MJS
-
Posts
15,878 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Gallery
Profiles
Forums
Events
Posts posted by MJS
-
-
The media love affair continues. I just don't get it.
Never mind that he ranks near the bottom of the league in TD's and yards every single year.
40 minutes ago, Hapless Bills Fan said:I dunno, Meanie, color me skeptical of this argument. The Bills did indeed have a stout D, some of the time.
But I'm thinking most of the teams in our "Team Defense" neighborhood of "meh" are in the same boat - some good games, bunch of average games, 2-6 games where they got blown out.
I don't think you can argue that Taylor benefited from defense above average in not having to score as many points as the other QB, when the team D falls below average on points
(18/32)
Taylor is average some of the time, and below average most of the time. And a few games where he is terrible.
-
1
-
-
We need quantity just as much as quality. I am against trading away high picks unless it is for a QB. You can find plenty of starter caliber players right where we stand in the draft, and that's what we need.
-
6 minutes ago, Wayne Arnold said:
In my much younger days I found that I was a much better drunk driver than stoned driver. But that's just me.
Hopefully you didn't kill anybody.
-
No thanks to Bradford. He has to be the richest QB to never play.
-
Friendly reminder: You are all slowly growing older and inching towards death.
Just in case you forgot. You all looked a little too happy, which is not allowed.
-
Didn't even mention rookie Milano. Instant contributor there as well.
-
1
-
-
15 hours ago, YoloinOhio said:
Yes. Their DL is loaded.
Well you can't be all pro if you are just a rotational guy. That's my point.
-
10 hours ago, plenzmd1 said:
This seems to have never been an issue in college, why do you all think it would be dramatically different in the pros?
WR's run wide open in college. Defenders are better, faster, smarter, etc in the NFL.
1 hour ago, Rubes said:Plenty of arguments against this throughout the thread.
And they are wrong. PI spot foul is fine the way it is.
-
15 hours ago, reddogblitz said:
This strategy worked well for the Ravens when they dumped Trent Dilfer after they won SB and replaced him with Elvis Grbac.
One small data point.
-
He is a rotational guy there, right?
-
Because, like everyone has said forever about this, it takes away the deep ball. No defender will allow a catch over 15 yards. They will just mug their receiver and take the penalty if they even think there is a chance of getting beat.
-
On 1/14/2018 at 3:52 PM, LA Grant said:
If we were the Jags, there'd be countless threads like "Blake Bortles still can't throw for 300 yards! We're never going to win with him!"
That's because Bortles sucks. Their entire offense is designed so that he is as small a factor as possible.
If the Jags win the Superbowl, I bet they still try to find a new QB. If the Bills would have won the Superbowl, I bet they would too.
Because both QB's are not good enough. You want a guy to rely on, not a guy to avoid.
-
It makes the Bills look better if the Jaguars do well, honestly. Then it makes our loss to them look not as bad.
We held them to 10 points, and they just put up 40+ on a perceived super bowl contender in the Steelers.
-
2 hours ago, Gugny said:
Personally, I think the O Line has been very good for the past 3+ years. My concern is age/effectiveness. Incognito and Wood, specifically.
They have been a pretty good run blocking line, but not very good in pass blocking. Yes, Taylor has had the most time to throw, but I attribute that to his mobility and escaping the pocket.
Peterman got fed to the wolves when he started. He had no time to throw.
46 minutes ago, dneveu said:He does take really good care of his body - if he wants to keep playing and continues playing at a high level I say let him. I'd actually consider extending him to lower the cap hit this year if he plans on playing in 2019.
If the coaches think Groy is not a drop off, I would consider that, but I am against the idea of cutting a pro bowl starter just to save the cap space, considering we are not incredibly tight on space right now . We aren't the browns.
We need to keep our talent that has bought in to the new culture. Haven't seen a drop off in his play yet. Besides, we can always ask him to restructure.
-
Nobody comes close to Rice. His stats are just insane. Plus all the super bowls, pro bowls, etc.
He's had a good stretch of seasons, but he'd have to do the exact same thing for many more years, which is asking a lot. He is losing his potential HoF QB soon too.
-
The right side is still not good. Eric Wood and Incognito are getting old. We should be drafting olinemen every year until it is completely overhauled, in my opinion.
-
2
-
-
1 hour ago, Jamie Muellers Ghost said:
The Pegula's need to tell there kids to shut up, AGAIN! It comes to a point where telling sources insider info whether true or smokescreen become hurtful and more so embarrassing to the organization. Kim, I hope you are listening.
It doesn't hurt a thing. The only thing that matters is what happens on the football field.
-
8 hours ago, Wayne Arnold said:
That's why I said AFC dynasty, not NFL dynasty, Einstein.
Unfortunately there is no such thing.
-
5 hours ago, 26CornerBlitz said:
Mind your business. The other person responded to me. Now bug off!
You tell him! Tell them all!!
-
7 hours ago, Wayne Arnold said:
the losing team of the previous year's Super Bowl will not make it back to the big game.
Not since the 1993 Buffalo Bills has an NFL team managed to get back. And as we know, they accomplished that feat three times in a row.
Once again, time has proven to be very kind to the AFC dynasty of the 1990's.
Can't have a dynasty unless you win the big game.
-
10 hours ago, PolishDave said:
So using your criteria and stats posted.....
Percentage of times teams found a decent Qb in
1) Top 10 draft picks 45% (teams decided they absolutely MUST have this qb)
2) Round 1 - picks 11-32 18% (teams decided they want the guy but won't trade up hardcore with first picks for him)
3) All round 1 picks combined 34%
4) Rounds 2 and 3 combined 18% (teams think guy might make a franchise QB, but serious question marks)
5) Rounds 4-5 8% (unlikely to become Franchise guy soon but take a shot because he has enough upside chance)
Fun interpretation:
Based on these odds it makes sense for the Bills to trade down with both of their first round picks so that they have at least 3 first round picks next year. Odds are they get a guy because 34% each guy drafted.
Or:
Take both first round QB's this year. If you don't hit, take one in the first next year.
Or
Take one first rounder this year.
If you don't hit, take one first rounder next year.
If you don't hit there, take one first rounder the following year.
Whoever came up with the idea of taking a QB in the first every year until you hit on one is a genius.
Nope. It takes you at least 3 years to know if you have a good QB or not, so if you take a bunch year after year how do you evaluate them?
It's not Madden. You can't see their stats right after the draft.
-
Wow LeBron. What a burn. You sure showed him ...
-
I don't care what they have to spend. If they believe Cousins is a franchise guy, go try to get him. If you don't think he is, don't even bother. Draft a 1st rounder high and bring in a vet to play while he develops.
I personally think Cousins is a good QB and I would not be unhappy if they brought him in, regardless of price.
-
1
-
-
I'll just trust the process ...
Kiper Mock Draft: Josh Allen #1
in The Stadium Wall Archives
Posted
I sure hope Allen goes #1 overall. Better chance for the Bills to get a better QB.