Zerovoltz
-
Posts
1,623 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Gallery
Profiles
Forums
Events
Posts posted by Zerovoltz
-
-
My worthless 2 cents. I think it will be Peterman. ....it could be McCaron, but the important thing here is that the question being asked should be Allen or someone else. The someone else part doens't really matter what their name is or who they are. Some of you posting here have mentioned that Allen was drafted, knowing that there will need to be some time to develop. that has not changed. he's been mostly running with the 3's. He's also lived up to his scouting report. Big arm, athletic. smart. looks like the god of QB's in a no pressure practice type situation (like he always has) I'd venture to say that at some point in the season he will start, but not game one...here is why:
1. The Bills opening 8 games are so are brutal. Let one of your low dollar, not in the future plans, scrub QB's take those hits and losses. No need to expose Allen to the brutal speed and harshness of the NFL over these first 8 games.
2. The Bills offensive roster isn't very good. I'm not a Bills fan as you all know....just objectively looking at your roster on the offensive side of the ball...it's frankly pretty bad. Again, let the other QB's come in and have to work with this less than optimal talent level to start with. Perhaps after 8 games, the talent level won't be much better but at least there will have been some time for the O-line to develop some cohesiveness and maybe some guys emerge here and there.
3. There should be no illusions that this is a playoff team, and certainly not a contender at this point. Let the other QB's take the wrath of the fans and media while Allen remains the golden boy in waiting, the great hope of the future, unstained by what will probalby be a pretty miserable opening to the season. Bring him in when the fans and media no longer are clinging to any hope that this team is has any realistic post season asperiations.....Then the focus can be on watching Allen and seeing how he does game to game..hopefully finding tangible evidence of improvment until the end of the season....giving you something to be hopeful about in 2019 when they can also spend to improve his weaponry, his o line...another draft...etc.
You all like to point at "the process". Starting week 1 would be kind of anti process. sacrifice Peterman and McCaron so that Allen can have the best shot at sustained success (if he is ever to have it)
Week 1. Someone not named Josh Allen.
-
1
-
-
5 hours ago, Jay_Fixit said:
I see horrible footwork, off balance throws and things that will get him into trouble in games that mean something.
Watchig that clip makes me cringe. He’s like a marionette with a strong arm.
He isn't off balance on either throw. unlike many QB's who will spin away and run when the outside rush is collapsing the pocket, Mahomes goes forward, keeping his eyes downfield...and delivers a strike right on target. The other play he moves around in the pocket...again, his eyes scanning the field the whole time as you can see his head progressing through targets...he sets and throws a lazer 20 yards downfiled right on target. He isn't off balance on either of these. I can show you one where he doesn't set his feet and tries to use nothing but arm to throw the ball deep downfield and it ends up being underthrown, but it isn't these two plays. Anyhow....interesting how you see a QB doing everything wrong on these two plays and I see a QB doing what you'd want an NFL QB to do in both of them.
-
3 minutes ago, Jay_Fixit said:
This is a joke.
Jay Fixit...please....break down what you see in the GIF....I am very interested to know how you see this.
-
43 minutes ago, Jay_Fixit said:
It’s going to be a **** show.
So...he takes a snap from under center, does a play action fake, turning his back on the defense..things he is supposed to suck at....he climbs up in the pocket, looks right then whips a pass to the left to the open man while moving forward...this is bad? That is everything you'd want the QB to do on that play. The second play, he takes the snap, LOOKS over the field, sets his feet and WHIPS a pass 20 yards upfeild to the open man.....LOL....yes, this IS why we are excited.
-
1 hour ago, John from Riverside said:
I absolutely did
And
I absolutely dont care
You traded away a good veteran QB and pushed all in on a player that has done NOTHING yet
None of that is disputable
You aren't wrong....but you are simplifying it just a little bit by saying he has done "nothing". It would probably be safe to assume that everything he has done since drafted, on the practice field, in the classroom, in preseason and in the Denver game....compelled the Chiefs to feel good about trading away Alex Smith who they still had under contract one more year. I don't think they would have done that for "nothing". It would be reasonable to expect that no matter what anyone says, fans, pundits etc...it is clear the Chiefs coaches and brain trust think they have "something".
