Doc

LOL! Yet you make up a definition, or more precisely parrot the definition from Dem talking points, of "human trafficking." And don't make me laugh with the 2nd paragraph. You're as ignorant as they come. Which is how they want you.

Dodson was outstanding? That’s the first time I’ve heard anyone say that.

Right, because Israel wanted children and babies to be killed/burned alive/beheaded, is that right? Ain't that the truth. See above.

OK John.

RIP BLM. And good riddance.

Filthy Harry: "it work[ed], didn't it?"

Good question. The Israeli embassy seems to be doing just fine without the token appointment.

Of course they don't. Need those human shields... IOW they're going to intervene. Shocker.

Again the only reason they have a problem with it is because it exposes the disaster this incompetent Admin's border policy has been and the terrible consequences it imposes on places that have to deal with the massive number of illegals. It was all ***** and giggles when it was border towns/cities in Texas being overrun because, hahah, it's Texas. Start busting budgets in NYC, Chicago, MV and elsewhere and it's "human trafficking!" and a lot of lip service about how they're not for open borders, while they do nothing about it.

My bad, you did make that ridiculous assertion. So I guess the answer to my question would be "no." And Iran has never directly attacked Isreal. They do it through proxies...like Hamas. They don't want to risk the ire of the US. Like it appears below... The fact that no one listened to the call for Jihad yesterday suggests that no one is taking Hamas seriously (anymore). It would be great if Iran decided not to participate but imma wait on that one.

So you're saying Hamas, who rules Gaza, and Iran who backs them, don't want to see the destruction of Israel?

I wasn't speaking for you as you have no effect on what goes on there.

It's got to be a talking point of theirs.

Yup. Like I said, it's a turf war and both sides want more. Except that Israel appears to be willing to co-exist while the Muslims want them eradicated/all the land.

Obviously living under a bridge in El Paso is what they always dreamed of...

The Bills are definitely worse at cheating...

It was never going to be enough.

Or on their thousands of miles journey from their 3rd world countries to the US.

Not sure, but even they don't want them.

Glad to see the call for a day of Jihad was a complete bust. That's incredibly embarrassing for Hamas.

Bingo. They're embarrassed that their party's open border policy is the shitshow the Repubs said it would be. So they have to call it "human trafficking" to (in some warped way) deflect the blame for their party's incompetence, if not willful criminality in not securing the border. As if that will somehow get them off the hook, much less solve the problem by sending them where they want. Meanwhile they pay lip service to not supporting an open border but don't demand their party do anything to change it. It's always "we need to fix a broken immigration system..." and nothing more. And these people somehow managed to scrape together the money to make the expensive (for them, the cartels aren't doing this for free) trek from their faraway countries, endured horrific conditions and treatment...yet sending them to "sanctuary cities" is terrible? LOL! No, the reason they bristle at it is because the "stunt" proved what Repubs were saying: that we can't keep allowing this because it's "destroying" the country. Yet nothing is being done despite so-called sanctuary cities crying poverty.

Let the Muslim countries take them.

What a clown. I guess the transgender lobby pays quite well...

It's truly frightening. I mean on American college campuses you have Muslim groups openly talking about killing Jews and eradicating Israel.

That's impeachment #2 should Joke continue to run in 2024.