Jump to content

Ol Dirty B

Community Member
  • Posts

    3,209
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Ol Dirty B

  1. Does anyone have a screen grab of that Sammy tweet? Sent my brother a text because he reminded me of some people we know and I know the gist of it... but the exact quote would be so much better
  2. Let's take it easy on this... You're jumping to crazy conclusions in that post. You're accusing him of addiction, diagnosing him, prescribing him meds. The video is bad, but no person on earth is qualified to do all of what you did off that video.
  3. I was always a sammy fan... but wow, what the !@#$ is that tweet. He sounds grade A nuts... He has gone off the deep end too.
  4. Yea I didn't think so from what I remember... Kids just laid there and ****.
  5. Oh yea? You saw this coming?
  6. Do people over 18 smoke that?
  7. No... I've never ran around naked in public, fought my brother while yelling I want to fight for jesus then try to kick open a window on the 30th floor. Anyways, I wonder how messed up his feet and hands are with that blood all over the place.
  8. He's lucky his brother has better hands...
  9. The charges look like the least of concerns really. What the !@#$ is wrong with dude? I agree Synthetic weed is a possibility, but holy !@#$
  10. The eagles got to that Superbowl by trading away a ton of picks to get to two and not even be sure of which QB they'd get. They just wanted one of the top two prospects. It's the complete opposite of what the Bills are doing if they don't get up to two. I hope the drought didn't bother you that much, because that's planning for another playoff appearance in 2035. Also, I don't want him, but Rudolph won't be there in the third.
  11. The Browns GM also said to call him about the number 1 pick. I dont think that's happening at all. I also never said the Giants wouldn't trade out. I'd apologize for misrepresenting your sorry excuse for a thread if you didn't do the same in an even worse fashion. I don't find discussing what ifs that are definitely impossibilities as interesting. But their is a whole genre of fan fiction and things like that dedicated to this kind of stuff. So you're clearly not alone.
  12. So this was the basis of your thread? I can't believe I wasted my time.
  13. You're delusional. This whole thread is ridiculous. No one is treating Bridgewater as a franchise QB, that's why he signed what is an awful contract by QB standards. If no one else was offering more than 500k for 1 year, he is clearly not the plan and they won't restructure after the draft. Secondly, after making that trade, they won't convince anyone they aren't after a QB. Giants won't trade with them, Browns won't trade 1. They made a decision they are fine with any of their top 3 QB prospects in this draft. The smoke screen isn't about position for them, it's about which QB. The whole premise of your theory is just dumb.
  14. Don't believe that was his point at all. You really had to stretch for that one. Your last paragraph is only accurate if they do what you want them to do, or what you said you would reserve judgment on, get up to 1 or 2. I think only 2 is Even remotely possible. Even if the guy is a bust, they had a plan and executed it. Otherwise the firesale was for nothing.
  15. I don't understand why I've heard this. Why on earth would the Browns tell us what QB they are going to draft, and on top of that, truthfully. It makes no sense.
  16. I just hope this is Miami's Dion Jordan trade all over again.
  17. It was clearly a fail, when judging by the results. He's not on the team anymore. I don't even understand why this is a thread. I wish it would have worked out better, and I love how now everyone knows Odell would have became what he is. The rest of the receivers in that draft aren't better than Sammy, or just as injury prone. No one saw Odell being what he was and what he could become in that draft. It's annoying to read the people with 20/20 hindsight talk about receivers in that draft. Could you imagine this fanbase dealing with that dude? It'd be so ugly.
  18. That's a horrible idea, and I'm going to chalk it up to your avy as to why you... a} Like McCarron b) Don't know what good QB play looks like, because it's not coming from the Bills or Alabama c) Undervalue QB play because your college team is in contention to win it every year with mediocre to below average QB play because they field great players on both sides of the ball all around that guy. We've done that here, no thanks. I want who they think is the best QB prospect. Not some other version of half assing it at the position.
  19. I don't think it's just the lack of Bills perspective... They have the Jets taking Chubbs at 3 lol.
  20. Wow that's crazy like I said happy for the OP. Seems like he's amped.
  21. That was 30 years ago man. Come on. No there isn't. This logic is so convoluted. You have a lot more busts who had 60% completion because guys in the 50's aren't really even looked at as top prospects most of the time. For every guy who is 60 and above who didn't make it, their are way more in the 50s. Most of them probably didn't even get a chance to play consistently. I mean can I include all the QBs that were never even given a chance in the NFL who threw in 50% range? It disqualifies guys now days. Unless you're an athletic freak, in terms of being 6'5 and able to throw the ball with velocity a mile. Your discounting success because that success earns a chance to fail at the next level. Then arguing on behalf of lesser performance. It's insane.
  22. Congrats, I'm a bit lost though. Are the tickets free? Are they a hard ticket to get? I always just assumed that if you wanted one, you could find one and it wouldn't be that expensive. Didn't think it'd be that in demand. I always watch it, or flip it on and off with something else, just never had the desire and assumed not enough people did to make it a tough ticket.
  23. So many things wrong in this post. First of all, we are saying these things because we learned from 2004. We aren't saying we knew this in 2004. Everyone says the Bills were going to take Rothlisberger at 13. He was their guy. What a coincidence, we are here at 12 and he was taken at 11 in 2004. If he was your guy, at that position, you have to go up and get him. If you are confident enough that he is your prospect, I don't care if they say you over drafted immediately at that time. What matters is the next 12 years. It's not being hysterical or crying, it's just this is a waste of time if the moves have been to go a combination of LB, CB, OL, WE, RB in the first. Then your post goes into some weird defense of the Losman pick. He's not marginally worse of a prospect than Darnold, Mayfield, or Rosen. Even Jackson too. You say it yourself, you said he'd he a 2nd rounder if it wasn't for the Bills. 3 top 10 guys are a hell of a lot more valued than what you claim Losman was seen as by most of the league. Then you for some reason brought up Matt Schaub. I don't even know what to do with that. I mean are you seriously arguing that we should have wanted 10 years of Matt Schaub? What a stupid argument.
  24. The OP said all those things in his theory. Otherwise what do the Bills have to do with the Jets trading up. Douche.
×
×
  • Create New...