leh-nerd skin-erd

Trump was lawfully elected President in 2016, yes? He was the legitimate President, you agree, yes? There is more than one religion, obviously.

Your initial message to me included a reference to being a "cult member", and it's why I suggested you were a pompous a$$ quite some time ago. I stand by that characterization, and none of your foot stomping or demands changes that. I also suggested that given a chance to have a face to face dialogue on these issues, you would not lead off with that sort of comment. It simply would not happen, not because there would be an argument, or fight, or major disagreement. It's because sane, rational folks don't go around screaming "CULT MEMBER" in social settings in civilized society. Why do it here, Kemp? It's not a great look, but the look defines 'pompous' interaction. Be civil, expect civility back from me. In the meantime, I hope you have a joyous day.

If by 'my values' you mean listening objectively to what Neil said and discussing it, ok.

I understand that you feel the way you do, but your inability to focus on the evolution of your perspective is your burden, not mine.

He used that term, not me. The point is he took a stand about misinformation, he claimed, but then seemed to indicate he might have stayed in spite of the misinformation if they had the superior platform. He may have been trying to finger Spotify as you say, but he sounded sorta confused on what he was protesting. Maybe he was really, really upset about the misinformation but could live with it if his music sounded tight and Neil got paid.

You've lost track again. You stated a position, asked a question and declared there was only possible answer. That was you, Kemp, not me. Then, when I replied, you didn't ask me for anything, you demanded a reply. Here, I'll provide the quote. You know the question. You know the answer, and have assured me there is only one. Does it matter what I think? Celebrate!

Very nice. I try not to do too much research into opinions/lives of artists/actors etc. More often than not, they end up sounding disconnected from the real life most people live, be it because they have more money than they can ever spend, or they have an inflated value of the net worth of their opinion, or they are strange generally. On this particular article, maybe it paints his position in a different light for me. I'd assume if was terrified of COVID and was completely closed-minded to Joe Rogan's perspective, perhaps part of his animus was due to the health conditions of his children. I still don't understand what the pixilation issue had to do with the COVID crisis, but good for him for trying to improve the lives of his children.

No, I'm quite certain I'm correct here. Have a good day though.

Neil Young is a great artist. Reminds me of my younger days, but I think he's still beefing with Spotify. I'm not really sure what his perspective is here...it's like he's kinda sorta upset they didn't choose the guy who's average fan is 77 years old v the guy making them millions. On the other hand he seems to imply that if they offered the best sound quality, Spotify fans might well be considering the needle and the damage done to this day. Either way, it's great for him that he has enough money not to care.

You are mistaking me for someone else, I fear.

The religious institutions should offer classes on beating the student loan game. Attendance would go through the roof!

I guess. I'm self-employed and was trying to think outside the box. Don't get me wrong, that whole œ thing is a pain in the a$$ as well. I also added 911 to speed dial to our speed dial, it's *4357*. I created a simple jingle to help my employees remember: Dial star four three five seven star, It spells HELP wherever you are! We've only lost 2 people so far.

I cannot speak to that. Ah, that makes a lot of sense when one knows medical shorthand. Sidebar: It only takes 22 days to create a new habit, one that might improve understanding for all st/hœdrz.* *st/hœdrz is company s/h** for stakeholders **s/h is company shorthand for s/h

I thought after you started discussing weigh-ins and x factors, we were just stringing words together to create content. You know, institutional barbarism.

If you see that as the only possible answer, then the only pertinent question in my opinion is why would you need validation?

Thank you, too. I think part of the challenge is I actually understand what I write, but your last couple contributions do not make much sense to me. If I reason weakly, I submit it's on you to provide clarity.

You’ve made quite a case here. Compartmentalized, yet fully engaged. Expansive, yet convertibility stringent. Much to think about.

You’re doing your heavy lifting for the wrong poster. @Tiberius is the legal zoom guy. Good stuff tho.

Right. What?

I understand how you feel, mostly because you keep repeating yourself. Should be a slam dunk per find law dot com. That’s ok.

