I mean, this is not bad: "Bottom Line: In frigid conditions, the team that executes the run game effectively and avoids turnovers will have the upper hand. The Bills’ experience in the cold is a big intangible, but you can’t ignore Henry’s ability to dominate if given the chance. It’s shaping up to be a classic cold-weather slugfest!"
But it all reads like a bunch of received wisdom, with major factual errors no human fan would make ("Diggs and co"). There isn't a sense of real understanding or any new thoughts.