BullBuchanan
-
Posts
6,054 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Gallery
Profiles
Forums
Events
Posts posted by BullBuchanan
-
-
On 5/31/2019 at 11:27 AM, Royale with Cheese said:
Ever hear of Da'Rick Rogers?
He was no Martin Nance.
-
1
-
-
On 7/26/2019 at 10:33 AM, BuffaloBill said:
I fail to understand why people still hold to the fallacy that Sammy Watkins was a”stud” receiver. His stats never upheld the hype.
I mean his first 2 years were better than Reed's first two years and he played half of his first season hurt. He's also averaged more YPG than reed over his career. Different era's yada, yada but Watkins is far from the bum many on this board would like to believe.
His career has been largely derailed by injuries, but the talent and production has always been there when healthy. I think he'll play a massive role for the chiefs this year. -
On 7/24/2019 at 3:26 PM, PromoTheRobot said:
Tommy Sweeney may well replace Patrick DiMarco in the fullback role.
Or Lee Smith.
6 hours ago, HOUSE said:TJ Yeldon isn't going anywhere. I think the fans will love him
If the season started today, Yeldon might be the best back on the team.
-
We still have a bottom 5 unit in the NFL. Maybe bottom 3.
If John Brown is better than your #2 WR, you have a weak group.-
2
-
1
-
-
We have zero LB depth ,and one of them are bound to get nicked up. I'd love to have foster, and he'd be cheap.
-
19 minutes ago, MacGyver said:
But in reality, especially for reporters, looks, voice, body language, play an important role. Also plays a role in almost every service industry. It's part of the marketing.
Male reporters, especially successful ones often look like river trolls.
9 minutes ago, MacGyver said:c'mon, I grew up in the 80's, look at kids today vs. even just then. There is a huge difference...
The only difference is you're older and have adopted a "kid's these days" perception. The world doesn't change as much as you think it does.
-
2 minutes ago, NewEra said:
People have preferences and that’s ok. In certain situations, taking action based on those preferences may be discriminatory. In my case, in this situation, I think I’m justified. As a media viewer, i’d prefer the Bills media journalist be an attractive woman as opposed to an unattractive woman. If she’s unattractive, I’ll still view the content just the same.
This world is just too sensitive if people have a problem with this line of thinking
Does this do it for ya?
-
1 minute ago, MacGyver said:
You've never looked at someone and thought, they'd look pretty hot of they lost 20 lbs? That seems impossible.
That wasn't the premise.
-
43 minutes ago, MacGyver said:
Men never stop wishing women would be cuter, this is not an age issue.
I've literally never thought that about anyone. No offense, but you kind of seem like a douche.
-
Unless one of McCoy or Gore implodes, I could see buffalo trainers hiding mats all around Devin Singletary's house with the hopes of saving him for next year. Unless it becomes clear he's going to become a league leader, I don't see him being a necessary piece this year. If the Bills are serious about keeping all of these guys, they've really put themselves in a bind somewhere on this roster.
Maybe DiMarco is finally done? -
On 7/17/2019 at 9:53 PM, BillsFan17 said:
I never once brought the government into it. My stance is you are inherently able say and or express your self, without anyone person or entity to infringe upon that. Idc if it's over the radio or on a social media platform. Deplatforming people creates very dangerous precedents. Simple as that. You can try whatever mental gymnastics you want to convince me otherwise.
It's not just gymnastics, but it's factually wrong. I am under no legal obligation to allow you to have your voice heard, and I can use any legal means at my disposal to prevent it if I want to. A non-government owned facility is in the same boat. If this forum, facebook, twitter or your local newspaper decided that they wanted to censor specifically you and your opinions, that is not at all illegal.
I'm a staunch defender of the first amendment and strongly believe in listening to dissenting opinions as long as they have merit, but in order to do that we need to be explicitly clear about what free speech is and what it is not. Various media outlets (and political figures) have blurred the lines as to what free speech is in recent years, but factually there's a very clear line between government entities (The FCC) and private individuals/companies (Facebook/Twitter, etc.) even when they are publicly traded.
Edit: you can consider it bad form, or unethical for a company to censor your opinions or gate the boundaries of discussion, but there's no legal merit to it in most cases as long as it doesn't discriminate against a protected class.-
1
-
1
-
-
59 minutes ago, BillsFan17 said:
Free speech is free speech, on any platform. Across any playing field you put it on.
