1billsfan

It's not just him, he's seriously tarnishing the entire democratic party with this move. Everyone will have the stink of coverup on them. Republicans were vilified after Watergate and with today's 24/7 news access, the democratic party was just thrown under the bus by Obama. He was supposed to be the party's savior and he's officially turned into their worst nightmare.

They're out of bullets. Anyone who doesn't either follow Fox News or the new media is just willfully blinding themselves to what's going on in this country. They live in a delusional world. One where Obama is doing a good job and the only blame for things not being better is because of George Bush. Anyone making fun of Fox News these days are making themselves look foolish. Fox News isn't perfect, but without them this country would be completely "bleeped" right about now.

That replacing people line is actually a falsehood. I live in NJ and Wawas are filled to the brim with employees. Romney was right, they are a real private sector success story. msubc, makin' s@#! up broadcasting company. Someone should interview Tom Brokaw and ask him what he thinks about this. It's seriously shameful stuff. It seems that every day there's a new story about the new media trouncing the old media.

The results in WI should tell you that a revolution has taken place... http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Journalism/2012/06/14/Juan-Williams-Malkin-real-reporter Don't sweat it, voters don't get their news from the MSM anymore.

Maher and Schultz are literally a couple of brainwashed idiots. Obama and Pelosi on the other hand, understand the political "game" all too well. They know the liberal "trick" playbook and the old "trick" plays are no longer working because the game has changed. Due in no small part to the MSM's lack of credibility and the growing emergence and importance of the new media.

It's perfectly legitimate for Mitt Romney to call out Obama to respond to this story as to whether it is fact or fiction. David Axelrod doesn't miss an opportunity to tell a national audience that Mitt Romney is an extremist. This is a good test for Romney and whether he's in it to win it or if he doesn't have the balls. The MSM will have to cover this story if Romney decides to make this an issue about his opponent's (and current president) possibly real extremist intentions. You have to force Obama respond to this.

It's done, democracy's dead... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vEwXa197uBU

Don't bother with them. They don't want to hear the truth, like when democracy died on tuesday night.

Is it safe to say that the "new media" is slowly killing off far left liberalism?

That's because they knew Jon Huntsman was the guy they could easily beat. Mitt Romney looked as loose as a young, sex-crazed Hugh Hefner compared to the incredibly stiff and incredibly dull Huntsman. It's not an insult to the guy who seemed nice enough and qualified, it's just how it played out. Huntsman was the liberals' 2012 "John McCain" model. As soon as he won the primary the liberals would have torn Huntsman to shreds.

What are they doing? If you're invited over to her house, why is there a raffle involved? It's a stupid raffle not an invitation, right? Why in the heck is the Obama campaign using the quintessential NYC-based elitist actress for his campaign. Is it a bit cynical to suggest that the campaign has such an inferior opinion of woman and think of them being so easily swayed by someone like SJP?

This was your challenge? I understand your frustration though. It must be tough to watch the supreme being, and intellectually inclined, Obama looking so dang inept. I added in that colloquialism just for you, btw.

No offense, but I can see why you want people here to watch this Obama-supporting intellectual on CNN… http://newsbusters.org/blogs/noel-sheppard/2012/04/17/cnns-fareed-zakaria-being-considered-diplomatic-post-obama-second-ter After doing a little researching and reading up on him, It's a safe bet that he has never once criticized the "chosen one". If he has, it was probably done with kid gloves. Yet you have the nerve to say that it's arguably the most well balanced and intelligent "PPP" show on TV today? Really? Seriously? I bet he does all kind of linguistic twisting and turning as to why this country is so "blanked" so that he doesn't come close to offending his leader. Am I wrong? Does he call out Obama's failed presidency? His resume includes Newsweek, Time, New York Times, The New Yorker and a wine columnist for Slate. I think America has had just about enough of these "intellectual" professors, they want to listen to people who will tell the the whole truth and not just tinker around the edges. This is why Fox News is trouncing CNN. They come the closest to telling the truth. They don't have to live under the NYC and DC "fear the leader" bubble. The rest of America not only hates the MSM, but they hate CNN and MSNBC too. It will be interesting to see what the Obama media does now that the cats truly out of the bag and they can no longer hide his ineptness anymore. The numbers don't lie.

I'm starting to wonder if you guys are on bath salts.

Asking what makes Obama a far left socialist? Seriously, I don't have all day to respond to a list like that. We obviously have different takes on Obama and that's cool. I was simply responding to a post regarding someone who was surprised at why a couple who were relying on government subsidies were not going to vote for Obama. I'm not into get into a long protracted back and forth on what Obama's policies are doing to this country. People have google, they can look it up if they feel in the dark because they've spent too much time following the MSM. The election isn't turning on what is or isn't said on this board. I think this will be a landslide and I think it's too late to change the outcome for Obama. If someone doesn't know who they will vote for by now, they're probably too dumb to know where their polling place is anyways.

