SectionC3

Rule #2, please.

You and I rarely agree but I'm with you on this one.

Depends when he goes. The whole thing is a mess. I think it's too late to substitute in some places. Then the questions become whether any of those states have a law that punishes faithless electors and, if os, whether such law allows an elector to vote for different candidate should the designated candidate die before the electoral college meets. So, hypothetically speaking, I wonder whether those laws allow an elector in, say, Alabama to vote for Pence should Trump die between now and the time the Electoral College meets in December. So many complications here. I hope Barrett doesn't get it. Holy cow. I didn't even think of that.

I hate to say it but I wondered about this, too. Fake diagnosis so he can "recover" and try to link it to his point that the virus is a hoax, etc. It's a byproduct of having a hopeless liar in the Oval Office, and yet another reflection of how that office has been disgraced in the past 3.5 years. I have no intention of praying for this guy, but I don't wish him ill, and I especially don't want his minor child to become sick. So, said simply, "it is what it is."

Sorry to lose you. Best of luck and hope to "see" you soon. Substitute "dies" for "doesn't get better" and the answer (to the best of my knowledge) is yes. Replacing Trump on the ballots is the tricky part. That's a state by state issue. I'm sure we'll see a story about it in the next day or two. But we're close to the point where it's too late to replace him. Early voting, absentee voting, and printing logistics make the deadline to replace earlier than one might think.

Pro-Proud Boys and Anti-Christmas. Sad.

Did you see any group or groups as “white supremacists?” If so, which one or ones?

So disavow Trump.

Hoax. Your attempt to dilute and soften the meaning of “white supremacist” and “white supremacy” is absurd. That is the incoherent, incogent point here.

Fake news.

Sooo . . . You still haven’t said that you’re not a Proud Boy. I’m a Catholic. Sometimes I wonder what Catholicism is. But that doesn’t mean that I’m not a Catholic. So please, sir, clarify that you are not a Proud Boy. You seem to be avoiding that issue. I apply the well-accepted, conventional, and undisputed meaning to that phrase: it is the belief that white people are superior to people of other races.

He didn’t say no. Seems like he’s either a Proud Boy or a Proud Boy sympathizer. Sad.

Hoax. He refused to do so last night. Stand by, Proud Boy!

“Clean up the place.” Irony.

Riveting stuff. You support someone who won’t condemn white supremacy. Chew on that.

Irony.

Don’t forget self love. The Proud Boys have a problem in that respect.

Rule #2, please. Ironically it was Trump who accused his opponent of using drugs in advance of the debate. Maybe Trump should be the one investigated for spiking up.

Hoax. Biden told the truth. Trump should try it sometime. Your mistake is that you fail to separate the office from its occupant. The current occupant is a clown, and you support a clown. Sad.

Let's just establish a bottom line here. Trump is a scumbag who winks at white supremacists. Trump's supporters, at best, support a scumbag. At worst, they too are scumbags. The debate was a travesty in which Trump's petulance, boorishness, and rudeness deprived the American people of an opportunity for the exchange of ideas with respect to ways in and methods by which our country could be improved. It was a disgrace.

More on the Proud Boys. Too much self-love in that group. https://www.thedailybeast.com/new-proud-boy-rules-less-fighting-less-*****

He didn't denounce anything. Read more carefully. He acknowledged that he was "willing" to condemn (entries 1-2), and that he was "prepared" to condemn (entries 3-4), but he didn't actually condemn. So you support this scumbag, you support what he stands for. Which is refusing to condemn white supremacy. *** Here's a link about your scumbag Proud Boy pals: https://www.splcenter.org/fighting-hate/extremist-files/group/proud-boys

Amen, brother. This is an historic low. One either stands against it or is complicit.

Yeah, this is the part I’m not clear on. Would I test positive immediately after contracting the virus? The next day? Two days later? Etc. If we’re on the shorter end of the spectrum, then it’s possible that that Titans players and personnel acquired the virus after playing the Vikings, which would be great news in terms of containing the intra- and inter-team spread.

Let’s take a deep breath here and start from scratch. What’s the incubation period? What I’m getting at is that it might be possible that the Titans picked this up after the game on Sunday (e.g., at a postgame celebration) and that it might be a “local” issue as opposed to something that affects multiple teams and players outside of a given social group. I will add this: driving through OP yesterday we saw a couple of our own guys hanging out without masks on at one of the local establishments. People have to live, and I don’t knock them for that. But the goal is to win the Super Bowl, and going to bars (which were very crowded, likely because of the weather) does not further that mission. So hopefully the Titans picked this up after the game, and hopefully it’s a lesson for our own guys to double down on precautions.