JimBob2232

No, I do not believe one second that the president is responsible for the behavior of the stock market. But I am sick of people talking about how great the market was because of Clintons policies. People forget that the market pretty much tanked towards the tail end of clintons term, and has been stagnant during bush's term, but somehow clinton gets alot of credit here and bush gets slammed (due to his policies). I intentionally phrased my previous post to make that point. I understand the DOW is only 30 stocks...but it is a widely used indicator of stock market performance (ESPECIALLY amungst the bush is bad for the stock market crowd who dont know better) and tracks fairly closely with the S&P. The point remains the same if the S&P is used vice the DJIA.

Sorry, didnt see the other post. I did a search for 'food' not 'menu'

Whats on YOUR menu? Mine: Pizza, Meatballs, Chips, Nachos, Artichoke Dip, Vegge Platter (for the ladies), Shrimp and Cheesecake.

Too bad its like 70...

IF he fails, it will be due to his inability to handle critisizm and the culture of the NFL. He has the talent, and will develop if he can keep his head in it. And I think he can.

Ask yourself this question. How has the stock market performed under george w. bush? Answer the question then click on this link for the answer. http://moneycentral.msn.com/investor/chart...t=Refresh+Chart I understand stock market does not (necessarily) indicate economy growth.

I was really expecting to see a listing of "Jim Rome is burning" and "Quite Frankly"

Exactly. This is my policy: Vote Libertarian or Constitutional party unless the election appears to be very close, then vote republican. 3rd parties hate me because I dont automatically vote for them...but I cant let us be peroted into 8 years of bill clinton again. (and I assume the dems will say nadared into 8 years of bush).

His Brother Mo?

So his options are 1) Work and Get paid 2) Dont work and get paid. Doesnt seem like such a tough decision after all!

I think this would require 2 bumper stickers.

I know this does not seem like a priority, but if Moulds IS let go, are you really ready to go into next season with Josh Reed or Roscoe Parrish being our #2? And our only depth being Aiken and George Wilson? Evans/Reed/Parrish...wow, we really need some size.

http://sports.yahoo.com/nfl/news;_ylt=AvJN...ov=ap&type=lgns "A woman answering the phone at Mularkey's house said he was unavailable." Gee.. I really hope that was his wife!

More proof its atlanta http://www.citiscapes-art.com/cities2/atlanta.htm For arguments sake..here is philadelphia http://www.citiscapes-art.com/cities2/philadelphia.htm and here is what they SHOULD have used http://www.citiscapes-art.com/cities2/buffalo.htm

Duh. I still cant believe someone (or a bunch of someones) actually sat around and said "ya know what...I bet if we federalize airport security, we can do a much better job at a much cheaper price" Morons. Name ONE area of government where they actually do a good job of responsibly managing their finances.

Of course they can always change the rules...but I dont believe they will because its not in the best interest of the NFL to allow public ownership.

Because the league is money hungry. I'm not saying it will happen, but by making the bills a publicly owned team, it can NEVER happen...and im not sure that will sell well with the NFL, especially whaile tagliabue is there... Now condi... At any rate, I dont know how much thought these guys put into this...my guess is not much. Besides the picture of some city other than buffalo, they plan on raising "10,000,000 shares at $100 per share." or...cue dr. evil...one billion dollars. I dont know about you, but somehow i dont think the bills are worth that. Its an interesting idea. One which if done properly and professionally MIGHT warrant attention, but for some reason I dont think these "players" are up for the task. And a domed stadium...pfff...please.

Sadly...no. Any sale of a team has to be approved by the league. The league would not approve such a sale because it might not be in the best (read financial) interest of the league to have a team in buffalo vice Los Angeles or Vegas or wherever. The NFL has allowed Green bay to be a publicly owned team, but it is HIGHLY unlikely that this will be allowed for us.

Wow. Good game. Great game for the big east!

Does it? Duke has come back pretty nicely here. Good game. Duke down b 4 with 2:35 left....

Yeah, louisville is a tough team to get a read on. All their losses (except st johns) have been to ranked teams. They win the games they are supposed to, and lose the games they are supposed to. They havent really defined themselves to me either. They have a fairly easy big east schedule left (if there is such a thing when playing uconn twice and 5 games against ranked teams)... We shall see. And 14 is alot, even for a duke team to overcome. I am sure they CAN do it..but I hope they don't!

Im not so sure st johns wont make the touny. They are 10-6 right now, with 2 big wins (Louisville and Pittsburgh). If they can make a good showing against the rest of the non-ranked big east schedule (i.e. rutgers, depaul, seton hall, providence, georgetown, marquett, etc..) and pick up one more win against ucon, wvu, syr or villanova, they could make it. Big east will put 7-8 teams in the tourney IMO. IN: UConn, Villanova, Pitt, WVU. Likely In: Syracuse, Louisville Probable: Marquette, Cincinnatt, Georgetown Possible: Rutgers, St. Johns, Notre Dame Out: Depaul, Providence, South Florida, Seton Hal

Though CBS needs to get their act together. This is a horribly produced game. Music starts at ranom times....screen goes black ocasionally... G-Town up by 7...4 mins left in 1st

Was up by 10, duke came back to tie it. Right now its 22-22. Could be a very good game.

First of all, you cant go by this. If you found this same poll in 2001, the top name would be Al Gore. Its a name recognition contest at this point. Everyone knows who hillary is. Same with John Kerry and John Edwards. Same poll in 2001 would show them both in the 1-3% range. 2nd issue is that she is imploding right now. Plantation, Belafonte, etc. She keeps this up she will be hurting not only in the general electoin but the primaries as well. Long way to go, but she is really going out on a limb to make herself appear crazy. The biggest mistake democrats made in 2000 and 2004 is putting up horrible national candidates. Bush is a below average candidate, but he could run circles around kerry and gore. It was so easy to do. A chimp could have beaten bush in 04, but they dug up kerry. IF the democrats get their act together and put up someone good for national debate, a likeable candidate with a history of bipartsan support, they can beat a decent republican candidate. And I would be happy to support him/her. All im asking for here is a chance to not pick between two horrible candidates interested in political power and instead focus on the future of america.