Doc

LOL! If anything, they don't make injury excuses/disclosures. Which could get them in trouble with the league.

You know, I could understand if the Dems and their minions disavowed Slick after #metoo and then after their attacks on Trump for his "grab her by the..." thing, but they not only didn't do that, they kept trotting him out to campaign for them. Then I saw that clip of Jon Stewart on TDS (how fitting) talking about Biden fondling the new interns. That's why I laugh every time they bring up the "cheater" and "rapist" stuff.

It was his own son. And his (at least) 2nd wife.

Not sure if you're talking about hesitancy here because Bishop has 4.45 speed. Which is understandable since he was behind the 8-ball after missing almost all of training camp and all of pre-season recovering from a broken scapula.

Going into the season last year they kept 11 DBs: 7 CBs and 4 Ss. One of them (Codrington) was just a returner and offered little at CB, playing only late in the season when the outcomes were decided. Right now on the roster there are only 4 Ss (Rapp, Bishop, Forrest and Hamlin), and while they say they're going to (also) play Hancock there, he is just a rookie. I think they (may be forced to) keep them all. At CB is where it gets interesting. If they keep 7 again, I would say it's because they plan on keeping Codrington, again. That means that there are 10 players (not counting Te'Cory Couch or the UDFAs) vying for 6 spots. I'd say Benford, Hairston, Johnson and White are locks, with Hancock being a likely bet. That leaves 1 spot open. I think they can cut Jackson, Lewis and Ingram with minimal dead cap hit (less than $800K) and chance of losing them. They can be put on the PS. That leaves 1 spot for Hardy or Strong. Unless they keep 7 CBs without Codrington.

Met several nurses who were freaks in my time. Best to stay away.

The early 90's called... And what shithole district rules someone raped someone else without any proof?

Hegseth isn't going anywhere. Waltz took the fall for Wong's error.

See 10 to 12 posts earlier...

I think the difference is who was throwing to Hollins versus who was throwing to Moore.

Continue? LOL! Let me know the first time it happens...

We're losing because morons like you voted for Biden and his weak policies. Calling you dumb would be a compliment.

He spoke to guys who drink Bud Light while watching football.

It was they who accidentally added Goldberg, right? Seems drastic to let them go for what turned out to be a harmless mistake but hey, the Dems wanted accountability, right? Unfortunately for them it wasn't the guy they demanded to be fired.

I'd say only because he also returns punts. But if Shenault can do it, or another player can, I think that what he offers at his position gives him the edge over Codrington and he had a higher KR average with a return TD.

The Eagles didn’t win the Super Bowl because of their two elite wide receivers. Their defense shut down the Chiefs. And the addition of Saquon Barkley transformed the offense.

Read 8 and 10 posts earlier.

Not sure many players' wrists are surviving direct helmet shot like Poyer laid on Coleman.

I think his talent was greatest in college. In the pros he's more of a Mack Hollins type who can return kicks and can hopefully return punts (or someone else with value at another position can do it).

Just to clarify, you're saying that Hawes was an odd pick by the Bills?

Moore is a lock. As for Shenault, I looked it up and Codrington played just 69 snaps on defense last year, only in the regular season, mostly in the final 2 games (and in the 2nd half of both, when the game was out of reach against the Jets and they didn't care against the Patriots). I'd say Shenault offers more at WR and returner than Codrington offers at CB and returner. The only thing is Shenault hasn't returned punts in his career and may have to prove he can also do it.

Yeah but the Patriots will get a comp pick.

Sorry but it's not even close to "unequivocally." If that were true...the mission wouldn't have been a complete success.

Well I guess that ends that "scandal." And pales in comparison to the Dems and MSM covering for a demented President.

Why?