Jump to content

mannc

Community Member
  • Posts

    18,040
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by mannc

  1. I can’t remember Josh having this much time to throw…they haven’t even gotten close to him.
  2. Jones is toast if they get down three scores and have to pass.
  3. It’s why they are winless in close games.
  4. 2d and goal on the one…three drop back passes in a row🤣🤣🤣
  5. This team just repeatedly fails to make big plays when they are needed.
  6. If that’s true, it got to be a late addition to the covid list, right? Lines don’t move that much late in the week absent new injury/availability news…
  7. I was just using WEO’s numbers…I don’t know what the actual chances are. This is true, but a Pack FG wins the game if you tie it with a one-point conversion or succeed on a two-point try.
  8. Come on, WEO. A 50% chance of winning the game on one play is better than a 95% chance of tying it, following by an OT in which your chance of winning is no better than 50% right? That would mean the kick followed by OT decision would result in a win 47.5% of the time, vs. 50% chance of winning by going for the two point conversion. No matter how many "downs" you get, your chance of winning in OT isn't above than 50% right?
  9. So, to be clear, you do understand that McKenzie's never been "benched" as the Bills' slot receiver, right?
  10. Wait, are you talking about McKenzie being replaced as the kick returner when the discussion was about him filling in for Beasley at slot WR? Try being less insulting...
  11. But we were discussing his role as a slot receiver, not as a return man.
  12. McKenzie’s never been the starter, so I’m not sure how you can say he was “benched”.
  13. McKenzie has played very well in the slot when given a chance. We'll be fine...
  14. According to your math, Harbaugh made the right call...
  15. Gotta factor in chance of missed kick…I know, Tucker almost never misses those, but still…
  16. If it’s a “single play that 50/50 loses the game”, how is that any worse than kicking the extra point and going to OT? That means it’s a play that 50/50 wins the game, too. Why do you think the Ravens would have had a better than 50/50 chance to win in OT? Not to get off-track, but I’d trade McDermott for Frank Reich, too.
  17. Really? You are certain that the Ravens would have won both those games in overtime? How do you know that? For that matter, how do you even know the kicker makes both the one-point conversions?
  18. I was with you until your last two words. No one ruined Darnold other than Darnold. He sucks.
  19. Did they do that? I thought he was picked later…he looks like he might turn out ok. He’s got nothing around him right now but bad coaching…
  20. He’s fast though; I’ll give him that. Both these coaches are
  21. Under these new protocols, would Dawkins have been able to play vs. Carolina? Does it mean he's available for NE, unless symptomatic?
  22. You can say that again...
  23. I can tell you’re just a “glass half-full” kinda guy😄
×
×
  • Create New...