daz28

Yeah, sure it's Hill, but he doesn't seem to have his deep down field speed.

Damar got beat.

We could use Micah back

I think the issue is that this "doxxing" has happened to lots of people. Heck, we follow the Pegula jet on here, and Elawn never got mad about that. I also don't see the "stalker" aspect either, because there's literally probably no safer place to be than an airport. Will everyone be suspended for doxxing the Bills jet coming home after they win the Super Bowl? Lastly, the information is freely accessible, so he's just banning people, not the information. So yeah, he IS being a hypocrite man child.

So much for Tweeting pictures of anyone anywhere that reveals their location, which is pretty much every picture ever. Very well thought out rule.

There's a concern with conditioning, but there's also a bonus of being not banged up. Same with Brown. Seems like we're going to go quality over quantity, which we probably had do anyways. They're familiar, so low cost good chance for a return. Think I'm gonna crack open an ice cold b-easley right now!

Just a note that what Jesus said is actually what Jesus was believed to have said AT LEAST 20 years after his death by the most conservative of estimates. I find that the precision of the statements is AMAZINGLY concise, especially considering it was translated again to English in 1611.

More importantly, let's tie this to housing discrimination. The cake decision is based on: Justice Clarence Thomas, in an opinion joined by Justice Neil M. Gorsuch, accepted this argument and said that forcing the baker to make a cake would be impermissible compelled speech. He wrote: “Forcing Phillips to make custom wedding cakes for same-sex marriages requires him to, at the very least, acknowledge that same-sex weddings are ‘weddings’ and suggest that they should be celebrated—the precise message he believes his faith forbids. The First Amendment prohibits Colorado from requiring Phillips to ‘bear witness to [these] fact[s],’ or to ‘affir[m] . . . a belief with which [he] disagrees.’” Now, here's where the bible stands on homosexuality: The Bible says: “Men who practice homosexuality . . . will not inherit God’s Kingdom.” (1 Corinthians 6:9, 10) It seems that renting half your duplex, and witnessing this sin day in and day out, would be more of a sin than baking a cake for a wedding. If you want to really complicate this matter, look to conscientious objection to military draft, or even paying taxes that support a defense budget. This is EXTREMELY more complex than the few nonsense posts here have even touched on.

Is this stat weighted by how much a team throws/runs,or is it raw data. If not, then I wonder where the Bills are if it were weighted?

If you plug all of the factors of yesterday's game into the equation, that number changes drastically.

So if I get this right, the people are arguing today that those who felt it was inciteful were wrong, after they were basically proven right by a riot/insurrection??? The claim must be that it was coincidental, and they just happened to get lucky by predicting it? I'm really just curious how it's not a violation of the 1st Amendment for the DOJ and White House(both government entities) to be involved with what should be censored on Twitter??? Yet the same people are arguing that private citizens, lobbying groups, Twitter, as a corporation, and its staff ARE bound by the 1st Amendment. This is pure Cuckoup land.

The bible is a big enough book that through selective interpretation, one could probably find a way to back all kinds of discrimination quite easily. I guess the Supreme Court will just handle these on a case per case basis, unless they just want to roll with the all selective interpretations matter principle.

Is anyone here an English teacher? I'm not, but I have written enough college level papers to have a basic understanding of how it works. The 'massive fraud' I'm assuming Trump is talking about is the 2020 election. If so, then the statement SHOULD have been written ""A Massive Fraud of this type and magnitude ALLOWed for the termination of all rules, regulations, and articles, even those found in the Constitution". That is what I believe Trump is claiming he meant to say, but it still doesn't make sense, because absolutely no one believes "ALL the rules, regulations, and articles, even those in the Constitution" were allowed to be terminated. Now, we could suppose he also incorrectly added the word "all". I suppose he could have made some attempt to explain what he meant by "all" of the rules, regulations and articles that were terminated, but instead he chose to cry 'fake news twists my words'. My personal opinion is that he was trying to justify his attempt to get Mike Pence to go against the 12th Amendment, which states verbatim: 'the President of the Senate shall, in the presence of the Senate and House of Representatives, open all the certificates and the votes shall then be counted'. At best, he poop tweeted a terribly written statement, and at worst he was attempting to justify a possible crime. It's intriguing that this post came right after the White House lawyers testified to the grand jury(s). That's what I based my opinion on.

They'll build on this. We ain't used to having both

Ellicottville apple pie shine. Cheers

Operation Bobby Hart fall forward engage

It's on the D at this point. How much give is too much?

So far so good. Don't play vanilla on Parcells becuz of injury. He can smell that stuff

Not possible. He was a meat zombie

If we keep playing HS football, Parcells will try a fake

Both. One zombied back to the huddle

The line is definitely banged up no question.

If it happens I'm doin a shawt

Don't worry, he'll plant them eventually. Then look out

He still manages to make the most out of the spills tho. Got like 2 after that one.