Doc

Yeah. You'd think they'd be loving Joke, what with their stock portfolios doing great and working all those part-time jobs...

And he says he wants to debate Trump. Shyeah, right!

Ah, so, from nowhere. Got it. Yeah, no, your brain isn't fine. Just a couple pages ago you said "100 American casualties." Now you're saying there wasn't even 1 casualty, they were brain injuries and 70% have returned to work? Again, if there was any proof that Trump knew where they were going to attack and allowed it, he would have been strung-up by now. You know it, I know it and everyone knows it. They're not "waiting" for some magical moment to whip it out.

WTF are you getting "isolationism"? Is that a new Dem talking point?

No chance also.

How'd that happen?

Good move. It's not going to go in their favor.

Making bomb threats is stupid. But the fact is that anyone who says/does anything controversial, no matter what side of the political aisle, gets them.

Yup. He sucked but wanted to be paid like a starter. And the circus that followed him made him even less worth having around.

How anyone can actually claim that there weren't significantly fewer illegals entering under Trump is mind-boggling. It's not even worth engaging with these people anymore.

No chance.

That's because he pretended to be one when he ran.

How about watching it and finding out? I think that's the point of what most have been saying. I guess that "overcharge," er, "reset" button ddn't work...

Sorry, I'll need to see proof of this. Your memory has already proven to be suspect with the "100 dead, no wait, it was 34 with brain injuries." If you think Russia is done, what about Ukraine? I think they're now conscripting old people and women.

The entire Soros family needs to wind up in prison.

If public schools are the "glue that holds our communities together," it explains a lot...

Looks like Gis was sticking-it-out hoping John would die or relinquish his seat and she would take it.

So it went from 100 dead troops to 34 with brain injuries? And they told Trump where they were going to strike and he said "OK"? Again, if that were true, it would be plastered everywhere.

We're fine with your opinion, but it's certainly no fact. The only fact we can be sure of is Putin didn't invade under Trump, but did under his predecessor and successor. Typically you invade when someone is weak... First of all, Iran retaliated for the killing of Soleimani. Trump didn't "allow" anything. As for the strikes killing soldiers, show us the article. Again if it were true, it would be everywhere. And why would Israel be unhappy with Trump for absolving them of blame for killing Soleimani? And if they are, so what? They pulled-out at the last second.

I think NATO is a good idea. Many locations from which to launch nukes is a pretty good deterrent. But they do need the US more than we need them and Trump knew that and that's why he threatened to pull out if they didn't pay more, which he knew they would.

I'm going to laugh when women's sports are dominated by non-women. Mostly because Dem men and women were too afraid to say anything. Because it's not a cult...

I know. Which is why it then inevitably changes to "well he didn't need to invade because he was doing Putin' bidding by trying to destroy NATO."

No, we're saying that if they were "buddies," Putin would have definitely invaded Ukraine because Trump wouldn't have stopped it. Yeah that interview doesn't say anything remotely close to what you are claiming. Because if it did...it was be all over the news. And actually instead of throwing Israel under the bus, he took total responsibility for killing Soleimani. Everyone (including Iran and they were pissed) thought Israel was also in on it.

To paraphrase Iron Mike: "Everyone's got a belief...'til they get punched in the mouf."

Again you'd think the time for Putin to invade Ukraine would be when he has his "puppet" in Office who is "trying to destroy NATO."