SectionC3
Community Member-
Posts
7,768 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Gallery
Profiles
Forums
Events
Everything posted by SectionC3
-
The Next Pandemic: SARS-CoV-2/COVID-19
SectionC3 replied to 1B4IDye's topic in Politics, Polls, and Pundits
Actually I suspect that any destruction of that drug was occasioned by the fact that it had no resale value and that it was cheaper to destroy it than it was to store it. One of those not throwing good money after bad/hoax things. -
Bottom line: You asked/demanded that I "[e]xplain how they are trying to take away right to vote." I asked you to clarify the "they" in your question. You now say that you can't provide that clarification because you don't know who the they is. Makes perfect sense, only to those who use Crow logic. And you want to be my financial adviser. Not happening, sir. There's no misunderstanding. The Crow has to clarify his question/demand. Because, as he knows, as he himself phrased the question/demand, he has acknowledged that he has crowy pals. It's sad, I know, but there's a reason why this guy has earned the nickname Chef Jim Crow.
-
You're a confusing guy. All I wanted to know was how you defined "they" for the purpose of your question. Is the "they" the "your crowy pals" to whom I referred? Because if it is, you have acknowledged having crowy pals. So let's just start there. Do you or do you not have crowy pals?
-
I'm still a little confused by your crowy "logic." Are the people to whom you refer not your pals? Or are they pals of yours who are not crowy? Please advise.
-
These posts clarify the issue, Chef Jim Crow. I posted: "When some of your crowy pals try to take it away, these people fight to retain the right. It should be simple to understand, even for you." You responded: "Awesome. Explain how they are trying to take away right to vote. I’ll give you one shot." I then asked: “ 'They' being your crowy pals?" So, this is simple, even for you. Is the "they" to whom you referred your crowy pals? Please don't make this any harder than it needs to be. TwoBillsDrive turns its lonely eyes to you on this issue, Chef Jim Crow.
-
I'm sorry. I'm just trying to make sure that I comprehend your question. The "they" to whom you refer is your crowy pals, is that correct? I can't possibly begin to answer your question if I don't know the identity of the "they" to which or whom you refer.
-
“They” being your crowy pals?
-
When some of your crowy pals try to take it away, these people fight to retain the right. It should be simple to understand, even for you.
-
The Next Pandemic: SARS-CoV-2/COVID-19
SectionC3 replied to 1B4IDye's topic in Politics, Polls, and Pundits
Call Oklahoma. I hear that state has a lot of HCQ to get rid of. Something about falling for the Trump HCQ hoax … -
The Next Pandemic: SARS-CoV-2/COVID-19
SectionC3 replied to 1B4IDye's topic in Politics, Polls, and Pundits
Crow logic at its finest. -
The Next Pandemic: SARS-CoV-2/COVID-19
SectionC3 replied to 1B4IDye's topic in Politics, Polls, and Pundits
You’ll probably try to treat that with HCQ, too. -
Convicted felon Donald Trump's follies
SectionC3 replied to BillStime's topic in Politics, Polls, and Pundits
Good point. Let’s get the Antifa Air Force on this guy. The AAF is not nonsense at all. -
The Next Pandemic: SARS-CoV-2/COVID-19
SectionC3 replied to 1B4IDye's topic in Politics, Polls, and Pundits
That is a guy with good judicial temperament. Hoax. Trump probably is pissed he wasn’t invited to the kegger with Squigg. Thanks for the update. I’m sure you posted that out of concern, and in no way intended your post to sound the dog whistle. -
Bills player tested positive?
SectionC3 replied to IgotBILLStopay's topic in The Stadium Wall Archives
Idle time, right? Time for them to get busy. -
Vic Carucci retiring from Buffalo News
SectionC3 replied to \GoBillsInDallas/'s topic in The Stadium Wall Archives
Thank you on Jerry Sullivan. Unreadable and unlistenable. Like a friggin dark cloud all of the time. -
Bills player tested positive?
SectionC3 replied to IgotBILLStopay's topic in The Stadium Wall Archives
I was just thinking that the best way to deal with this might be for all of them to get the F off of Twitter and social media this year. Enough is enough. This is becoming a problem. -
The Next Pandemic: SARS-CoV-2/COVID-19
SectionC3 replied to 1B4IDye's topic in Politics, Polls, and Pundits
Asked, and asked, and asked, and asked again, then asked some more. And answered prior to your redundant questioning. Do your research, Chef Jim Crow. -
The Next Pandemic: SARS-CoV-2/COVID-19
SectionC3 replied to 1B4IDye's topic in Politics, Polls, and Pundits
Lysol. The man tried to use Lysol to combat the virus. That says it all. Not a mask, not social distancing, not anything grounded in common sense. Lysol. -
The Next Pandemic: SARS-CoV-2/COVID-19
SectionC3 replied to 1B4IDye's topic in Politics, Polls, and Pundits
Your gibberish is incomprehensible. And Trump. I'm still waiting for this to magically disappear. -
The Next Pandemic: SARS-CoV-2/COVID-19
SectionC3 replied to 1B4IDye's topic in Politics, Polls, and Pundits
Ha. The Crow complaining about someone behaving in an immature and dumb fashion. The irony is thick tonight. -
The Next Pandemic: SARS-CoV-2/COVID-19
SectionC3 replied to 1B4IDye's topic in Politics, Polls, and Pundits
I don’t “do your research” for you. Feel free to find the answer and give yourself the satisfaction that that you apparently crave. Have a nice day, Chef Jim Crow. -
The Next Pandemic: SARS-CoV-2/COVID-19
SectionC3 replied to 1B4IDye's topic in Politics, Polls, and Pundits
Hoax. I did. You just forgot, Chef Jim Crow. Apparently even chickens have better memories than you. Dumb is dumb. It applies to everyone who is afraid of an itty-bitty needle. -
The Next Pandemic: SARS-CoV-2/COVID-19
SectionC3 replied to 1B4IDye's topic in Politics, Polls, and Pundits
That would be like trying to teach a chicken about gravity. Good point. They’re dumb. That’s the primary reason.
