daz28

Mr. Roth should challenge Mr. Jordan to go ahead and put his accusation in writing, so he could see him in court later. Playing to uncredible accusations your base wants to hear is one thing, but taking a slander to libel is another. Mr. Clay Higgins is another one in wayyy over his head. This LSU dropout horse rancher: Rep. Clay Higgins (R-LA) accused a panel of former Twitter executives of allowing the FBI to help Joe Biden by suppressing "criminal evidence being revealed" via a story about Hunter Biden's laptop. -what criminal evidence would that be??? "You people interfered with the United States of America's 2020 presidential election, knowingly and willingly," Higgins said. "That's the bad news, it's gonna get worse," he warned. "Because this is the investigation part. Later comes the arrest part." -By withholding a story for 24 hours to verify?? They want so bad for what they think is going to be true, to be true, that they forgot that stumping for campaigns, and investigations are two completely different things. Ideally, during an investigation, you ask the questions that will help prove your accusation, but all they're saying is, 'you did it', and they're under oath saying, 'no we did not'. I wonder how Mr. Higgins feels about Mr. Eastman attempting to halt the congressional electors count under what he admitted he knew were false pretenses? I doubt we'll ever find out.

Apparently, Chris doesn't like people giving so much "testimony" under oath??? Personally, I'd love to hear some sworn testimony from more people, especially those who were asking for pardons, but I guess subpoenas aren't what they used to be(for both sides).

So you think he's lying, even though potentially all proof of this is in the hands of someone who would just love to blow it all up??? If you'd like to join Jim Jordan in that, then that's your choice. I'm going with the guy who bet 5 years in prison that he's not, for now. All the Twitter files did was expose that all kinds of people are in their ears trying to censor, and that's from both sides. If I did have a major concern with that, it would be that the the White House, and congressmen were in on it, too(from both sides). Imo, that is censorship. Fwiw, here's the whole quote from Scalia, "I think Thomas Jefferson would have said, "˜The more speech, the better.' That's what the First Amendment is all about, so long as the people know where the speech is coming from," he said on CNN's Piers Morgan Tonight. "You can't separate the speech from the money that facilities the speech." -I'm guessing, from my interpretation, that Mr. Scalia believes that people with more money would also have more free speech then. He obviously missed the word, 'abridged' then, because that would mean that people with less money would indeed find their speech curtailed(abridged). Not a Scalia fan, but here he's clearly getting something wrong.

What he said is undoubtedly true. Facebook and Twitter are literally living proof that 4chan, and all of its spawn, drive away users(less speech). He admitted the 24 hour holding of the story was a mistake. Apparently, Mr. trump feels that 24 hours proves the election was, "RIGGED AND STOLEN". By who though, Twitter?? Seems like a pretty insane stance, by a desperate man, to me. Not sure how communism ties in here???

Jim Jordan gets KO'd in the first round with sworn testimony that the FBI didn't direct the 'censoring' of Hunter's laptop. He continued to push the narrative anyways, saying he "thinks" they did. Roth testified Wednesday. “I don’t believe that perspective was shared by law enforcement — they didn’t endorse it, they didn’t provide that information in that meeting.” Roth added later in the hearing that "a representative of another tech company may have mentioned it" but "I truly don't recall."

Now that shove was just plain dumb

The loss of Purdy was not an unforced error. Reddick was running wild and free, and that is something SF had to prepare for. They also needed to challenge that catch.

I agree with this, but SF somehow thought they wouldn't have to block an elite rusher. That was massive mistake #2

Did you see the drop, the calls and the fumble by the backup QB?

If he can throw that would make it 3 MASSIVE mistakes by Shanahan.

He ain't coming back

Yeah, "getting away with one" shouldn't be an option in the playoffs. No one will be mad about it taking too long to get it right.

This could have been a game for the ages, but the niners forgot the first rule: PROTECT YOUR QB

There was a foot in the way from him being able to scoop it in

Confirmed, esp RT.

14 carries for 70 yds?

Bit of a hold by 69

Run left seems to be the play for the Eagles

You couldn't see one w/o seeing the other

That ball wasn't in the air. Not interference

Wonder if Kurt Warner has any friends down at the A&P?

Like trying to tackle a rainbow trout

That one deke tho........

He fell, but still got the line barely

Is he ruled out for the game?