Billz4ever

You go right ahead and be happy with the way they played the second half. I'm not. And it should've been by at least 20, but we decided GBs offense was the Curt Warner Rams and decided we needed to play nickel to stop the passes they weren't doing anyway.

When was this? GB was doing what worked since their receivers are their weak link. Frazier was playing like we were playing the Curt Warner Rams.

We all saw the plays the Bills were making the second half. Can we please stop sugar coating the fact that the Bills played a lousy second half of football and instead of putting them away with our D, we let them gash our D instead of making them beat us with the weakest part of their team, their receivers. The Packers are a bad football team right now and we made them look better than they are.

The Bills played a terrible second half and instead of making the other team beat us with the weakest part of their offense, we somehow decided letting them gash our D on the ground was the better option. Makes zero sense.

Instead of making them beat us with their weak receivers, we allowed them to gash our D on the ground. Makes no sense at all.

If the OPI is not called (and plays like that are not at least 50% of the time) and Crosby makes that FG, there's no need for an onside kick. The game would've been tied on the FG. We were not comfortably ahead and the people here claiming we were, were just like everyone else in that Stadium...it wasn't until Crosby missed that FG, did people breathe a sigh of relief.

You mean ripping off 10, 20 yard runs at a time? Those are a good as a pass. This game was a Crosby missed FG and fairly weak OPI call from being tied.

And there it is. Playing scared against a team whose receivers are their weakness instead of making them beat you with them.

Handing us the game? GB was doing what they knew they had to do because they knew their receiving corp is trash. Frazier was acting like their receivers were "the greatest show on turf" reborn.

When you're ripping off 20 yard runs, how is that any different than throwing 20 yard passes?

So they have to lose for us to question why they were allowing GB to rip of 10, 20+ yard runs repeatedly and playing nickel when the formations said run? And why Frazier was playing like he was scared to death of GBs receivers, when their receivers are their weak spot? That game was a Crosby missed FG and fairly weak OPI call from being tied. You're making it sound like we were comfortably ahead. We weren't. It was the way WE were playing that was the reason we didn't know the game was over until Crosby missed the FG.

I wouldn't exactly call ripping off 10, 20+ yards runs dink/dunks. A fairly weak OPI call and a missed FG were the only thing keeping this game from being tied. GBs weakness is their receivers. You make them beat you, not give up the equivalent of long pass plays on the ground because your play calling is too rigid. There as no reason to be in nickel all night, especially when the other team isn't passing much and their formations show run down after down. What we saw last night was a form of prevent defense, except they were giving up huge chunks of yards on the ground instead of through the air.

A puzzling move for sure. It's a move a team that has decided to throw the rest of the season would make. If that's what they're doing, they are beyond clueless.

Yep, let Josh be Josh and do what he does. Indecisiveness there is what got him and it ended badly. The run was there and he knew it was.

Definitely very un-Josh like this season. On the INTs it almost seemed like he wanted to run, but hesitated and decided he'd better not and then threw a bad ball. It seemed as though the line was in constant pass rush mode even though the formations GB were in still said run. Linemen were taking themselves out of their gap assignments trying to get upfield and that made opening holes easy for the GB line and RBs. Happened repeatedly in the 2nd half. I thought Motor and Cook looked fantastic. We should've been feeding them all night long.

Oh, you're still in denial about last year. How's the coping coming along?

And? We beat them last year too. Different story when the chips were down, right? Poor D coaching decisions cost us the game.

If they play like that against the Chiefs, they will lose. That's just a plain and simple fact.

The Packers were fortunate? What...that we played pretty bad in the second half? That performance on both sides of the ball the 2nd half isn't going to get it done against good teams. The Packers are not a good team right now.

And against a good team, that performance isn't going to get it done. The Packers are not a good team right now and that win was ugly.

Load up on the run? How about simply not playing Nickel against a team with a less than stellar receiving corp? This game was a missed FG and a close OPI call from being tied.

I'm sure you're not since you'll just pretend you never said it or try and explain how it's "different" this time. I'm counting on it.

The Aaron Rodgers and Packers that have lost 4 in a row and are 3-5 on the season. Shouldn't have to be said, but they aren't a good team right now. We were literally playing against special teamers at LB the second half.

You just said, it didn't matter if it was run or pass, so whether it's the run tonight or playing the wrong D against the pass against KC and Mahomes in 13 seconds, you can bet your butt this will be thrown in your face.

So according to you if Rodgers was ripping off those yards it wouldn't matter because they didn't score. Terrible logic because against better teams, they would've scored and just to prove my point this thread us being bookmarked to be later revisited. I can't wait.