-
1 minute ago, John from Riverside said:
You know the funny thing is I have absolutely nothing against the Chiefs as long as we are not playing them.....
but
The Chiefs are really gambling with their chips all in on Mahommes......who has done nothing yet to show this kind of trust. To me trading away a established veteran was bizarre......as your veteran QB was better then our veteran QB that we traded away for a 3rd.
Mahommes has a nice situation with those targets......I dont have that same confidence in your OL.....he didnt play under Center in college.....he didnt look great when he got his opportunites as a rookie.
We didnt feel it was the time to take a QB....I was very happy with getting Tre and punting to the next draft year where I felt the QB prospects were better.
If Mahommes starts the year and does well.....and Josh Allen does not start the year I wont feel like we lost the trade one bit. Different QBs....different situations.
Good luck to Patrick
You didn't click on the link and read the article, that is full of plenty of video breakdown...detaling why they traded smith and why all the hype.
-
3 hours ago, TonyBeets said:
Mahomes is a generational talent had me cracking up!! You will be missing Alex Smith very soon!
https://www.theringer.com/nfl/2018/6/19/17477286/patrick-mahomes-hype-train
-
As a few other said...he signed with KC for the money. If KC had Matt Cassel at QB this year and we (KC) offered that contract, he would still be a Chief...and he would say something like, I feel like Andy Ried's O is the best fit....95% of players in any sport, select the contract that pays the most...there are few exceptions here and there to play close to your hometown, or you've been with a team so long you give a bit of discount to stay put...but 95% of the time...it's the money....players say and do stupid things all the time, but it's amazing that none of them ever just say it was about the money....it's especially baffling that in hip/hop black culutre...the way money is celebrated that most of these guys don't just come and brag all about the money.
-
2 hours ago, BB@Shooter said:
Zero....I saw Allen in person in 16 games or somewhere like that. And the rest on TV. I have seen every BYU qb come through the last 30 years. I saw both Carr's and Dilfer in person. I saw Dalton and Smith in person. In other words I have seen a lot off qb's in my years. That is just the tip of the iceberg.
I would like to see Allen play, but know that sitting him would be best. He is used to poor line play and below average receivers, so he can probably handle what is thrown at him. I would have loved to see Mahomes try and play at Wyoming, it would have been hysterical. People need to let it go until he is in pads, then you will see the leadership and toughness. The guy knows how to win. He put those Wyoming teams on his back and carried them. Old hat to him.
Well...then we seem to be in agreement about Allen at least...I am strongly advocating that he sit for now....and I am not disagreeing with what you saw Allen do at Wyoming...it's why I think he should sit...that environment was not one conducive to training a QB up to make reads, throws from the pocket. He has nothing but a history of low completion pct..so I don't know if he'll ever improve.....you'd think there'd be a pattern of progress there as most QB's display in college...but I digress...when you take a ton of reps and most of those reps are running around and trying to find open slow targets...that isn't good prep for the NFL....good prep is what he is getting now and he needs to repeat this and work on it on the practice field and in the classroom. He has the tools that everyone wants..it's why he went in the top 10 of the draft...big arm, big body, athletic, mobile and smart..and by all accounts a good leader...everything you'd want...I'm not telling anyone here anything new...the scouting reports all say the same thing.....if he is ever going to be more than a great prototypical tools guy...he needs quality reps with quality coaching and players around him...his college experience did not provide him that.
-
1
-
-
40 minutes ago, BB@Shooter said:
Are you still drunk, or has the rot gut whiskey begun to shut down your mind?
GaryPinC is seeing what I am seeing.
BB@Shooter....curious to know your thoughts on Allens development...should he sit? should he play now? What do you think about what you've seen and hear about him so far?
4 hours ago, John from Riverside said:Ppl see what they wanna see
your qb didn’t look great in year one in th limited time he got and came from an air raid offense in college you may end up regretting the trade that sent your starter away
Submitted without further comment.
-
Just now, John from Riverside said:
Well if he says it it must true lol
It's not just that.....but if you study it....and better yet....just take in the reality that they traded Smith away, when they didn't have to at all...for this guy....it speaks volumes.
-
9 minutes ago, John from Riverside said:
Well let’s hope so became so he looked like crap in his minimal time last year
-
7 hours ago, Hapless Bills Fan said:
I'd like to drill into this a little bit because I'm not sure I understand your analysis. It sounds as though you're saying it doesn't matter if a guy sits, but then saying Allen should sit.
