths-sounds pretty darn good.

    Gee, assuming Jack is healthy, you don't think any other teams have the same idea, do you? I'm guessing the real value of Cleveland's pick is a lot higher than what any "trade value chart" says it is.

  6. It's a risky procedure. If it's a "he must have it in the coming year" situation, he's probably darn near as risky as jaylon. If it's a "he will last a few years" he should go quick.

     

    The 2 things I've really tried to push in his threads are micro fracture is a really rough procedure, and you have to trust your Medicals (and not rumors or fan opinion or...)

    Here in Portland, the procedure is known as "Greg Oden Surgery".
  7.  

    Ok, since it appears that some things were somewhat overlooked, let me go back and reiterate on a few things.

     

    WEAKNESSES: Elongated delivery. Struggles with accuracy on deep passes. Lacks great mobility that is increasingly valued in the NFL.

    That's three huge areas of concern, delivery, deep accuracy and lacks mobility. Then you have to take into consideration that he was playing behind an elite offensive line that gave him time to throw and that simply won't be the case in the NFL.

     

    So, if you are looking to draft the opposite of Tyrod Taylor then have at it. There are real reasons as to why Hogan has a 5th to 6th round grade. Guys like him are huge projects that have very slim odds of working out.

     

    There are legitimate concerns about Hogan, but lack of mobility is definitely not one of them. He is a highly mobile QB, especially for his size. This is backed up by his 40 times, his rushing statistics, and the fact that even in its pro-set offense, Stanford regularly called designed runs for him. Anyone who watched more than a few Stanford games over the past four years knows that Hogan's mobility is a strength rather than a limitation. He reminds me a lot of Andrew Luck in that regard.

×
×
  • Create New...