No, it's really not.
You don't have the right to say whatever you want, and you certainly don't have the right to do it without consequences. You just have the right not to be imprissioned or sanctioned by the government for it.-
1
-
-
5 hours ago, Joe in Winslow said:
How many people is he entertaining?
When I was a smoker, an ounce would last a LONG time. Like a few weeks.
He's a professional athlete, I'm sure he has more than his fair share of hanger-ons. Also, if I was a pro athlete I'd buy in bulk too. I wouldn't exactly want to be popping down to a dealer on a weekly basis. -
5 ounces is really not that much at all. Personal consumption is completely realistic here, especially if he entertains. Thats's a completely legal amount in a lot of places that have legalized. $1000 street value/$500 from a dispensary.
-
1 hour ago, Jrb1979 said:
What does that have anything to do with what I posted? Do people not enjoy the summer?
I don't, but it hovers between 95-110 down here the whole time, so that's why. The other 9 months of the year are pretty great.
I'll always have a place in my heart for bitter cold snowy days, though. -
I see a lot of Jay Cutler so far, but it's early. Elway would be in that line but it's a bit early for that.
-
Am I the only one that kinda likes Mike Schopp? he does a pretty good job with quality content, but most of the callers to WGR are completely terrible. His interviews with bills players and coaches is usually solid, and he typically doesn't shy away from tough questions.
-
1
-
-
Hyde was a 92 in 2018, but he fell off pretty hard from that high last season. i think an 86 is fair. However, Poyer should easily be that high. Shady is done, Hughes is on the back side of his career and no one else is really worth mentioning except the ridiculousness of White. He should have started at 90.
-
1
-
-
This draft is bogus. Why draft a WR top 10 when McBeane can get a 5'7 guy after the draft?
-
14 hours ago, H2o said:
I got Brady. How many SB wins do the Pats have without him as the starter?
They've only had one crack at it to find out during BB's reign and he went 11-15. I think that's a pretty compelling case. If he was able to trade Brady and keep Jimmy G, I don't think he'd have missed a beat. -
You don't "have to" have the elite #1, but it makes you have to compensate in a ton of other areas. there's a lot of ways to build a great year-in-year-out team. You don't even need a #1 RB or a #1 QB. You either need to out-skill your opponents or you need to be able to out-scheme them and you need the requisite talent to make that happen. Having elite players at positions that help you score or prevent the other team from scoring makes that whole process a hell of a lot easier.
Winning the Super Bowl takes a bit of luck, but the better you are, the better position you put yourself in to get lucky. -
6 hours ago, SoCal Deek said:
That's the same thing they said at the advent of the forward pass, plastic helmets, facemasks, and artificial turf. If football lost its soul, it did so long before the Astrodome.
I mean, let's not kid ourselves. The quality of game itself has been on a massive decline since the eighties.
-
22 minutes ago, Jrb1979 said:
You keep saying that but then explain how it works in Cleveland. They have PSL's and just raised their ticket prices. I am pretty sure Cleveland as a city isn't any more well off then Buffalo is. I think it's just that a lot of are afraid of being priced out.
It DOESN'T work in Cleveland. In fact they got rid of PSLs 5 years ago. Also, the Browns stadiumw as built in 1999, they have cheaper tickets than we do, and their attendance is lower.-
1
-
-
5 minutes ago, Boatdrinks said:
Apparently you don’t know any , ergo they don’t exist in the humble hamlet that is WNY.
I sure don't know 70 thousand of them. The top paying fields in Buffalo are all high end medical jobs, and there aren't that many of them. How many luxury clothes stores stores exist in Buffalo where you pay $500 for a tshirt? How many Teslas, Range Rovers, Porsches, Bentley's, Ferarri's do you see on your commute?
If you see them chances are good they're athletes, high-end doctors, or construction company owners. You need that kind of money to afford the types of ticket prices they charge in new stadiums, and there simply isn't the volume for that in Buffalo NY. Maybe someday soon, but they need to start attracting more high end IT companies where making 100k is on the low end of comp.
Heck with Clowney. The situation I am watching is Jags
in The Stadium Wall Archives
Posted · Edited by BullBuchanan
Apparently Ngakoue balked at a $17.5M/year deal. That's a lot of cap % to pay for ~10 sacks a year.