Which doesn't make sense, and you seem like a sensible guy, so perhaps could you reiterate your analysis or link the post where you did it?
I personally agree that Allen should sit for a year, be sure he has a thorough understanding of the playbook and the game and what he'll actually see from NFL defenses by game film and VR analysis (I hope the Bills are using this), and also have a chance to refine and solidify changes to his mechanics before he goes into "live action"
I wish nothing ill for the Chiefs, unless they're playing the Bills LOL - they're currently the only NFL team in my state after all! BUT, I'd wait until Mahomes has done something to proclaim him a generational talent, myself....for the Chiefs sake, I hope they're right Mahomes can play in the NFL since they did trade away a very competent NFL-quality QB - but "Baby steps man", let him play a few games first
Hapless Bills Fan -
Last year, in some Chiefs facebook groups I post in, I was looking at the Sit Vs Start now debate raging about Mahomes at the time. A lot of people were just throwing it out there that Mahomes should sit because he was a rookie and needed to learn. No one...not armchair internet guys...not paid sportswriters....no one ever supports this with any data....they just throw it out there like it's a forgone conclusion that a rookie is better of sitting....but is that really the case? It's a tough question to answer because plenty of awful QB, never see a field because they are awful...and plenty of awful QB see the field because they are a high draft pick....so the best I could do was to take the STARTING QB's from the last 20 super bowls. This gave me a sample size of several long term starting QB who are considered to be good to elite for the most part. It also has a nice cross section of high first round picks, a few other round picks and an undrafted FA all in that grouping.
The idea was to check the QB rating for each of these QB's over the course of the first 16 games they started in the NFL. IF sitting was a benefit to a NFL superbowl caliber QB, you would think that among this group, those who sat signifigant time to start their career, would have a highter QB rating over their first 16 games started, having sat an learned, practiced more before starting out, etc etc.
What that data actually shows is that of that group of super bowl starting caliber QB, their QB rating over the course of their first 16 games was basically identical. the sit and learn group was actually a point or 2 lower in QB rating than the start from day one group. The most telling thing about the data to me was that the rating for these guys was almost the same on average for the their frist 16 games.
The data says that if a QB is going to be good/great, it is because he had the talent to begin with and that over the first 16 games of his career, he does NOT gain an advantage having sat. He learns to be an NFL QB at the same rate as the guy who started from day 1 by BEING ON THE FIELD AND PLAYING NFL GAMES...not reading playbooks, not studying film....not watching someone else do it.
......and then YES...I go against my own analysis for Josh Allen and strongly suggest that to ME...in my opinion....is the rare guy who probably would actually see tangible improvement by sitting a year to start with....I do not think that Wyoming prepared him for NFL football at all. (I frankly don't think he'll ever be that good) ...but playing behind a poor line, with poor talent around you, means you repeated over and over again...a lot of things that didn't prepare you to be a good NFL QB. If all your reps were running for your life, throwing to slow targets, then Allen would be a guy who would actually benefit from staying OFF an NFL field on game day until he has made real progress on the practice field. No one is saying he doesn't have the build, the arm, the brains....but he simply doesn't have anywhere near the QUALITY REPS most others got in college football to be ready. To be CLEAR....Wentz, Goff, even Mahomes....got A LOT more out of their time in college football than Allen did. He needs this year to get right.
I'm not convinced he'll ever be accurate enough for the NFL...I didn't think he'd ever be before the draft, and I still don't....what I am SURE about is that he shouldn't be thrown out on the field now. That wouldn't be fair to him...and it wouldn't be fair to you, the fans of the Bills to ruin this kid because he wasn't ready.
To summarize. Yes, I think if you believe a QB is the real deal, he needs to start....Yes, I think Allen needs to sit because he is the exception due to his unusual college career.
And lastly....Mahomes is going melt your faces off this year.
