Stank_Nasty
-
Posts
5,438 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Gallery
Profiles
Forums
Events
Posts posted by Stank_Nasty
-
-
4 minutes ago, YoloinOhio said:
Bad organizations latch themselves to a playoff berth and say “that’s good enough, we made it” (Cough - mike brown - cough) and cling to the hope of 9-7 again and again with no real success in sight because of the limitations of the QB. Thank god our owners aren’t only concerned about ticket sales (mike brown, again) and our GM and coach are smart and self-aware enough to know the team isn’t getting past the WC round (if lucky to make that) with Tyrod. I’ll never understand the fans who feel average is all they deserve.
You can want more and still debate that Tyrod wasn’t an awful qb.
Is snyone even arguinh we should have just settled on Taylor at this point?
-
1 hour ago, ShadyBillsFan said:
Seeing the starter put up 4 pieces of ? in 5 games and getting benched for a guy not ready for prime time was amazing to you?
Getting out QB’d Blake freaking Bortles was amazing to you?
well. I guess if one were to look at it differently it was amazing how’s poorly he did. Amazingly poor.
The only stat that counts is
Wins and Losses
and most importantly Playoff Wins!
So this was your takeaway from a playoff season..... explains a lot actually.
I thoroughly enjoyed the season as a whole. Even being in Jacksonville for the loss. It was a close playoff football game. Great time.
Its also funny that after that pathetic lecture on what sucked about the season you reference all that matters is winning and losing as an argument against a qb that won more than he lost last year. You are consistently all over the place, man. It’s impressive, really.
-
10 minutes ago, John from Riverside said:
Your math is on Ryan
Your common sense is off (but this is not a new development)
Anyone that gauges productivity off passing yards is already lost
well its not really though. not as a bill anyways. that's 201 a game.... which leads me back to my original point of twoandfourteen looking like a tool for stating that a very good day for taylor was 200 yds passing.
-
1
-
-
2 minutes ago, reddogblitz said:
I thought last year was AMAZING to watch with all the wins and PLAYOFFS!!
Hopefully this year is at least as good.
right on man. thoroughly enjoyed the roller coaster ride last year.
-
1 minute ago, aristocrat said:
they always have a nice d and a decent offense but that offense has fallen off the past few years.
just checked. one playoff appearance in the last 5 seasons. yet every year its "watch out for the ravens". nah, i'm good.
-
is it just me or does anyone else think the ravens have been extremely overhyped year in and year out since their title run? they've made the playoffs one time since then right? I mean come on. its every freaking year they are picked to keep winning games and they never do.
-
4
-
-
1 minute ago, row_33 said:
Earl Campbell and Juice only had 5 immortal seasons. And immortal they were.
The RB role has fallen down a sinkhole over the last 15 or so years, it doesn't matter much any more for top teams.
I think its making a serious comeback though. 3 years ago I would 100% agree. but the feature back is most definitely making a return. couple years ago you could only name less than a handful of feature guys and now the list is getting longer.
Just now, row_33 said:he isn't even up to Bills Wall of Fame status.
well duh. he hasn't even played half his career in buffalo. that doesn't mean by the end he wont be.
-
7 minutes ago, Lurker said:
Only four career playoff games (all losses, with a 3.9 YPC and 1 TD) will make it hard for him to get in, IMO.
OTOH, if LaDainian Tomlinson can get in (10 playoff games, 5-5 record, 3.6 YPC, 6 TDs), Shady should as well. He'll have to play at least 3 more years and hopefully get a few more playoff games to pad the the resume...
OJ's talent was generational and transcended statistical norms. He didn't need playoff games to make his HOF case like Shady will...
I think one could argue mccoys talent is generational. not so much his numbers but his talent is. he's the only player over the last 20 years that comes into the discussion when you talk about guys that remind you of sanders. he's obviously NOT sanders but he's the only person I can feel okay about putting in that convo. he's most definitely been a top 3 back of his generation. I think he'll have a very strong case if he even just produces for 2 more seasons.
-
if he had to retire today there's no way he's getting in..... 2 more quality season and I can see it though.
-
3 hours ago, Teddy KGB said:
Did he though ? I came up with 158 ypg off a quick google search.
Was my math off ?
156 for his career due to spotty appearances in Baltimore. 201 per game in 3 years in buffalo...… which obviously nobody was happy with but lets not pretend 200 yds was a very good day for taylor just to try and prove a point. it was a dumb statement on his part.
https://www.pro-football-reference.com/players/T/TaylTy00.htm
-
1
-
-
47 minutes ago, MURPHD6 said:
Your idea of 'a real QB' needing to throw for 375 and 4tds regularly is entitled, unrealistic and silly. Its akin to being the creepy dude who only hits on girls that he thinks are 10's, and that dude never gets laid.
