transplantbillsfan

Never even heard of the guy... but damn does this have me intrigued.

I think it's actually quite likely we wait til round 2 or 3 for WR. DE/Edge Rusher might actually be a bigger need for us as the draft rolls around.

Aren't you a big BPA guy? Why would you consider drafting a guy at 22 who clearly wouldn't be BPA?

Might as well throw a flashback in here:

Just FTR... those complaining about Lamb's bench press, according to Dane Brugler at The Athletic the average bench press for the top 30 WRs in the NFL is 14.

What kind of moisturizer does he use to get those extra soft hands?? My wife says my hands are too rough.

Yes. I did. And I still stand by that. (*but read my note below with regard to statements like this*) No. Never said I liked Warren. She and Bernie were ALWAYS my 2 LEAST favorite candidates. You're clearly confused. Yes I did say that about Pete. And I still like him best. *You're the one who likes to speak in absolutes. I have a bet with you that Trump loses regardless of who the Democratic candidate is because that's what I believe will happen, even if Bernie wins the nomination. But if Bernie is the nominee I can freely admit I'm much less confident than I would have been otherwise. Like let's say my confidence will drop from like 80% to 60%... how about that? But yes, I believe Democrats will turn out in droves in November.* Except you are, because I was never CERTAIN it was any individual candidate that would win the nominee, though I felt Biden was most likely. You're spinning a narrative that I think in absolutes like you do and I don't. I've ALWAYS thought it very possible Trump could be reelected. I can be very honest that Bernie as a candidate makes me uneasy while also thinking he will win... but understand that last phrase for me in any context is never an absolute when it comes to the future. Soothsayer I don't proclaim to be, even though I have my own thoughts--sometimes strong thoughts--of outcomes. I've honestly forgotten the precise terms of our bet. Was it term length or one year? I'll abide by whichever we agreed to if I lose, as I know you will if you do... I just forget the exact terms. As to the 2nd statement, I guess you thought FDR was a communist and are anti-Social Security.

It is twisting. And again, run for office. You seem like you'd be good at it.

I'm disappointed in you. Rather than using this as an opportunity to somehow enlighten me on the parallels Bernie would have with Stalin or Mao, you instead post this crap. Maybe you should read up yourself. Marx shouldn't be lumped in with Mao or Stalin. Marxism was a vision. Stalin, Mao and others wildly distorted that vision and used its name for their own corrupt purposes of maintaining power. Obviously as all of you spew "he's a communist!" with regard to Bernie, you're referring to previous and current regimes that are nearly universally mislabeled as "Communist regimes" rather than actual Marxism. The thing is, while there might be an ideological alignment with true Marxism (which actually isn't evil the way some of you portray it), if you actually read up on what Sanders plans, there are many big differences. That's why he's not a communist. He's a Democratic Socialist. Love ya Foxxy... but you crack me up. Just read these 3 posts in sequence

Before the caucuses began there were something like 70,000 early votes. That was already fairly close to 2016 numbers. I wanna say 2008 was something like 117,000 total. I don't know when the final numbers will be posted, but it's pretty safe to assume the early votes combined with yesterday will pretty easily beat yesterday's turnout and will at least rival, if not beat 2008. You really do have no qualms whatsoever twisting narratives... You should run for office!

It's truly sad that your belief is that electing Bernie will lead us down the path of having dogs and machine guns patrolling the streets, food shortages (this is likely coming anyway, not because of Communism), basic hygiene needs (though already here in so many ways), not having private property anymore, Dictators (though we have a guy trying to get there in the White House right now), Censors (Though we have a guy trying his damndest to find ways to implement these right now), etc. Bernie as President does not make us East Germany, Poland, Czechoslovakia or Venezuela. He's a Democratic Socialist, NOT a communist... they simply aren't the same, ESPECIALLY when put into practice. If you're desperate for comparison then at least use more apt comparisons like Finland, Sweden or Denmark rather than East Germany, Poland and Czechoslovakia. And those better comparisons are consistently some of the happiest countries on the planet.

Saying it is so does not make it so. He's not, but this very argument to inevitability be used in the upcoming months--and already being used--is why Sanders remains my last choice as the nominee.

18-26 year old minimum. And truthfully, older than that, too. The 30 year olds saw Obama elected in a year all the prognostications had Romney winning... remember the sheer and utter shock and disappointment??? And youth voter turnout was lower in 2012 than 2004 by percentage... but Obama won. It wasn't a movement. 2008 was. That was when youth turnout was higher than it had been in 30+ years. New movement. Oust Trump

Boy do you live in a Bizarro world

Exactly. This whole demonization of Bernie is ridiculous. Don't want him. But he will help more than 45 did.

I want you to read what you just wrote. This sounds like you've been swept up in hard right propaganda.

Bernie isn't communism. As much as your insane right leaning media and tweets are about to tell you... Bernie does NOT equal Hitler

Welcome to the battle likely to ensue til November. Just remember... Trump has the backing of the massive monetary weight of the Republican Party behind him... along with Russia... who has obviously been backing Trump... (can't wait for the moron who retorts by saying they're also backing Bernie and can't obviously piece that together) That's why I fear Trump will be reelected and have for 3 plus years. The American people don't want Trump in office because he's a terrible President. But he might get reelected because of a 2nd election of ridiculous circumstances. It's funny. People like @Deranged Rhino keep pointing to things like fundraising while completely glossing over the fact that as you folks are touting Trump's fundraising you're also neglecting the fact that Hillary raised 400 million more than him in 2016. While I don't want Bernie as the nominee, I will vote for him. And Bernie very well would have won in 2016 if he were nominated, anyway. Now, the kids are 4 years older and you have more able to vote. Like it or not, the 18-22 year olds who became eligible to vote since Trump took office in 2016 and the 23-40 year olds (I'm not one of them) will not be complacent this time around assuming their candidate will win... they'll vote...

That's just your truth. It's not The Truth. I don't pretend to be enlightened. But I'm also not an idiot. I don't like that Bernie is winning right now... but... Bernie over Trump in 2020 any day of the week... even if Bernie isn't my 1st choice.

Regardless of the veracity of every word you say here, I'm pretty sure it's those voters under 40 (I'm 38) who will decide this election. And again. As far as Democratic nominees go, I will go out and stand in the rain for 2 hours to vote against Trump, even if it's my least favorite nominee in Bernie or Warren. Call me young and ignorant. Fine. Maybe you're just old, stubborn and out of touch

I disagree. I consider myself a fairly moderate Democrat. Bernie and Warren were in the back of the pack in terms of my Democratic nominee preference. But even if it's Bernie or Warren (and I think it's still waaAAaaayyy too early in the game to say it will be) I will go out to vote against Trump in November and will stand in line for hours to do it if I have to. And I'm not alone:

Freddy is the obvious and only choice. Position of need. At least a borderline Pro Bowler in his prime. Fantastic complement to the other player at his position. Team leader. Freddy. Period.

or maybe you've just been in this partisan sounding board for so long that you believe your side of the looking glass is the undeniable Truth.

Did I say "conspire?" No. No I did not. I said he asked for foreign interference in the election, which he very clearly did. Telling that you are inserting your own narrative into what I said, though. This is certainly bending the truth. But you've all created your own narrative here where that was a joke and no serious person viewed it as anything other than a joke. Yeah... sure... must be true because you guys believe it is.