-
***I am biased*** but being as objective as I can be here....
1. I don't want to lose site of the actual thread topic. This is a Josh Allen thread and about how he is doing. The reports coming out all match up with his scouting report. He has an incredible arm. He is mobile. He looks the part, and he is missing some throws. He is behind the others learning the playbook because the others have been here longer but he is catching up....high wonderlic score would indicate he can learn fast. This is ALL as advertised.....and he needs to SIT. I've done some analysis of QB's who started in the super bowl over the past 20 years and I looked at the first 16 games each of them started. The data in this case shows that sitting did not matter. A guy who sat 3 years had the same QB rating as the guy who started from day one over the course of the their first 16 games. It suggests that a super bowl starting caliber QB is going to be good wether he sits or not....and that the first 16 games of on field experiecne matter more than anything else. ......in the case of Allen, I would say he is one of the few who WOULD BENEFIT from sitting. His low completion pct playing at a small school, and the notion that he had a poor line and had to move around a lot suggests his reps in college were not very productive reps....in that he was often repeating plays where he had to run around etc and throw to less than decent targets....he isn't at a point where he would benefit by getting on an NFL field until he's had a TON of reps, in practice, with NFL level coaching, getting him prepared for the speed of the game, getting him used to the idea that he'll need to trust a pocket will be there and make reads to guys moving a lot faster. He needs to sit at least a year for all of this to take hold. Against the data, in this case...the exception is Josh Allen...there has never been such an obvious case for completely ruling a guy out of any plans to start for at least a year than this case with Allen. For the benefit of your team and your future....root for him to SIT.
2. Again...I am biased....and trying to be objective as I can....Mahomes is going to be a generational talent...you'll see it soon enough. If you draw your opinions on box scores, you are missing A LOT. Mahomes did have identifiable issues with his footwork, and he did make some glaringly poor throws in college. It's why he didn't go first overall...he needed some work. He got work. .....I can post a ton on this etc...but this is a Bills forum...I understand where I am here....I hope Allen works out for the Bills...I am looking forward to seing how it plays out in time. Lots of new QB talent coming into the leauge this past coupole seasons...very exciting times.
3. If nothing else....let Peterman or McCaron take the beating for the first 8 games at least. If you are honest about where the Bills roster is at this time, it isn't that great. Especially on offense. Let the kid sit...let the lesser guys take the pounding, and the wrath of the fans and media....then when he does get put into game action later on...the season will long be over, the team and fans will be ready to look at the remaining games to see what Allen can do and how he progresses...instead of looking at him as the guy who is going to save the franchise right now (he isn't ready!) SIT. SIT. SIT. Patience....and more paitience. Keep your shiny toy in the box for a while....
-
2
-
1
-
-
My 2 cents on this.
Before the draft, NO ONE anywhere was saying Josh Allen would be a day one NFL starter. If ever there was a guy who needed to "sit and learn" it is Josh Allen. Allen is the same guy today he was before the draft..a physical specimen with a powerful arm....who has CLEARLY IDENTIFIABLE flaws that need to be addressed before he would be considered ready to get onto an NFL field.
Allen is at MINIMUM a one year bench project and probably should be brought along even more slowly than that given what he is at this point. For comparison, look no further than Paxton Lynch. Go read his scouting reports pre draft a couple years ago..he was a "2-3 year project" with great size and arm who played in a spread BLA BLA BLA. They knew he was a project when they took him....and they got impatient and have given up on him already out there. I can't say it's justified to have given up or not, but it's a little unfair to call a "2-3 year project" a bust when you haven't given him 2-3 years EVERYONE though it would take to develope the guy. This is the danger with Allen. It is VERY HARD for a coaching staff to survive at 2-3 year development QB and see it though to where it pays off. If NOTHING ELSE, then ending the playoff drought last season might have bought your staff enough credibility and time to see it through....but that won't matter if the team is losing while waiting for Allen to be ready and the fans quit showing up...ownership will be tempted to compell the coaches to get the kid on the field NOW, or fire the coaches to placate the impatient fans. It's going to be a rough go. ....and after the time has been put in...you better get some results that show he is the QB to lead the team or a housecleaning comes and this all starts over again.
One other note....as much as I love Mahomes...and I think he could have started and done fairly well last season, KC had a pretty unique situation being able to sit the kid, work on his issues, while fielding a division winning team with a really good QB onboard already. Whole lot easier for even me, to wait while Smith was still leading a good football team.
Buffalo has a really rough schedule to start the year off. Let AJ take that beating..take the negative press, ....Allen needs work and reps...for at least a whole year....I'm normally of the shcool of thought that if a QB is going to be good, then he will be good wether he sits or not. ...this would be an exception. You drafted a KNOWN project...now let him go through "THE PROCESS" of being a project. If it is going to pay off at all, it has to be this way.