Also notice he claims Taylor is only throwing for 200 yds on a very good day for him when the guy averaged 200 pass yds a game over his 3 seasons here.
Dont bother with that clown dude. He’s warped. I’m totally cool with Taylor being gone but some of these dudes takes are just really really REALLY stupid.
-
39 minutes ago, PeterGriffin said:
Not all interceptions are bad.
Ball is at opponents 45 our QB throws a 25 yard int on 3rd and 15 while trying to make a play and fit it into a tight window, with no return and ball is on opponents 20 yard line.
or
Ball still on opponents 45, Schmidt, standing on his own side of field punts ball to 10 yard line PR catches and returns to 25 yard line.
Is that considered a bad interception? I don't consider that a bad interception. Yet if QB does that similar scenario half dozen times and ends year with, say 15 ints instead of 9 he is wrongly looked at as a turn over machine. Yet former QB who had same scenario would pass the ball for 5 yard gain or run around and gain 3 yards and still punt was considered better because he didn't throw ints. No!
As long as the QB is throwing for yards, which also flip the field and TDs, i'll be totally ok with double (8) or triple (12) the amount of ints that TT had last year.
Thanks for using one overly specific example to try and bail out a dudes dumb a** blanket statement that 3 and outs are the same as turnovers. Try telling that to the bills d back when they traveled to San Diego.
I’m personally not tore up at all that Taylor is gone but what that dude said is dumb. I don’t know the numbers but I would bet money that around 50% of turnovers End up wth the defense getting stuck with a way shorter field than what a punt would have netted
-
34 minutes ago, Circlethewagon8404 said:
I honestly don't know why Tyrod is excited. He's gonna be put in the same situation after this season when Cleveland decides to start Baker in 2019. I'll give Tyrod credit though cuz he does handle it well. I'm not too worried about the stats he put up, with the exception of his turnover ratio. Yeah de didn't turn the ball over much, but at the same time, how many 3 & outs did we have under Tyrod. To me, that's the same as a turnover cuz we couldn't push the ball down the field. Additionally, until he establishes himself as a clutch QB, he won't be able to make it in this league as an every year starter. He is still relatively young in his career, so he has the opportunity to turn things around, I do wish him the best. It just won't be in Cleveland. Sorry Tyrod, Cleveland already drafted your replacement.
Let me get this straight. 3 and out and a flip of the field is the same as a Potentially field shortening turnover?...
Geez, dude.
-
39 minutes ago, Shaw66 said:
Yes, I agree that we should be fine with Gunner's comment - the offense will be, and should be, conservative until the Bills have an offense that can win opening it up.
And I agree very much about the Steelers protecting Ben. Ben was something of a train wreck for several seasons off the field, and the Steelers had a lot of patience with him. I don't think Allen is likely to be an off-field problem, but it may take a while to get him up to speed as an NFL starter. McDermott is likely to be patient, so long as Allen is working at his craft and improving.
Up until about 2010 Big Ben had a god awful record when he had to throw the ball more than 30 times. I can’t exactly remember the exact numbers but his win % dropped DRASTICALLY. So much so that always remember the graphic popping up during games when it was happening.
He really was helped along for quite some time. During that said span he was just extremely freaking clutch. I mean I remember a good 3 or 4 year span when his numbers were pedestrian at best but there wasn’t a qb in the league I would take over him in crunch time. Heck, he was clutch all year back in 08 when they won the title and his regular season numbers were 3100 yds 17td and 15int.
People forget how long it really took him to be who he is now and how good the teams were that he used to have around him. I’ll buy a ticket on that train all day though..... again. That’s best case scenario, obviously
-
47 minutes ago, GunnerBill said:
I think until McDermott believes he has a top notch QB he will be that way.
And honestly I think we all should be fine with that.
I'm just spit balling in a dream world here but my best case scenario for this year is a poor man's version of the 04 "stillers". I live right on the outskirts of stiller country so ive seen a ton of that guy. Maybe the Defense takes that next step. Offense has a great run game and the rookie needs to make 3 or 4 WOW plays a game... and honestly the coaches and defense protected big Ben from himself up until about 2010 or 11. If we are thinking long haul here it may be that way for quite some time. Try and make sure the other units can pick up the slack while Allen gets his footing. If we are lucky he's around long enough for us to see that 10-12 year transformation.
