It's an aggregation of a limited amount of studies. Published by a group with, shall we say, some interesting (and, to my understanding, discredited) scientific theories.
Hopefully the treatments outlined in the paper are proven effective. But, to use one of its own monikers, the AAPS previously has promoted "junk science," and this paper is far from the final word on the effectiveness of the treatments considered.
I don't pay much attention to you. But it would be appreciated if you were fair and balanced in your scolding. Be better.