Jump to content

oldmanfan

Community Member
  • Posts

    12,235
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by oldmanfan

  1. Then don’t be a fan. Or talk to a Cubs fan or a Red Sox fan from before 2000 for perspective
  2. Sherfield made a great catch in traffic That was his one bad play. This post is an example of confirmation bias. It would seem Brown will replace Edmunds as the whipping boy this year.
  3. Yep. And if you actually watch Brown and not just blindly yell about him, you’ll see he did a good job against Watt.
  4. Because they are my hometown team and I have watched them and rooted for them for 63 years. Not that you have that as a choice.
  5. And if anyone actually watched the preseason game Sunday with any degree of objectivity they would have seen Brown did OK.
  6. Maybe. We’re going to lose some guys that are NFL quality players. When you’re as good as the Bills are it’s going to happen.
  7. It can be both. Regardless he needs to play better
  8. Gouriage will be practice squad. He has potential but not ready for prime time yet.
  9. I see wondering about things is not allowed in your world apparently. Long Covid is a real thing. I presume we would have heard if he has it but it’s a condition with a range of symptoms. Do this. Go back, watch every offensive play in the first half, and focus just on Brown. I did. And he played OK. your nonsense about firing these guys is just that.
  10. Try again. Poyer knows the defense well but now you’re panicking over one play in a preseason game. Oliver suffers from the fact that too many people think he should be Aaron Donald when in reality he does his job well. Dawkins needs to get his head out of his ass and play better.
  11. Obsessive? No. Is it a real thing? Absolutely.
  12. I think Brown will be OK. I am more concerned with Dawkins if he has performances like last night. The Dutch kid will be the swing, and in a pinch they can move Edwards or Bates outside if required. People seem to think we can have stars at every position. But you can’t. I would have put more $$ into the O line because I think you win games up front. But we did so to get Morse, we did so to get McGovern, we drafted Torrence. The interior line looks a lot better. And we signed Dawkins to a long term contract because at the time he was playing very well. I might have gone T instead of say Cook in that draft, but I’d have to go back and look at who was available. And I was a Humphrey fan.
  13. Do me a favor. Go to the library. Find a dictionary. Look up the word wonder. They don’t necessarily keep him from playing. He is not actively infected. But the long term sequel as can go on for a while and affect things like the ability to condition as well as one would like.
  14. I keep posting this, but I watched every play with Brown in it last night, focusing on him, and he was OK. Did a good job overall against Watt.
  15. If they think the Dutch kid can handle it I wonder if they’d trade Dawkins.
  16. They did address them at guard. Interior line looked fine last night. And I’m sorry but I watched every down the offense played the first half, focusing on Brown specifically, and he was OK. Dawkins sucked last night.
  17. Brown held up pretty good yesterday. If you need a replacement tackle based on last night it would be to replace Dawkins
  18. 1. Dawkins needs to get his butt in gear but Brown was better than people say 2. Kincaid is the real deal
  19. Dawkins wasn’t good last night. But Brown except for the one play where he held was fine. He did a good job overall with Watt. And Oliver was disruptive from what I saw. People have preconceived opinions and refuse to watch things objectively. The one takeaway I’d have from last night is they may want to give the Dutch kid a serious look at LT if Dawkins is going to play like he did last night.
  20. The day after a loss, even in preseason, it’s hard to know. Let’s hope so.
  21. Again, I just watched every snap they played focusing on them. Brown was not bad except for the one play he held in. He did fine with Watt. Try watching objectively. Name one
×
×
  • Create New...