The Red King

Actual math statistics, from a college course... ...what are the odds of getting a 'heads' on a coin? 50%. Now, lets say you flip a coin three times and manage to get 'heads' three times. What are the odds you get 'heads' again? 50%. Because the prior flips that already occured have no bearing at all on the next flip. So no, we do not need to lose the turnover battle on purpose to raise the odds against doing so later.

That "deer in a headlights" look on the kid's face choked me up a lil, not gonna lie.

Agreed. I can see both arguments. But I stand by KC potentially missing the playoffs outright.

We've put up 30+ points a game, all three games this season. Last season opposing QBs could set up lawn chairs and sip lemonade waiting for receivers to get open. I think we're okay on offense, and understand the focus on defense. Just gotta get healthy on D.

Ravens. We currently hold the tiebreaker, and they're going to make the playoffs. KC is in a weird position where if they continue to implode they may not. That, and KC can still nab the tiebreaker with us if they beat us. If we meet the Chiefs in the playoffs, I do *not* want it in Arrowhead yet again.

Yeah, division games always make me nervous. I still remember most every year the 'Phins took down the Pats at home no matter how good Brady and the Pats looked otherwise. I'll chuckle at this thread, but not gonna put us at 3-0 just yet...

The Red Carpet? The Turnstyle?

31-27 Buffalo

Buffalo destroyed the Pats early one season, week one if I recall. Brady threw four picks, including one Adams returned with all the glory and gracefulness of a bowling ball going down a flight of stairs. ...the Pats finished that season with a total of two losses and a Super Bowl ring. It's one game.

Honestly, I was dreading a new uni, but I actually really like these. Not as a new main uni or anything, but they're at least thematic for Buffalo. I prefer them to the red jerseys.

Our pass rush was nonexistent last season. If you try and fix it, the best you can do is get enough players to fix the starting 11. You can't get enough players in one offseason to not only overhaul the starting line, but also provide depth. All yesterday proved is that if our starters go down, our pass rush goes with them. Alarming, yes, but not unexpected. Now if the season begins, and our starters can't get to the QB, *then* I'll push the panic button.

That doesn't sound right. Go into the draft a year early, don't like who takes you so you say, nah, dude, and try again next year?

You made my point. I was never down on Josh. I saw the same flashes. But, onto your memory, do you remember these forums that year, calling him "Wrong Josh" and a bust? The point to my reply was that a year is nowhere near enough time to fully evaluate a draft pick.

Diggs is exactly what Josh needed at the time. Then, Josh outgrew him. Still think it's smart paring him with a young QB.

It's one year. One. Anyone remember Josh's rookie year? Beane really dropped the ball on that pick, didn't he? 😁