Doc

I would think democrats would reject joke by now. Dude lost them the house, will be impeached twice if he stays in the race and embarrassed our nation and taken it into the toilet.

Yeah, sending them to places that won't deport them is terrible. Much less American cities, which are infinitely better than the places from which they are seeking "asylum." Meanwhile, here is the definition of "human trafficking:"

No, I call you out for being a wacky moron. And no one except for Muslims are calling for genocide.

The nervousness in her smile and the look she gives him at :07 says it all.

This.

The Dems are in lock-step and have been thoroughly incompetent. They had both Houses and the Presidency for the 1st 2 years of Joke's term and the country is a mess. Not being able to pick a Speaker for a few weeks isn't going to change what people already know about the current Admin and where Dems are trying to take this country.

I agree about them making allegations and then trying to prove it didn't happen. I mean just look at Russian collusion and all the simps who still believe it. But I doubt anyone takes him out. There's been ample opportunity over the past 7+ years.

LOL! Yet you make up a definition, or more precisely parrot the definition from Dem talking points, of "human trafficking." And don't make me laugh with the 2nd paragraph. You're as ignorant as they come. Which is how they want you.

Dodson was outstanding? That’s the first time I’ve heard anyone say that.

Right, because Israel wanted children and babies to be killed/burned alive/beheaded, is that right? Ain't that the truth. See above.

OK John.

RIP BLM. And good riddance.

Filthy Harry: "it work[ed], didn't it?"

Good question. The Israeli embassy seems to be doing just fine without the token appointment.

Of course they don't. Need those human shields... IOW they're going to intervene. Shocker.

Again the only reason they have a problem with it is because it exposes the disaster this incompetent Admin's border policy has been and the terrible consequences it imposes on places that have to deal with the massive number of illegals. It was all ***** and giggles when it was border towns/cities in Texas being overrun because, hahah, it's Texas. Start busting budgets in NYC, Chicago, MV and elsewhere and it's "human trafficking!" and a lot of lip service about how they're not for open borders, while they do nothing about it.

My bad, you did make that ridiculous assertion. So I guess the answer to my question would be "no." And Iran has never directly attacked Isreal. They do it through proxies...like Hamas. They don't want to risk the ire of the US. Like it appears below... The fact that no one listened to the call for Jihad yesterday suggests that no one is taking Hamas seriously (anymore). It would be great if Iran decided not to participate but imma wait on that one.

So you're saying Hamas, who rules Gaza, and Iran who backs them, don't want to see the destruction of Israel?

I wasn't speaking for you as you have no effect on what goes on there.

It's got to be a talking point of theirs.

Yup. Like I said, it's a turf war and both sides want more. Except that Israel appears to be willing to co-exist while the Muslims want them eradicated/all the land.

Obviously living under a bridge in El Paso is what they always dreamed of...

The Bills are definitely worse at cheating...

It was never going to be enough.

Or on their thousands of miles journey from their 3rd world countries to the US.