You realize you thinking a guy was better means nothing as well, right?
You realize these guys have a lot more data available to them and still it's considered a good draft if they hit on 50%, right?
I would ask you to list out, say, for the last five drafts guys you would have picked in what rounds, and then we could evaluate your expertise. The point is this: they did not draft a WR because: a. they addressed it in free agency and 2. they did not feel guys represented value over other selections made. You disagree, fine. But don't pretend you have more knowledge than they do over the process.