1billsfan

http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/elections/election_2012/election_2012_presidential_election/ohio/election_2012_ohio_president

Let me drop some knowledge on you junior. The tea party are the ADULTS taking back this country from the adolescent, "my sweet 16", spend now screw the younger generations behavior of Obama, the dems and rino repubs in washington. One of the very few positives of Obama is that his socialist agenda single-handedly created the tea party just in time to save this country from the fates which are befalling the adolescent, "my sweet 16", spend now screw the younger generations Greece and California. This fantasy world of liberals is truly mind-blowing. I wonder if they'll all go insane when the leader of their cult loses this election.

We just don't get their bold, bubble-headed way of thinking. Like how the "Romney killed a guy's wife" ad wasn't meant to insinuate that Romney killed a guy's wife.

Seems your opinion is wrong... http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2012/08/12/Romney-Ryan-draw-massive-crowd-NC ...that is, if you were in fact ever thinking of voting for Mitt Romney. Which btw, I don't buy for one second. The liberals live in a bubble fantasy world where 2010 and the WI recall elections never happened and Newsroom is an unbiased HBO program. Their giddiness over the Paul Ryan pick is too funny because they actually believe this is great news for them...LOL

I think that a small, yet significant percentage of the people who answer they're voting for Obama in the polls are lying. Why? Four years of the race card being played by the MSM and Obama supporters against anyone opposing Obama. People don't want to deal with that garbage.

It was an adult pick. It forces Obama to come up with a realistic plan that saves medicare and social security for people 50 and younger. Everyone knows these programs are insolvent. Romney has a real plan, Obama's plan is the do nothing and go bankrupt Greece model. I know that a lot of people here think this race will be close, I don't. I think the American people, as they always do, save this country from the total destruction of four more years of Obama and they do it in a big way.

The majority of the polls you see are a hot mess. They're not reality. They're way over polling democrats, don't factor in the huge enthusiasm gap and they're not factoring in how many people are lying because they're afraid of being seen as a racist due to the MSM four year brow beating of anyone anti-Obama. Enjoy living in your liberal fantasy world till november. America knows a colossal failure when it sees one.

Obama and the lying sleazeball dems are in full panic mode because they know the polls are not a true reflection of the real numbers. They're all bailing on their own convention and they can't even fill the Bank of America stadium. Look at that and add it to the slimey campaign Obama is waging and you get a sense of the sad desperation that's about as far away from "hope" and "change" as the trip the mars rover took. It's embarrassing to see an Obama "sunshine and lollipops" "everything is fine" thread here. I guess it's ok to be delusional, but to start a thread? Yikes.

If Obama is doing so well and he won the summer as suggested, why is the Obama campaign now accusing Romney of murder?

I think they would work well together and could possibly have a Crosby/Hope "road to..." type of chemistry. This campaign is going to get VERY dirty and I think Romney will be making a huge mistake if he goes with "nice", "plain" and "boring".

The obvious choice is Chris Christie. Romney really is in desperate need of a "muscle" wingman (insert yawner fat joke here) to go against the Chicago sleazoid-style politics that Reid and Pelosi have rolled out the sneak preview of this week. It's not in Romney to do that day-in day-out dirty work that happens to be in Christie's wheelhouse. I think that their styles complement each other very well. I like his chances since he's been rarely mentioned of late. Romney wants to have that WOW factor and I'm sure that their campaign has put out a whole lot of false leaks to ward off his real choice.

This is pathetic even for this board. I hate to break it to you, but Obama has been a colossal failure. In a few short months, Romney will blow the doors off Obama. I suggest you either try to deal with it, or at the very least refrain from starting an idiotic thread in which you call a politician who's telling the truth, a person who's just made a gaffe. Face it, you have nothing on this guy and every time you try to cook up a plan to ruin his chances with a fake scandal, you end up looking like a chard and smoldering Wile E. Coyote. I'm shocked that there are still people with functioning brain cells in their head who still support this loser. It reminds me of the feuds with the Dick "it's hard to win" Jauron supporters. The unqualified, inexperienced and unknown Obama was given a huge chance and he proved his harshest detractors right. Romney is the next person in line to be given the chance.

The American people are going to punish those members of congress who aren't doing their most important duty and that's protecting this country. McCain and Boehner picked the wrong horse on this one. They're more worried about being called mean names than doing their jobs. The muslim brotherhood are enemies of this country and all those people in DC who are turning the other way for whatever reasons are going to get voted out of office.

This "story" may not be over. Romney's concerns about the UK games could very well be proven justified... http://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/olympics/archery/9431496/London-2012-Olympics-hundreds-of-fans-turned-away-from-archery-after-turning-up-without-tickets.html ...and yet again the MSM will play the part of Wile E. Coyote in the 2012 presidential campaign.

The man has been pretending to be something he's not. He's not a "moderate", "bring the country together" "we're not red or blue states, we're the United States" kind of a guy that Americans were sold on. In fact, he's the polar opposite of that. He has a deeply seeded belief in the socialistic (and most probably communistic) forms of government. He's repulsed by the idea of an American government being geared towards rugged individualism. He thinks it's the government's roll to play robin hood. He really sees people as stupid helpless masses who need to be taken care of their whole entire lives. Don't believe me? His record says it all. It's why people call him anti-American, because it's the truth if you're someone who sees America based on standing for individual freedom rather than based on standing for the community good. If you want to see where Obama's far left, liberal, radical, socialistic, twisted-thinking path leads America to, just take a good long look at Detroit.

