SectionC3

Still got nothing. Just like yesterday. Just like tomorrow.

Player for player trade. What’s the harm I trying? Maybe Houston wants something we’re likely to cut, anyway. I saw Keenum mentioned upthread. Hypothetically speaking I wonder what effect, if any, trading for him would have on comp formula. I’ve never thought of a scenario like that before.

Kyle Allen looks to me like a guy who didn’t bother to put the time in learning the offense over the offseason. The pick six was mutual responsibility. Shavers should have caught it, but Kyle double clutched and threw it way too hard and wide (it doesn’t show on the TV feed, but in the stadium the whole thing looked like a disaster from double clutch to launch). Boettger, sadly, looks cooked. shavers has an NFL body but the hands . Ateman played fast and flashed, as did Isabella. I don’t think shorter is a lock by any stretch. He might get the Hodgins treatment and redshirt for a year on IR.

Hoax. You first, constitutional scholar. Where in the plain language of the 14A is a conviction required as a predicate to the subject ban? We’ve waited all day for you insight with respect to this venerable text.

It’s called capitalism. I worked. He didn’t. He can keep on whining. Or work harder and go to school. They need to stop whining and get to work.

Hoax. As usual, you haven’t thought things through.

No. Whether there’s a PI or PD accident in a DWI often dictates how the case is charged and, eventually, pleaded. Higher BACs w/o accident often are treated the same as much lower BACs w/ accident. I don’t like that approach.

Not the issue. You still haven’t addressed your conviction hoax.

I agree on outcome to a point. But if you're rolling around at .22 and, by the grace of God, you don't hurt anyone, I'm not of the school that you get treated the same as someone who has a PD or PI accident that doesn't result in death or a significant serious injury.

Hoax. You’re dodging your textual hoax again. Looks like you talked about the constitution out of your rear end (a typical MAGA approach), got called on it, and now won’t own the fact that there is a significant textual problem with respect to your “conviction” argument. Maybe before you thump the constitution you should try to, like, read it.

That's not what you said. You focused on "conviction" and indicated that anyone believing a "conviction" is a predicate to application of the 14A bar isn't a constitutional scholar. So, esteemed constitutional scholar, on what language do you rely for that proposition? (Hint: your plain textual analysis fails, and your previous point about the plain language of the constitution is a hoax. Try actually, you know, reading that document before you opine as to who is and isn't an expert on that text.)

Hoax. But apparently you are. Where in the plain text of the Fourteenth Amendment is it said that a conviction, be it criminal or following an impeachment proceeding of Congress, is required to trigger that preclusive part of that amendment?

Hoax.

Looks like we have a little flattering imitation and some dueling hoaxes here. Are you gonna bust out some Pee Wee idioms next? Maybe, “I’m rubber, you’re glue, my hoax bounces off me and sticks to you?”

You're a Gretchen Whitmer fan? I never would have expected. Hoax.

Time to respond to this but not time to respond to me, eh? Looks like all of your stolen election gibberish is nothing but a hoax.

Hoax. Not my burden to disprove fraud. There’s a presumption of regularity with respect to elections. So show your cards, hoaxer.

Cool story. Now point to proof that the 2020 election was permeated by fraud.

I'm not denying or disproving their nonsense. I'm pointing out that there is no evidence that the election was conducted unfairly and therefore no evidence to support their gibberish about widespread fraud. I don't have the burden of proof here; that's borne by the election deniers. Hoax. Was that before or after you became pro-command economy?

Hoax. He didn't mysteriously win. He won fairly. You refuse to acknowledge that votes from different geographic areas are counted at different times.

Another MAGA slob.

These people are nuts.

One too many drinky poos for Big Blitz today.

Hoax. You seem to have lots of problems, plural. To suggest you have merely one problem is mistaken. I don’t even know what you’re talking about with cis this and trans that. Live and let live. Worry about an actual problem, like health care rights, or gun violence, or the opioid epidemic. It’s a little early to be drunk, isn’t it? Maybe at least for me, but apparently not for you. Also, based on your approach, and upon the opinions you express here, I suspect that people like you work for people like me. So perhaps shunning people like me maybe might not be in your best economic interest.

Good point. I saw one of my neighbors bashing in the head of another neighbor because some dude swam in a womens’ college swim meet. Hoax. This hand-wringing is stupid. Worry about an actual problem.