-
1 minute ago, Hapless Bills Fan said:
, but does anyone think Keenum would have had the year he had in Minnesota under Dennison instead of Shurmer, and throwing to Thompson and Jones instead of Theilen and Diggs? I know I don't.
Same with foles
keenum ans foles were qb’s that stepped into absolutely loaded situations. Both players Around them and coaches.
I think we can all agree ours wasn’t that.
-
2
-
2
-
-
18 minutes ago, ShadyBillsFan said:
Tyrod
Bills fans
?
You WOULD read what Tyrod said as him whining.
6 minutes ago, ShadyBillsFan said:I will say it again.
Unless you have a franchise QB 99% of new coaches will want to bring in their own QB when that take over.
Taylor got a free year because of the ??? of available QB’s on the market.
Imagine if the Bills took the gamble back then and went after Foles !
No thanks on foles. Let’s see what he does without a dream team of offensive coaches and a stacked squad around him.
And I’m soooooo glad we didn’t pursue him this offseason for the eagles asking price.
-
1
-
-
9 hours ago, MJS said:
Yep. 9 sacks is pretty average.
Top 20 in the nfl and 8th among de’s for sack the last season he played isn’t average. It’s just not. Sorry.
Maybe just do a tid bit of research before you post, man. On paper he’s an immediate pass rush upgrade. White and the other db’s will look that much better with even just a slightly better rush.
-
1
-
-
4 hours ago, MJS said:
He has 15 career sacks over 3 years. Yeah, that will help, but it's not like he is some elite pass rusher. He's an average starter. Maybe he'll get better, though.
This post completey lacks context to try and prove a point.
The guys sack totals and playing time increased every single year up until his last full season of play in 2016 in which he had 9 sacks on the year. He’s gonna add immediate pass rush ability.
-
40 minutes ago, John from Riverside said:
Soooo eggs are ok? My market havin a sale and I was gonna load up.
Love to hard boil them and eat them with my no salt
whole eggs are extremely nutrient dense, however, they are also one of the most calorie dense so you need to be aware of how much you are putting in your body. whole eggs, taken within a healthy caloric daily limit, are more than ok for you. I would argue more beneficial than detrimental. Also saturated fats from most meats are not the enemy the 80's and 90's made them out to be. they have plenty of benefits. BUT like most anything else, people eat them in excess and so they have gotten a horrible rep.
-
2 minutes ago, NewDayBills said:
It's funny watching people debate veganism against ketogenic, both work if you follow the program correctly. It comes down to this: If you go high carbs, you must go low fat. If you go high fat, you must go low carbs.
It's that simple.
its actually even much more simple than that... its calories in vs calories out. PERIOD.
you are correct though. most any nutrition protocol will work when given any consistency.
now don't get me wrong. macro's can become much more complicated than that depending on performance goals. But as a fitness professional that is consistently having to keep up with the latest nutritional studies and health journals in order to keep all my clients(young athletes through senior citizens) trending in the right direction, I am getting a chuckle out of some of this stuff today.
I'm gonna go ahead and say people still terrified of eggs and red meat need to hop on back to the 90's and that's about all i'll say on this whole subject. Fitness/nutrition is a special field where very few people know anything but everyone thinks they know EVERYTHING. Science is finally catching up with the fitness/nutrition field and I can promise you if its proving anything its that there is no ONE way to get it done.
i'm gonna go back to lurking now.... there's just way too much to cover in this.
-
1
-
1
-
-
13 minutes ago, MJS said:
Really? How did you know Poyer would be a good signing? He seemed like just a depth signing at the time. Nobody knew he was good.
I, for one, cant claim I KNEW he was gonna be as good as he was last year, but if you were familiar with him coming out of Oregon st it gave you reason to be optimistic about the signing. I really liked the signing because years ago I remember him testing well at the combine as a CB and I thought he could be a very versatile player in the secondary if he could stay healthy as a safety.
-
so phillips graded out really well on their scale last year but then he's a reach in the draft at the tail end of the third? how exactly are we supposed to value their formula or grades when they don't do it themselves.... something doesn't jive there.
-
I think foles was in one of the most unique and amazing qb situations in the nfl last year with the coaches and team he had.
I guess I’m in the minority in thinking any team that tried trading early or mid 2nds for him dodged a bullet by the eagles declining.
Im personally real happy we didn’t spend any of our picks or money on foles.
-
2
-
Tyrod Taylor: I still feel that I’d done more than enough to stay
in The Stadium Wall Archives
Posted
That’s really really sad to me. Very fun season.