
SectionC3
Community Member-
Posts
7,494 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Gallery
Profiles
Forums
Events
Everything posted by SectionC3
-
To be fair a good part of the “other” 168 minutes is consumed by replays and poignant analysis. So there’s that.
-
Get it on the agenda and I’m sure they can find a few minutes to work in this strange but perhaps legitimate complaint. There’s always room for more hate at the 2020 Republican National Convention!
-
Maybe you are better. Never met you. But I kind of doubt it based on some of the stuff you say here.
-
So what is “best protects” in this situation? Lingering investigation, subpoena, weeks of press, potential 5A fight? Or just go in there and laugh it off? I had someone call me over the weekend who is in a bit of a jam, allegedly did nothing wrong, but has to sit down for an interview this week. If he walks in weak, he’s going to get run over. So he can skip the interview (bad plan here), or walk in there, project confidence, and get the thing over with. Nothing to hide = no reason to hide.
-
Thompson I am not, that is for sure.
-
Copying the libs to own the libs. Trashy. I already used tragicomedy. Be better.
-
i don’t have much free time. But I do have writer’s block today. Gotta change the situation to break the block. So picking on Trump and the dopes that follow him always is a good source of amusement in that respect.
-
Global warming err Climate change HOAX
SectionC3 replied to Very wide right's topic in Politics, Polls, and Pundits
Didn’t Pope Francis demand an end to the maltreatment of the Earth, as part of God’s creation? I believe he did. Apparently we’re getting back to selective Christianity again on your part. Maybe we can talk about the prosperity Gospel next. Or opine about how if oil spills weren’t a good thing God would stop them. You and I practice different versions of Christianity, that is for sure. -
Good work, Gary! I’m not one to play the treason card, but if you think Trump is treasonous and traitorous I probably wouldn’t argue too hard with you. Well done.
-
Maybe next time Dan Bognino plays lawyer he can explain why Mike Flynn pleaded guilty. Perhaps Dan can also shed light on the criminality and corruption that seems to follow Trump and his pals around. Steve Bannon, Mike Flynn, Paul Manafort. Michael Cohen, Rick Gates, the venerable Roger Stone, and even local thief and COVID-19 fearmongerer Chris Collins. Lots of dudes with fleas lying around that dog.
-
Well played! Unfortunately (or fortunately, maybe, I don’t know), no. But I am the subject of a sad tragicomedy in which transactional, traitorous Trump tramples the constitution.
-
What’s better - talking to investigators and nipping an investigation in the bud when you’ve done nothing wrong and have nothing to hide, or stonewalling and letting it fester? Common sense said that if the kid did nothing wrong and has nothing to answer for he walks in, answers whatever question is asked, and gets the thing over with. There’s no such thing as a perjury trap when one hasn’t done anything wrong. Instead, here, the kid is clamming up, which, as an investigator would only set off alarm bells and tell me it’s time to dig deeper and find out what he might or might not have to say.
-
He clammed up in a civil matter so he wouldn’t have to deal with whether he could plead the fifth in that case. It’s a bad look. It’s not something a jury can hold against him, but it does ring alarm bells for people investigating the matter. Nothing to hide means no reason to hide. FYI, this isn’t about waiving his right to counsel - of course he’s a dope if he gives up counsel. This is about talking to investigators with or without counsel.
-
Mar-a-Moscow is going to be awesome.
-
Maybe they can bunk at Otis if they both end up doing federal time. They could relive the glory days and complain about Obama all the time!
-
Tremendous Traitor Trump Tricks Trailer Trash. Alliteration is pretty cool sometimes.
-
Hmmmm. Whataboutism. Nice. Still, looks like Rico’s in a little legal jeopardy, eh? It’s interesting and surely completely coincidental that the people closest to the President keep on breaking the law.
-
I think they’re going to keep 9. Feliciano has to make the final 53 to get on IR-eligible to return, right? If that’s the case, and if they think Feliciano can make it back this year, then we might see 10 (incl. Feliciano) stay on cutdown day, with Feliciano to IR the next day. I kind of wonder if Bates, Winters, and Boehm/Boettger will round out that group of 9. We could always release a veteran likely to return and go light in a given position group for a day (e.g., T.J. Yeldon, or Croom if they IR/stash Sweeney and go 3 TE to start the year). As an aside, why Yeldon is a lock to make this team is beyond me. I guess it’s only because the Bills like to have a vet in each position group. I agree with you in theory. The idea is that a healthy team with a deeper roster would have an advantage over a banged-up team in your scenario.
-
Looks like Rico clammed up today. Which is within his right. But which also looks really, really bad. Almost like he has something to hide . . .
-
Hmmm. Not really funny. I didn’t even chuckle. Or smirk. That’s just bad humor.
-
Witty. So is “The Left” on your Hate Week agenda? And our washed up psycho has made an appearance! Great news! What is it that he/she will hate this week?
-
Good point, Clark. Her district doesn’t touch Manhattan. Well done. But she’s still “just” a Congresswoman in no position to be subservient to Putin. Unlike your boy Trump.
-
Hmmmm. Who hates those things? Care to share? Got any examples? Hoax. Trump and Epstein are pals.
-
Also, FYI, AOC is a Congresswoman from Manhattan, so she won’t be “going against Xi and/or Putin.” For the record, I’d also like Trump to take a position “against” Putin. You’re apparently cool with him cowering before a marginally first-world dictator. That’s pretty sad, but if that’s the position you want to take, there’s apparently nothing that I can do to convince you otherwise. Sad!