Jump to content

FireChans

Community Member
  • Posts

    12,612
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Recent Profile Visitors

13,979 profile views

FireChans's Achievements

All Pro

All Pro (7/8)

9.9k

Reputation

  1. I hope you’re sitting down…. But he was traded for a second, just a few weeks ago. Lmao
  2. He’s better enough that no one reasonable could even argue he ISN’T better. As for the consequences,, I would be 100% fine with not signing Josh Palmer and 2 more DL depth FAs who got popped for PEDS and are gonna miss 6 games and MAYBE missing out on Sander to have DK on the roster. Unequivocally. Right now, could we package Palmer, Hoecht and Ogunjobi for a 2nd round pick? Of course not, because they aren’t nearly as valuable. But guess what? Their cap hit combined is MORE than DK’s this season lmao.
  3. Mooney is a far better player though? Tell me you don’t follow the league without telling me you don’t follow the league
  4. Oh my god, no Josh Palmer. Perish the thought lol
  5. Yes but more importantly, neither were FA’s.
  6. KJ Hamler wasn’t good enough to break through last year or the previous 4. I was a big KJ Hamler fan coming out. And yeah, I think he sucks. We have guys with size on the PS. We have Eli Ankou. We have developmental CBs who make the roster, like Ingram and Cam Lewis. Why did we need to draft their replacements? Is it… because those guys suck?
  7. Those guys suck. maybe a guy we draft doesn’t suck. isnt that the same logic for every player we draft?
  8. Does this mean we should never draft anybody on Day 3? What is this take Of course he did. All QBs help all their WRs. But the Pats in all their dynastic glory still drafted more WRs than the Bills did. Clearly they thought the position was at least kind of important. The Chiefs draft more WRs than the Bills. Clearly they think the position is at least kind of important. So we have two teams that have won like 9 SB's between them drafting more WR's than us. Maybe we should emulate them? Maybe?
  9. The Pats used to draft WR's. Often. Steelers with Big Ben a better example. A WR every year or every other year in rounds 2-4 kept a stable of talent around Big Ben for the second half of his career and imo prolonged his career.
  10. You know how every is praying "maybe Coleman takes another step next year" We could have had two or 3 bites at that apple.
  11. The passing offense in 2024 wasn't bad. The passing offense was hyper-efficient, with Josh playing at an MVP level. The WR's were kinda bad though. 2020 Diggs/Beasley/Davis/Brown had 277 catches and 3559 yards 2024 Shakir/Coleman/Mack/Cooper combined for 156 catches and 2052 yards Which WR group was better and contributed more to the offense being super good? It's pretty obvious. No one is arguing you can't have a good or even great offense with crappy WR's. We just did it last year. The Chiefs did in 2022. That doesn't make it not crappy. It just means you are making hay elsewhere. Its why even if the defense is good, a guy like Hamlin can still suck. Just because the defense is good doesn't mean everyone is good.
  12. They played 1 more game than the 2020 team did. The 2020 team averaged more PPG. There's your explanation. If the 2020 team played 17 games, they would have had more points than the 2024 team.
  13. Well then why did you even ask lmao. You got dunked on, now you are trying to backtrack. Extremely funny, and extremely sad.
×
×
  • Create New...