leh-nerd skin-erd

What’s “common” and “good” varies based on ones perspective. What we are up to now is it is not a crime, just something that you don’t like. As I said when we started here, you’re unhappy that people don’t see things your way. Get in line.

Is an “institutional crime” a crime from a legal perspective, or just something you like to say? You lost me with “just imagine…” and then referenced something that wasn’t a crime crime.

There is no allegation of a crime here, there is only a debate over how to make our elections as secure as possible. Dialogue is good!! Together Everyone Achieves More!

Ugh, this Eddie Munster wannabe should hide his head in shame—Biden made him look like a scared little boy in their debate. Totally unprepared, . Of course that was way back in the day when Biden’s bare knuckles style was in favor, before Trump Bidened old man Biden in their debates.

I agree, we won’t agree. Like you, I won’t surrender points that are a matter of public record in favor of rhetoric that makes no sense to me. Trump was imperfect in his handling of the virus. He said things that in retrospect made little sense, were most definitely articulated in a way that exposed his throat to media and political enemies, and was definitely impacted by the learning curve associated with pandemic management. Still, his focus changed and his approach did as well. In large part, what he said and did was irrelevant because 90m + Americans weren’t listening to him anyways based on unfounded accusations of Russian collusion for the 4 years prior. That said, he was criticized by his political enemies for attempting to lock potential carriers out, he supported recovery efforts vocally and with money, temporary hospitals, supplies and the like. He aligned with businesses that could speed recovery efforts, brought them together on a national public stage and encouraged/strong-armed participation on an unprecedented level. For that, he was maligned—constantly, repetitively, relentlessly—by his political enemies including many large progressive media outlets which caused people —-apolitical, conservatives, democrats and independents—— to question the trustworthiness of the US Government in fighting the pandemic. Sadly, it worked perfectly. Respectfully—because I like you—-rattling off any bullshyt that does not recognize the fundamental and crucial role of the Trump administration in the development of the vaccine that will save the world makes you look petty and small-minded. As for the Canadian government, instead of lobbing emotionally vapid water balloons at the US response, perhaps one might wonder what the Provincial brain trust was doing when they lost a d*ck-measuring fight over “patent disputes” to the companies that make the shyt that keep the people alive during, uh pandemics. Where the hell has leadership been since 2006?? There’s your trouble. The “Trump for the rich” story is stale, old and cumbersome. It’s boring, and it’s the shtick liberal and progressives use to bolster their base. The truly interesting part for me is how they then juxtapose Trump with a lifer like Biden, a guy extraordinarily well-positioned to help the little people for 50 damn years but...hasn’t. Biden is no genius, indeed, but damn he’s made boatloads of cash for him and his by fooling people just like you. In that regard he’s pretty damn smart. But hey, maybe this time and if not, maybe after re-election when blow dries his wig with an egg beater. Finally, the record is clear on the positioning of the current democrat leadership in this country on pandemic management last year. “Don’t trust the vaccine. Don’t trust Trump. Protest loud and proud while we lock life for the compliant down tight af. All this did was spread the virus, add to the millions infected, and spike the death count. I’ve said it before, I’ll say it again—-Death and disease were good for the Biden campaign in 2020.

Are you trying to out-Confucius me??? Ah hell no! Using your analogy, you’ve conveniently ignored innings 1-4, where most of one team played by the rules of survival as outlined by the informationally erratic Dr Fauci, while hundreds of thousands completely disregarded said rules, and undoubtedly brought the Vid back to some of the most at-risk communities in our nation. I can only speculate how low our death count might have been if not for the well-intentioned but woefully misguided protestors causing da spread. Your analogy ignores the perils of inning 5, where former super Covid healer Cuomo screwed the pooch about as badly as it’s possible to screw a pooch, lied about it and got away with it. He closed down New Rochelle but lacked the sack to cordon off Man/ha/in and treat it like the hot zone it obviously was. Inning 6 saw the seeds of vaccine doubt sewn by Messrs Warren, Biden, Harris when they screamed loudly “don’t trust the Trump vax” and obviously, people believed them. We see that in the numbers even today. Here’s the only real statistic that matters—-under Trump’s leadership, the amazing, cool, legit and life saving vaxx to combat a virus developed on foreign soil was developed with amazing speed, delivered to market where Joe and your man boy Trudeau only had to not $&@$ it up, but they were not up to the task. The fact is that Trump saved tens of millions of lives, all praise to 45. From your friend Lehnny across the pond, i can understand you taking our gift for granted, but you are welcome anyway.

I’m not wired to look at the world in this overly-simplistic fashion, but it seems like it would be both liberating and limiting at the same time.

If it 'won't work', whatcha'all upset about? All this dialogue is what makes us stronger as a nation.

