MJS

No

And yet, I said it.

Meh. He isn't that good. No thanks.

Very true. They haven't been good since the early 2000's.

Getting attention and people talking about all the wrong things and not about cancer.

That looks like nothing to me. You can't even see his hands when he passed him. He could have given him a quick five and then went to Kelce.

It got people talking about boobs and the appropriateness of ads, not about cancer. If anything, their approach distracted from their goal.

Who is transitioning to man coverage? The Bills?

Crosby would be amazing. Two years younger than Garrett, too.

Yeah. That one too...

Ok, I like boobs as much as the next guy, but I sure didn't like them airing that commercial during the superbowl when my kids were watching, and there are kids all over the nation watching. I guess I am old fashioned, though...

I've found Ravens fans to be pretty insufferable this year. And, of course, Jets fans are perhaps the most delusional. She has become what she used to sing about in her early years: "She wears short shorts, I wear t-shirts, she's cheer captain, and I'm on the bleachers..." She used to be a normal girl, and now she is a complete elite, fake, feminist pop star. I find her pretty distasteful now. But I like some of her music, admittedly.

Benford getting hurt was also a big factor. We went from a really good corner to a shaky, mistake prone Elam.

They did it by playing the Bills normal defense. Except they have the dline to actually get pressure.

That's not what I said. I said they did not just play soft man. Yes, I did also mention that they blitzed a lot in my first post, because they did. But keep doubling down. You're wrong on all accounts. In fact, it is the exact opposite of what you claimed. So, now you are just trying to drag those who pointed it out through the mud instead of owning up. Typical Einstein.

The Eagles got pressure with their front four and dropped everyone else into coverage. That's why they succeeded. It is what McDermott has always wanted to achieve.

I didn't mention pressure at all. What are you talking about?

Yep. Wrong about what the Bills did and wrong about what the Eagles did.

The Bills were very aggressive a d they didn't just play soft coverage. You're just wrong about that. And apparently you're wrong about what the Eagles did, too, haha. So this entire premise is just completely false. The Eaglss played zone the entire game.

That's not what the Bills did. The Bills played a ton of man coverage and blitzed a lot.

Yeah, the bad calls I saw went against the Chiefs.

That would be cool. They are at least skilled musicians.

Or at all 😉

We'd be able to run it.

Does anyone like this crap? Barf.