SoCal Deek

I’m nowhere near as sure. It’s possible that Beane is looking at the long term plan now, and realizes he’s got way too many 2023 holes to fill with way too little cash to fill them with. I guess we’re gonna find out.

I apologize for the late response but I guess you missed my sarcastic point. I’m hoping the real Bills show up to play in every game next year (which was definitely not the case in the playoffs against Cincinnati), including those games played after dark. 😉

I’m certainly no expert on campaign funding laws but I’ve seen being said there are more than a few ‘problems’ with the currently contemplated charges, including the statute of limitations, the standing of local Justice office in a federal election case, the reliance on a convicted liar as the witness, and the elevation of this ‘crime’ from a misdemeanor to a felony. But you’re correct if the DA believes a crime was committed the DA can certainly bring charges.

It is not whether the payment is legal. It’s about whether it’s been recorded legally per the business code. It’s similar to whether you’re allowed to write something off on your taxes.

Thanks.....I still didn't see it in either Caesars Palace or the Bellagio. 😉

I was just in Las Vegas. There was WAY WAY WAY more attention on March Madness. 😉 Maybe I was in the wrong sportsbook.

Morning BillStime! I’m so proud of you. You’re using actual adult words without childish memes or expletives. Ya see? You can do it if you try. Keep it up, and more people will engage with you. 👍

Liberalism: The intense fear that somewhere, somehow, someone you know in your heart is your equal is being treated more 'fairly' than you are.

Did I not say campaign funds? Or are we just being really selective in our reading skills today?

I’d correct this. The Leftist looks at all three glasses and somehow believes that they’re half full glass is less half full than everyone else’s half full glass.

Wrong. That is not the basis of the indictment. The case is essentially about bookkeeping. The issue is whether it’s illegal to use campaign funds for this sort of payment. It is NOT illegal for two people to willingly enter into a contract exchanging money for a ‘gag order’. (you gotta love the use of gag order 😉)

The goal is not to play rookies. The goal is to win football games. This statistical chart while interesting really is nothing more than a bunch of statistics.

It’s definitely complicated, because unlike in other sports, in football the various positions are completely different. There are both offense and defense, etc. So my point was if you desperately want/need a new starting MLB, not taking him at 27 because you think he slots closer to 39 is a bit silly. (My two cents.)

I’m always right…and the rest of you don’t have a clue. 😂😂

The reason you see teams move up a dozen picks is NOT because they think a player is super good. It’s because they believe that a team before them is going to select him. I have no problem with that…although I’m not always convinced that they actually know what other team is taking who.

I’ve never understood trying to slot a guy into exactly his draft value. We all just saw a thread showing how much if crap shoot these picks really are. Does this mean you take a fourth round guy in the first…no. But taking a guy a dozen or so players early doesn’t seem like much of a gamble or waste to me. You only get one pick every 32 players.

And down the rabbit hole we go. Geez….you asked whether I thought he had sex with Ms Daniels….and I said I don’t care. YOU obviously do. Have a nice day.

Thanks for the clarification. It’s not always clear on here what the heck folks are talking about….but…I believe it was YOU who wanted to place bets on whether Trump had a relationship with Ms Daniels. No?

That still isn’t what the case is about. Nice try.

Touché I’m done with my coffee and the suns coming up out here. Hope your back is feeling better!

It’s settled then. You don’t understand the attraction AT ALL. Thanks though.

Huh? That’s not what the Bragg case is about.

While memes are cute, I’d love to see if your chart would be all that different. I doubt that it would.

For starters, the people voting for Trump have absolutely zero interest in being invited to Mar-a-Lago.

I’ll at least give you credit for trying. But I’m not sure you have the specific gist of it.