Call me names all you want. I'm not going to argue with people who still support Obama. It's not being lazy, it's called not wasting my time. Anyone who still supports Obama at this late of date and after his epic failure at being president isn't going to vote for Romney anyways so why bother.

Sorry, but I'm not going down your 5 point list. If you don't know the reality score of Obama by now, you are too far gone.

As much as the left wish it weren't true, American's have an innate, independent hard working spirit. They also love to spend money, strive for the good life. These four years under the far left socialist Obama has been a real eye opener for people who were duped and voted for Mr. Hope and Change. Obama and the MSM wanted everyone to cry for the poor. Pity them. See these Americans as victims of the bad bad system of capitalism. That the wealthier of Americans need to do with less in order to make it more "fair" for the less fortunate. Well this historically idiotic course failed beyond even the harshest critics' imagination. Now, other than the super rich, no one is doing good. The middle class is slipping into the lower class and the lower class is slipping into poverty. This election will be a landslide win for Mitt Romney. No one wants to say it, but I will. Americans want to be great again. They want to work again. They want to spend money again. The only people voting for Obama this time around are minorities, celebrities and union members. That's it.

No one on the Bills has more pressure on him than Ryan Fitzpatrick. This was the case before Vince Young and it's still the case after he's been signed. He's the starting QB. The team has playoff expectations this year. Given his age, he's reached the "do or die" "are you or are you not a franchise QB" stage of his career. If he can't handle the pressure, doesn't play to the lofty expectations, then Young will get his shot before they go selecting a QB in next year's 1st round. I don't see how there can be any reasonable disagreement with this. Not by Fitzpatrick, the team, the coaches or the fans. Fitzpatrick is too old not to think 2012 is his make it or break it year.

Being an Obama supporter at this late date after he has thoroughly and unambiguously proven for three and a half years that he's neither qualified nor equipped to fix the economy is dumb. Just sayin'.

Not sure if you're being sarcastic, but if you aren't, I don't get anything great about the line. His line of argument is laughable. Even democrats are looking at him as if he's cracked. The anti-business president who has presided over the worst recession in US history is mocking his opponent's successes in the business world as a credential for the job of president. Obama should start touting his own past record instead. He can start with his sterling record of voting "present" 129 times in the Illinois state legislature. Anyone else beginning to think Obama may not even want to be reelected? I'm starting to wonder. He seems as uninterested and unenthused as his supporters. He may indeed have come to the conclusion his socialist policies won't ever work in America, he wants to maintain his far left credibility for whatever he does after he leaves office, and he wants to get out while the country hasn't totally caved in on itself and he becomes the most hated man in the history of America.

Obama is the worst president in the history of the US. The only reason he's hanging on in the polls is because there's a good portion of moderate democrats who when polled, are too ashamed to admit that they have no intention of voting for Obama. Both the left and right can all agree that Obama has no record to run on in 2012. So he's running it on "fairness"? Unfortunately for the middle class, "fairness" only covers his ideological left wing special interest groups. He's basically giving the middle finger to the middle class and thinks that they're too dumb to figure it out. Home values decline, salaries decline, obamacare attacking their religions, ballooning gas prices, food stamp enrollment explosion, federal debt explosion, horribly stagnant economy. Yeah, the American middle class want them some four more years of THAT kind of "fairness" baby! Everyone was warned about Obama being a far leftist. They were also warned he wasn't nearly qualified enough to handle the job. It's hard to imagine that the middle class, who were duped the first time around, will make the same mistake again. These fake distractions will not work this time around. He was given a huge chance by the American middle class, he failed, he ran the office like the clueless liberal ivy league professor that he is, he proved the doubters right, and it will be the truly qualified Mitt Romney in a landslide.

Story about the beating of a US soldier in Tampa, Florida... http://www.wtsp.com/news/topstories/article/255240/250/VIDEO-US-Army-soldier-brutally-beaten-in-South-Tampa- Were it not for Drudge, these practically invisible black on white hate crime stories would never see the light of day. Let's all imagine if these were a group of white youths beating up on a black man. What would the reaction of the MSM be? These stories appear to be endless and the MSM refuses to acknowledge them because of pie-in-the-sky liberal political correctness. I think that Martin and Zimmerman both had a hand in the tragic outcome of that day. That being said, Zimmerman may be guilty of something, but a "hate crime" is not one of them. He was trying to protect his community and got in way over his head.

Just explain to him why all of the people who paid the bills in California left the state and why that deficit has ballooned from 9 billion to 16 billion. I love it when brainless liberals bust on Palin inferring what a stupid person she is, yet when given simple facts can not comprehend the historic economic disaster of liberal tax and spend policies. If Obama gets reelected, what's happening in California is the harbinger of what will happen to the United States.

Democratic leaders need to stop with the charade they care one bit about middle America and just move it to LA, SF, NYC or Chicago. You know, where the "intelligent" people who know best live...LOL