Why don’t you join that board and ask him yourself?

You inquire about trust in government but don’t want to talk about trust in government. Weird. Anyway…I’ll forgo linking body language analysis in the meeting below. International politics in a very complicated game, but one thing seems certain—this interaction reflects mutual respect, deference and friendship: Obviously, Dems sent a message to Barrack about partnering with a notorious foreign adversary. It’s quite likely ten, maybe twenty Dems nationally stayed home on Election Day to protest this partnership: https://www.statista.com/statistics/245803/preliminary-results-of-the-popular-vote-of-the-2012-presidential-election/ President Obama has won the election with about 65.9 million votes from the population. His opponent Mitt Romney could gather about 60.9 million votes. Then, a short time later, of course, Putin annexed Crimea. Perhaps this was the flexibility promised by BO and approved by 65,900,000 supporters: https://www.cbsnews.com/news/russia-annexes-crimea-away-from-ukraine-with-signature-from-vladimir-putin/ Was all this a disqualifier for you? 🤷🏼‍♂️

Why are you doing this to yourself, Kemp? You get yourself all twisted in an emotional pretzel, dream up some unanswerable questions and when I respond, you stew about like the angry clown in IT. Choosing this hill to plant your flag is moronic. Literally every political campaign, ever, includes word tracks and cautionary tales about trusting government. Every one. Let's see, off the top of my head, just your people: Democrat party nominee, 40,000,000 Trumpians are deplorable and beyond redemption; Democrat party 2016-2020, the Trump presidency was illegitimate, the election stolen, illegitimate, Trump acted treasonously; (Biden comp) Democrat party, 2016-2023...the Impeachment years; (Biden comp) Democrat party, basically forever...the SC is corrupt and can't be trusted; (Biden comp) Democrat party, 2020---don't trust the vaccine developed under the government watch of the wrong guy; (Biden comp) Democrat party, don't trust SC nominee Brett Kavanaugh, he's serial sex abuser; (Biden comp) Democrat party, don't trust SC nominee Clarence Thomas, he's a serial sex predator; (Biden comp) Joe Biden, R politicians gonna put y'all in chains; (Biden comp) I'll ask you my question now: Did democrat leadership foster an air of trust and respect when Trump shocked the world and lawfully defeated Hillary Clinton in the election of 2016? You won't answer. I'll do it for you: No, Leh-nerd, they did not. You're right, the dems enflamed their base with fabricated tales of stolen elections, treason and KGB agents sleeping in yarangy on the White House lawn. I still hate Trump, but you're right on dems sowing seeds of mistrust of government among the populace, and I'm lucky to call you friend.

People are being held accountable, Tibsy, just check the news. You keep mentioning this 'stirred up' thing, are you advocating creating an addendum to the criminal code for Stirred Up Sh8t? Stirred up in the third degree? Misdemeanor Stirrage? Whatever is on your mind, stop speaking in riddles. I've respectfully responded to your question and accept you don't like my answer. You want to rush head long into lynch-mob mode, that's just not my game.

I think it was "ok" to hold a rally because that's one of the fundamental freedoms our country offers. You likely would take away that freedom to silence the opposition--just as I suggested to Frankish yesterday when he raised hypotheticals about Biden declaring martial law. I think it was a bad idea to have the rally on 1/6. Biden was being embalmed* into office, nothing was going to change that, and there was only downside. We saw the downside, it was bad for the country, and here we are. I know the fairy tale, Tibsy. We've rehashed it multiple times over the past couple days, and it's still bunk. It's not unlike Trump and MSB, post Kashoggi, and how things were going to change and Glass Joe was gonna open a can of WHOOP A$$ when he took over. Next thing you know, the fisting commences, money flows to our temporary 4 year enemy--or tenemy as I have decided to call it---just like it did when Barrack and Joe were running the show. It's also very poor internet protocol to declare someone willfully ignorant and misspell willfully. Be better, be best. *edit--try as I might, when I typed 'inaugurated' and the B name together, my system auto-corrects to embalmed. Weird.