-
5
-
-
Not gloating, bragging etc...just repeating what I have heard locally from KC OTA's.....take it for what it's worth...it's practice....but Sammy Watkins made a couple of spectacular one handed catches (there is film out there, if you search twitter for it.) ...Lots of comments on how smooth and fast he is...sharp sharp route runner. I think KC overpaid by quite a bit for the guy, but he does have a chance to make it look like a respectable contract in this offense...going to be designed to find the open guy/one on one match up and expect that guy to win most of the time....can't double cover Hill, Kelce, Watkins and Hunt every play...someone will be in man or have a matchup to exploit...that is the idea anyhow...If Watkins can "win" his matchup, Mahomes can get him the ball. Watkins matchup win numbers with the RAMS were actually VERY VERY good (I can get the metric if you want me to go hunt it down) ....Goff didn't exploit his wins at a high pct. Anyhow...it's OTA's.....looking forward to preseason with pads on to get a real idea of what Watkins is going to look like in KC.
-
Just for clarification...when I said the "book is closed"...yes, that means all the moves, picks etc have been executed...so now we know who got what and who went where.
-
2
-
-
Just now, 3rdand12 said:
whaleys scouting
McD is a defense guy and likely waiting for Beane to get settled before laying down the stack on the poker table for future franchise QB
I absolutlely understand...and if I was McD, I'd probably have done the same thing...don't let the guy on the way out, lock me into a QB I haven't seen or evaluated and have that determine my fate....I'm not saying it was the wrong move by McD, but pointing out that these circumstances may come back and bite the Bills.
-
2 minutes ago, MarlinTheMagician said:
I have been so impressed by Beane and McDermott. What McDermott got out of the roster last year. Beane's gumption to try to go get a QB and many other things. Plus, one of the best things is they seem totally in-sync. It seems when GM and coach are not on the same page it is a formula for disaster even if, independently, the coach and the GM might not be on the same page. Our guys are. And I don't think they are just copying Carolina - they were buddies there, but not in charge. I think they look at Carolina and say "here are all the things Carolina did well, how can we do it better."
I think they may be the best Coach/GM pairing in the league. And even if not the best now, perhaps the best YOUNG coach/GM combo - a band that could play together a long time. Adding people like Dan Morgan only helps (quality people giving us a real football infrastructure).
Be interested in the board's thoughts. How do they rank overall as a pair? How about among young GM/Coach teams? I think these guys are awesome, full disclosure.
(yeah, I am trolling a little here) ....the set up for the 2017 Draft meant that the coach and GM weren't working together. Plenty of speculation about it all...maybe so, and maybe not...but it might have prevented the Bills from taking Watson or Mahomes....wich led of course to Allen this year. ....and we simply can not say yet if this was a disaster or not...but we can certainly point to this as a point in time when the coach and outgoing GM were not likely on the same page.
-
2 hours ago, Mat68 said:
College stats have never correlated to NFL success at Qb. Really there are 2 things, natural ability and drive. No one knows how hard a 20 something will work when they can have anything they want. Analytics got Clevelands lasy regime fired. They out thought themselves with Wentz.
I agree with your initial statement that college stats have never correlated to NFL Success....there is a long long list of college superstars who won trophies and put up "numbers" that bombed in the NFL. However, there is a stat that's been thrown out about completion percentage in college correlating to NFL failure.
Someone posted an argument in here in another thread about Josh Allen having not been raised up going to clinics and camps and etc etc....and on and on..and that he is only just now getting real coaching etc. I'd buy in 100% to that argument IF he had show improvement throughout his college career. The biggest red flag to me was that his completion pct was low at JUCO, and no one out in southern california thought they could coach him up..not even the minor players out there like Fresno State or SD State or San Jose State, who have put QBs into the NFL, and always get beat to the top talents by USC, Stanford, UCLA etc...they passed. Even still, Wyoming takes the kid. ....His completion pct sucked. it sucked again, and it never quit sucking. It would bother me a great deal to see that those mid majors out in California, again, who have put QB's in the NFL...Carr, Fales, ...didn't think they could coach that out of him. ....and then he goes to Wyoming, and those guys for whatever reason...failed to coach him up.
