bills_fan

The article really summed up the Bills and what they could/could not with Bledsoe. Absolutely true, but if Drew is protected then look out. The guy can still gunsling. Dallas's starting OL.... LT Flozell Adams (2nd Rd pick Cowboys) 6'7", 343 LG Larry Allen (2nd Rd pick Cowboys) 6'3" 325 C Al Johnson (2nd Rd pick Cowboys) 6'5" 296 RG Marco Rivera (6th Rd pick Packers) 6'4" 310 RT Rob Petitti (6th Rd pick Cowboys) 6'5" 347 These guys are all homegrown except Rivera, all massive, huge blockers, that can protect Drew and give him the time he needs. Now, will he probably self destruct in a road playoff game, yeah, likely, but still...he's playing damn well right now and MAY get Dallas into the playoffs. Same with Mularkey's (with the short passes) and for that matter Killdrive (throw every down). If we had a decent OL, it just may have worked. But thats been the core of the problem with this team in the entire TD era. Just try to get by with the line and focus on the skill guys. I hope that changes this year, cause without that line being fixed, there will be no SB's for Buffalo...ever.

This is from the article. You could re-write that statement like this... Once upon a time Gilbride was Buffalo's Offensive Coordinator of the present. But the coach didn't coach the offense as much as he battled it, and the results were disastrous. Not only did he sabotage the team; he cost his head coach his job.

Happy B-Day...I'm right behind you in losing my 20s :-(

Pepsi spit all over my monitor!! LMAO!!!

Right & the team will have that money, and more to give to Nate. We're saying the same thing. My bad, I thought Posey was up this year. He's helping the D, but if you need the money for Nate, then release him. My bottom line is everything revolves around Nate.

This is completely accurate. As a huge U fan, I watched every game WM had in college. Basically, he was just as patient waiting for the hole to open as he is now. Then he'd hit the hole and be gone for 10-15. Now, he doesn't have the same speed he did at the U, but it seems he's compensated by adding strength and bulk. So now when the hole opens, he'll hit it and go for 4-6 and try to power forward for another couple. Problem really is that the holes didn't really open much with this OL. I'd like to see us with a healthy CV and MW, we'd have some success there I think.

2nd vote for post of the day!! And, BTW, its legal in Nevada to pay for it. It should be pretty much everywhere. And to the guy asking about your daughter, if I raise my kid the right way, she'll be a doctor or something and won't have to be a hooker. There are jobs for everyone.

More than that. After Teague and Posey come off, it'll be another few million for Nate.

Hey, maybe he can eat up some space against the run. It says he was pretty good at clogging up running lanes. With the rest of our D overpursuing, and allowing huge cutback lanes, maybe this guy can help shore things up. Give him a chance.

Thats one helluva stat!!

The thing is, even with Losman, if TC had called Willis' number a few more times in the NO game, I think we win that one. If Willis had 31 carries against that run D, we'd be 3-2 with me playing QB.

I could see a shake out like this... LT - 1st Round Draft Pick LG - Gandy/Anderson C - Preston RG - Villarial RT - MW Villarial & MW worked well last year together, and I think they will this year again. They just need to stay healthy. As for DT, I agree, one of our biggest needs. Either a FA (although if we tag or re-sign NC, we won't have much $$ left over), or a 2nd Rd Draft Pick. I think spending some picks on D (except the 1st rder) will pay major dividends in the years to come. We need a DT, CB, S, and LB. I think Posey will be gone with Haggan or Crowell stepping in. Behind NC & McGee we are a bit thin at CB with Thomas out. S is self explanatory. We may have top wait a year to draft Fletcher's replacement, as we have too many other needs. Just my $.02

Run Willis 4xs. Then the next time you're down there, run Willis 4xs again. This includes all 2nd and 1, 3rd and 1 and 4th and 1 plays (on their side of the 50 for the 4th and 1). You want to be a power running team (and I love that philosophy & think its the best way to go), then put your money where your mouth is.

We can turn out the votes for "Tailgate Nation", lets turn them out for Ralph. Lets send an email to everyone the site suggests and let them know why Ralph should be in the Hall. Its time, let do it.

Then I guarantee you we will win the game.

Can he play on 3rd down?

I don't care if they like sheep as long as they win a friggin game!!

Marcus Price couldn't play anymore b/c of bad knees. I think he's retired. Not sure about Tucker, been wondering that myself.

Man, you think??? I mean, he's been gone since 96 & never adequately replaced, but you know even as old as he is, he has to be better than what we have. I'd certainly love to see it.

Not wrong at all. Especially if we beat the Felons & Jest, we'll be 3-3 and maybe, right back in it. I'm an optimist by nature and believe that will happen.

Couldn't agree more. McGahee should be getting 30-35 carries a game. Eventually the D will wear down and we'll be hitting for 10-15 yds a pop. That opens up the play action, stalls the rush etc. Instead Clements wants JP to fake everyone out. Just awful.

1995 AFC Divisional game. With Bruce, we win and prob go to 5 SB in a row.

Ya know, this is a familiar refrain. Why are we always begging for coaches to run the friggin ball. First it was Killdrive, now friggin Clements. I wish w'd re-hire Joe Pendry, at least he believed in running the ball. At all levels of football, the team that runs the best, usually wins. This is not rocket science. They want to prove how friggin smart they think they are. Awful.

The next two games will define the season. Both divisional games, at home. We need both em to have any shot at having a decent season.

Only been to Cancun once, stayed at the Oasis for Spring Break in college, during the MTV filming of their Spring Break show. Incredible!!