Oh, you have concerns about the security of our elections, and ensuring that our process is fair and just. Get in line, it seems everyone has those concerns, oddly, after the most ultra-secure and really really cool election in the history of peopleness. I thought you had issues with this particular case in Texas.

It's important to realize that men and women respond to different environmental stimuli, especially in a quasi-professional setting. You want to validate one's individuality, of course, but you must offer intellectual honesty because a rising tide lifts all boats. If male, tell him you've been known to wax a chump like a candle. If female, you have a choice here, and your life likely depends on you making the right call. You go with either telling her she's a firework, or that you got 99 problems and a ***** ain't one. This is how we build mutual, sustaining and sustainable respect in this modern world.

What’s the problem you see here?

Using that metric—That number is dwarfed by the number he kept alive though, huh?

I’m odd man out. I understood your point.

It’s more simple than that. The chaos ensued because Americans put a guy in office the Taliban knew. They knew he was weak, foolish and simple long before he became an old fool. Now, he starts sending them money, it would seem. Your man is bad.

It's not a conspiracy if one believes it to be true. Wait a minute, that doesn't sound right...

I'm worried sick you're part of the St Louis cabal looking to lure the Bills away. That you joined the board in 2005 is very suspicious. I saw "War of the Worlds"--you should just change your name to DrPlayingTheLongGame.

Joe got turned around a bit. He was thinking the post office shadouzzle would protect males.

In just 7 months… COVID is an issue while Joe alligator arms mandates, begging business to do his dirty work. This for a guy who walked in with the magic elixir handed to him; Afghanistan implodes, with blood on his hands, as he comforts the families of soldiers lost with stories about how is loss is really the most important thing; Our relationship with allies is fractured, some going so far as to say the American government can’t be trusted; The southern border continues on its journey to shitsville—kids in cages, COVID spread, disregard for our laws; Joe describe a senior adviser with a phrase most closely associated with the hateful rhetoric of 1950s Deep South America, 100% par for the course and surprising no one; This is the status quo those folks were apparently looking for to stay safe.

I have to say that it seems that “scant” is an exaggeration based on what has been revealed so far.

It’s on me. I try every now and again and it’s waste of time. A while back he was blathering on about Jordan and I asked the same basic question—“What ya got?”. Here’s the answer—he’s got someone else’s Star Wars meme.

This post intrigues me. You took the time to seek it out, read it, and consider it important enough to share with the group. My assumption—and I could be wrong here—is that you think it bolsters a case against Jim Jordan for…something. So, I read it, looking for some sort of smoking gun. The article can be summed up as follows: 1. Politico asked Jim Jordan if he spoke with Donald Trump on 1/6. 2. Politico said Jordan said he spoke with Donald Trump on 1/6. 3. Newsweek, recognizing that there is no compelling interest to a story that suggest a journalist received a benign answer to a question, decided to spice things up. Instead of writing “Jordan answered the question…”, they changed it to “Jordan admitted…” adding a conspiratorial tone to the story. 4. A couple no-name losers have suggested Jordan saying he spoke with the President is indicative of….what? Speaking with the president? What are you seeing here Billsy? The criminal investigatory arm of the US government is going nowhere fast. Trump is not implicated. Jordan is not implicated. What’s got you bird dogging this one?

When I lived in the lower Hudson Valley, a lady driving on 684 (runs between Putnam County and White Plains) has a tire blowout. Got out of her car, waiting on a tow truck, the wind picked up a road sign and tossed it into her. Killed her instantly. This stuff is nothing to fool around with.

“Speak up Dear, Grampy Joe is dreaming about Cornpop again”.- —Dr Grandmam Jill to Billsy, 8/2021

Biden traffiks in his son’s death, it’s an absolute disgrace. I recall him talking about how the Obamas offered to help with expenses after his son died. The guy was the AG of Delaware at one point, a well-to-do man and son of wealthy parents. If Obama had to lend him money they were a bunch of morons across the board. Then, he dropped the obligatory reference to his loss when the suicide bomber struck, no doubt knowing his comments would not be challenged. This, however is beyond the pale. His son was 46 years old, he developed and aggressive and deadly cancer, received the finest care in the world and died in the care and comfort of his family, most likely medicated to take away the pain. Tragic for the family, tragic for Biden, but not even close to what occurred here. The Marines were all very young, and were killed when a vest was detonated in an effort to cause maximum pain, suffering and ultimately death. That it occurred in part due to the chaos created by Biden himself, in the middle of a hell hole thousands of miles from home, in a losing mission makes it all the worse. I can’t imagine having to listen to this dim witted and demented ####### as he compared pain in their moment of heartache is outrageous.

It’s finally happened… @Niagara Bill has lost his ever lovin mind. https://citizenfreepress.com/breaking/the-competition-is-over-canada-has-a-new-unknown-vaccine-hero/