Obama is a fraud. His autobiography is fraudulent, his past academic excellence is fraudulent, his qualifications were fraudulent, and his sympathy for the middle class is deeply fraudulent. The three times Obama hasn't been a fraud and where he let his true feelings show where his "cling to guns and religion," "spread the wealth" and "you didn't build that" campaign moments. He's a far left president who had been brainwashed by radicals his whole life. The only stupidity here are the middle class Americans who bought this fraudulent "hope and change" act four years ago.

They want a president who will destroy the capitalist system so a guy that's actually worked with money is actually a negative to them.

Is there anyone here who doesn't think that more and more, Americans collectively feel like a 17 year old teenager who have had enough of their "Mommy and Daddy" telling them what to do and are awaiting their 18th birthday? Our collective birthday is Tuesday, November 6, 2012. This story of citizen rebellion in a very blue state seems to crystalize the anti-liberal, anti-nanny state feelings boiling up in this country… http://boston.cbslocal.com/2012/07/22/some-humarock-residents-discuss-seceding-from-scituate-in-bonfire-dispute/

Really? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2007–2012_global_financial_crisis "On September 30, 1999, The New York Times reported that the Clinton Administration pushed for more lending to low and moderate income borrowers, while the mortgage industry sought guarantees for sub-prime loans: Fannie Mae, the nation's biggest underwriter of home mortgages, has been under increasing pressure from the Clinton Administration to expand mortgage loans among low and moderate income people and felt pressure from stock holders to maintain its phenomenal growth in profits. In addition, banks, thrift institutions and mortgage companies have been pressing Fannie Mae to help them make more loans to so-called subprime borrowers... In moving, even tentatively, into this new area of lending, Fannie Mae is taking on significantly more risk, which may not pose any difficulties during flush economic times. But the government-subsidized corporation may run into trouble in an economic downturn, prompting a government rescue similar to that of the savings and loan industry in the 1980s.[45] In the early and mid-2000s (decade), the Bush administration called numerous times[46] for investigation into the safety and soundness of the GSEs and their swelling portfolio of subprime mortgages. On September 10, 2003 the House Financial Services Committee held a hearing at the urging of the administration to assess safety and soundness issues and to review a recent report by the Office of Federal Housing Enterprise Oversight (OFHEO) that had uncovered accounting discrepancies within the two entities.[47] The hearings never resulted in new legislation or formal investigation of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, as many of the committee members refused to accept the report and instead rebuked OFHEO for their attempt at regulation.[48] Some believe this was an early warning to the systemic risk that the growing market in subprime mortgages posed to the U.S. financial system that went unheeded.[49]"

I think there are varying degrees of security clearance. Being a top aide to the Secretary of State is far different than being a translator or the position of the person you were talking about working with. If the aide passed the investigation and direct family members are not part of radical muslim groups than what's all the hub bub going on with this story?

Guilt? It's more like how the heck did she get by a security clearance. Seriously, do you believe that this aide or anyone else should have access to classified government information if their immediate family has ties to radical islamic organizations? BTW, I'd feel the same way if someone had family members with ties to an anarchist anti-Ameirican organization filled with lilly white radicals.

If Secretary Clinton's aide has direct family members who are in the muslim brotherhood, then she should be excluded from holding any position with the ability to obtain classified information. I've never been a fan of Bachmann, but we're talking about our national security here.

I heard that D'Souza mentions Obama's early mentor Frank Marshall Davis in the film. I found this article today which discusses a book coming out on the subject of Davis (who's full name is never given in Obama's book btw)... http://www.wnd.com/2012/07/communist-mentor-obama-backers-trying-to-hide/ "If you want to hear Davis in Obama’s rhetoric and ideas, you can begin with Obama’s vow on the eve of his historic election to bring “fundamental change” to the U.S. – the exact term Davis used to describe a communist revolution in the U.S. Really makes those provocative statements of Obama saying "you didn't building your business, somebody else did" seem like the first true hint of transparency coming from this president.

Pretty much anything is racism to the liberals these days, so asking for his college records would provide for them a fairly easy way to connect the phony "look, he's a racist" dots.

I think Obama and Co. are trying to bait Romney into making a mistake like asking for Obama's college transcripts which in turn the Obama campaign and MSM would use to paint him as racist. Like, "Oooooh, so you don't think that Obama is smart. Why is that Mr. Romney? You don't think that black people are very smart, do you?" Romney needs to take the slings and arrows, dispute the claims in a respectful and dignified manner, then go ahead and make the bold pick of Chris Christie as his attack dog attorney/VP partner. I really think that Romney needs both "protection" and a "pulse". Christie would be able to hammer the left in a VERY effective manner. The Obama campaign/MSM are going to lie, cheat and steal to make Romney look like Darth Vader. For instance, when asked about the accusation of Romney being a possible felon, Chrisitie would pull out a great one liner like, "These accusations are silly. I can go to my neighborhood chuck e cheese and find a five year old with a longer rap sheet than Governor Romney."