SectionC3

Just wait until kids go back to school in the rust belt and things get out of control. See what the suburbs say then. That, I submit, is when we’ll see Biden start to put this thing away.

Hoax. I don’t hate police. I believe in the rule of law. You should try it sometime. It might result in you not get shot seven times in the back.

Democratic presidential candidates all the way through. Used to split tickets otherwise depending on the candidate and the circumstance (e.g., I think Chris Collins is a douche, but it was better for the area to have him in Congress given his connections; Grisanti for NYS Senate because I wanted some counterweight to the shady downstate Dems in the Senate at the time). Maybe someday I'll vote for a Republican candidate again. But not one who didn't stand up to Trump.

That's really too bad. They're pretty true to their beliefs.

Haven’t seen you in the Flynndicated thread yet. How come?

Hoax. Trump will be too busy golfing to get anything done.

Hoax. All of the lying by the current occupant of the White House surely has made him sick! Hoax. Re: the second sentence. Hoax. I’m just having fun with all of you alt-wrong kool-aid guzzlers!

I missed your comment in the Flynndicated thread. Any thoughts to share?

My goodness that was lovely. That’s what a president should sound like. Dignified. Smart. Reserved. Thoughtful. Truthful. Cognizant of the significant problems facing middle America right now with respect to the struggle to re-open schools to in-person learning. I can’t wait until he is our President. It’s time to restore America’s soul, and Joe Biden is just the person to do it. Discuss!

Fake news.

Hoax.

Just wait until he starts using racist canards.

Lived there for awhile during law school. Love it. Better pizza in the Southtowns, but just a great place. (Those JOs aside.)

Looked. Can’t find it. Saw it on FB last night. It might be on wnymedia.net sometime today. https://news.wbfo.org/post/protesters-return-hertel-confronted-bar-patrons Here’s a pic of the confrontation. The guy in the Bud Light shirt was pretty upset about the exercise of First Amendment rights. He and other (similarly old, washed, and moderately sober patrons) did things like flip off the protesters, yell racial slurs, and insult them from the sidewalk outside the bar. The guy with the 80s mullet, who actually played peacemaker in this photo, displayed his anus to the crowd as well. Not classy.

OMG. Saw the video last night. What a bunch of scumbags. Scratch MT Pockets off the list of places in which I will set foot. Wow.

Smells like late summer this morning in Buffalo. And I detected a whiff of hot garbage as well on the walk into work. But nothing is on fire. Thankfully. More updates later. Also, I don’t know about you, but I think that all of this hand-wringing about democrat-run cities spontaneously combusting is a bit of a . . . Hoax.

That’s probably a hoax, too.

Biden in Orchard Park. Trump will win the town, and probably split nearby suburbs like West Seneca and Cheektowaga. But the Trump support (or anti-Hillary “support”) isn’t nearly what it was last time. The Bush Republicans are not going to vote for another four years of this crap. So hopefully that portends well for similar areas in similar states.

Interesting that this thread has been up for about a day and we still haven’t heard from @Deranged Rhino. I wonder why?

You have a pretty warped view of justification. Last I looked, resisting arrest doesn’t justify seven gunshots to the back.

Actually that’s the purpose of the thread. I’d like you to educate me on your expert communist arsonist detection skills and techniques. Based on the criteria I was able to uncover, the guys in the photos qualify as commies. Do you have different criteria? And, if so, can you please share? We all would like to improve our ability to identify the communist arsonists who cause you to tremble in fear. This definitely adds a new layer of complication to our analysis.

Good data point. Fugliness is not an essential commie trait. Well done.

I agree except for the undercurrent. I worked the streets in 2016. I had a bad vibe in September. I sensed the persuadables were going to break for Trump. Close the book on the Clintons, I thought, was a great line at the end. but otherwise, completely agree.

I don’t assume anything. I just want to know whether the fact of a prior sexual assault justifies shooting someone seven times in the back. There seems to be a real struggle to answer that question on the part of the people who read this thread. Fake news.

OK. So let’s move to the next step. Does the information with respect to the sexual assault, assuming the officer in question had that information and knew that he was dealing with Blake immediately before the shooting, justify shooting Blake seven times?