Now, I am looking at this from a far...so I am sure I am missing something here..but....The same coach (and GM) decided that a guy who had already has a 62.4 pct completion pct with 51 passing TDs against 18 pics, who has thrown for 9054 yards and rushed for 1700 yards and 15 TDs....that guys flaws can't be fixed......but they beleive they can "fix" Josh Allen? .....I'm not here to promote Tyrod Taylor. He may be Alex Smith light...not willing to throw downfield...takes off running out of clean pockets on 3rd and 8 and gains 3 and you punt....From what I have read, it may well be that Taylor had some of that going on....and if you decide that you are moving on from that...that is fine...it doens't change my point.
The coaching staff couldn't fix the NFL QB who again has a stat line of 62.4% 9054 Yds, 51 TDS, 18 ints, 1700 rushing and 15 rush TD...but they can fix this other guy that almost no one thought was fixable, and then in college, didn't improve after the guys who thought he was fixable brought him into their program......
I really hope it works out for you all....you deserve a great QB.
-
11 minutes ago, Gugny said:
I'll maintain this forever: Had we kept Marrone and Whaley, this team would have been a perennial playoff team. We were a QB away.
Tell me if I'm wrong...but didn't Whaley like Mahomes?
-
To Hapless Bills fan. With Rosen on the board I would have thought the Bills would go Rosen, so yeah, I lucked into my Allen trade and draft. I only thought Allen because I thought Darnold Rosen and Mayfield would all be off the board.
-
Now that it's over....time to own up to what I said...(and take a little credit too) Here is my post from March 21st in one of the threads here....I really never much wavered from these...I posted this very same thing in many threads on this board....here it is for all to see...and for me to admit where I was wrong, and where I wasn't. Post draft comments are in bold.
My 2 cents.
1. Cleveland will take a QB. Not like anyone should pat themselves on the back for calling the obvious, but some here did think Barkley would go. no.1
2. NY will take a QB. They will do their due dilligence and field calls, but really they will stay where they are. The reality is, the 2019 Draft Class is going to be one of those years where ZERO QB's are drafted in round 1. It's that bad. The QB's coming out next year SUCK. The crop of potential QB free agents next year...SUCKS...compared to the bounty available this crazy offseason. Eli SUCKS....at this point. He wants to retire a Giant. I can see him accepting his mortality a bit better if he gets to finish as the mentor to his chosen successor (and not benched for Geno Smith) The Giants have considered all this. The most value they can muster from the 2nd overall pick....is to use it themselves. ROSEN. I was WRONG. I still the Giants are going to regret this.
3. The Jets will take a QB. Consider the situation in New York...they have a GM and a HC who are on short leashes. They DO NOT HAVE TIME to wait for Darnold or even worse, Josh Allen to develop. They moved up here to insure themselves Baker Mayfield. He will be ready to go day 1. He has had a billion college reps, he got better each year, he has a high completion pct. He is a big name. He has a Heisman. He is a charachter. He has JETS written all over him. ...and again...can't stress enough, he is ready to go day 1. The staff needs results sooner rather than later. I didn't think it would end up being Darnold...given the scenario that played out, if he didn't go 1, I was sure he would go 2. I was only right that this was for a QB, but that was obvious the moment they traded to 3.
4. Cleveland will take someone here not named Saquan Barkley. .....That front office just signed Carlos Hyde to good money, he is a Buckeye, and they have Duke Johnson, who has been one of their better players as the 3rd down guy on the roster. The same front office has a long history of not valuing RB high in the draft...and this one is full of RB....they can get a good one later, if they even think they need another one. We'll never really know if they would have taken Barkley here if were available. I don't think the pick would have been different...still would have been Ward.
5. Denver. No reason to be scared of these guys taking a QB....and not just becasue they signed Keenum....but consider they did sign him..to starter money. The coaching staff has been told publicly they have THIS YEAR to produce results. The Broncos still have a first round QB on the roster that Elway seems to have wiffed on, but he was supposed to be a 2-3 year project coming out. They re-upped their two WR. They are in win now mode with a coaching staff in win now mode...they simply aren't set up to draft their next QB...this staff isn't going to be around for that....they either win with Keenum or they are done and Denver will then go into rebuild mode. They will take the Guard from ND. Day one pro bowl starter at a position they need desperately. Rosen, Allen, Jackson...all on the board here...and they passed....and if Chubb hadn't been here, they would have traded out they said. They weren't ever in the QB market.
6. Colts. ...Buffalo could have offered them more than the Jets and I bet they did offer more....but as has been mentioned...Colts understand how this is playing out and at worst they will end up with the 3rd Best NON QB picking here. They will stay put. Yep.
7 bucs....another great NON QB player they like here. Barkley is my guess. I called the Bills trade up for Allen...I just didn't quite get the spot right..thought it would be at 9.
8. Bears. Spent heavily on offense in FA...take Davenport. Davenport went at 14...Bears went with very good and very safe Roquan Smith.
9. 49ers. This is where the action will be on draft night for Arizona, and Buffalo if they want something still on the QB board. I am guessing Josh Allen, Jackson and Mason Rudolph are what is left. Here is where the Bills move because Arizona will be trying to get up here too...and the Bills get Josh Allen. Again...i called the Bills to trade up for Allen...missed the pick by 2 spots.
Miami is not a threat to move up. They quietly restructured Tannehill a couple weeks ago...and parting ways with him will be cap hell the next 2 seasons. They also resigned David Fales... It can't be said with 100% certainty that they would have passed Rosen if he fall to them, but they certainly didn't make an effort to move up for him...took M Fitz...Tannehill is still their guy..and I think he always was going to be.
Watch out for San Diego and Pittsburg moving up to that 9 spot for Allen...and if they don't get that...both are major candidates to move around trying to get Rudolph. LOL....well Rudolph did end up in Pittsburg.
I do not think Jackson will go round 1. ....but he did....barely...so I was WRONG.
1. Darnold
2. Rosen
3 Mayfield
9. Allen (to Buffalo) Trade with 49ers Perhaps my best call of this whole thing...made a whole month out with everything in flux.
I will be taking a break from this place for a while...it's been great fun talking draft and QB's with all of you. This is my favorite place to come and talk football....can't emphasize enough the stark contrast of this place vs. other teams (including my own Chiefs) boards. Smart fans, who post well thought out topics and interesting comments. When the season starts, I'll be back again (if you'll have me) to see how Allen is doing, and of course to remind everyone how great Mahomes is every once in a while. I hope ultimately the trade is looked back upon by all parties as a good thing for everyone involved. I hadn't been a Bills fan before, but I'll be rooting for you on Sundays that you don't play the Chiefs and hoping that Allen turns into the QB you hope for and deserve. Best Regards.
-
6
-
1
-
-
The sling it part is what matters. At minimum, the Bills have people in charge who understand that the team needed a QB. Everyone has their opinion of Allen. That’s fine. The important part is they knew they had to get a QB and they got one.
-
2
-
77% were wrong believing our HC wouldn't be fooled by the mirage of preseason, but the Allen Era begins week 2!
in The Stadium Wall Archives
Posted
1. This really isn't related to my thoughts on Josh Allen but....
2. We expect Mahomes to have some days like this. He's running with the 1's. We are trying out several players at the C position with the 1's.
3. Mahomes is getting praise from all over the place locally, nationaly, other players, etc...having sat pretty much a year...and this being his first season playing...I am expecting there will be some times where we cringe...but at this point, completely expecting a dynamic, franchise QB over the coming 15 years...nothing at this point to say that isn't the expected trajectory.
I stand by my thoughts on Allen. He's an incredibly intriquing prospect because of his physical and mental makeup. On an actual football field, he has had some well documented issues with accuracy. I am willing to entertain the idea that Allens completion PCT can actually be improved by almost 10 pct even though that would be unprecedented. Allen could be coached up to a QB who could exceed the 60% completion pct threshold in the NFL someday but I'm only willing to think it possible if he gets a TON of reps, in practice, with NFL caliber players on the field with him, and good coaching. The only argument I will buy that he had the low completion pct in college is due to poor coaching, poor talent around him and that he spent a ton of his on field time playing sandlot football, totally off script.
Josh Allen is the very RARE case where if ever a guy could truly see tangible benefits by sitting and learning then he is it. For the sake of your future, for the sake of seeing this whole thing through the right way and to end up with a QB that can be a franchise 15 year guy....he needs to be solidly planted on the bench for the whole year....and at bare minimum, the first 8 games.