oldmanfan

Here's the thing. We have people here blasting the Bills for not doing this trade, yet a number of other teams in the league have backed out as well. So why is it only our team that's wrong? It just may be the Bills are smart here, and it's the player that has the problem. Or his agent. My guess is Rosenhaus has put into ABs head that by playing this game he'll get released and then can negotiate with anyone.

And to be fair this post argues against my stance thus far. Actual argument stated well.

I love to discuss things, but the major just wants to bash whatever the irganization does. Honest debate great! Mindless negativity just to be negative (or vice versa being honest), no.

That presupposes someone has a mind to actually read.

Three thousand more like. You don't think everyone here knows what you're trying to do here?

Yawn again. What criticism will you have when they win the Lombardi? Because we all know you'll have one.

Yawn. Same old stuff.

If they hadn't drafted Allen you'd be all over them. They draft their young QB and that's wrong too. Your act is tiresome.

No. They have a plan and they're moving forward with it. They got their young QB, now they're trying to put pieces around him.

Big armed QB that can deliver the ball downfield. You asked what the current regime had done for the offense, you are told, and then you change your argument. Again thanks for your service but your posts and opinions about the team are a joke. No matter what they do you spin it negatively. If Briwn had signed you'd be posting about how they don't really believe in their process. We know what you're doing. And it's pathetic at this point.

They put their young QB on the field. The one that showed a lot of promise. The one that was drafted higher than any QB in team history. But of course that's ignored. I applaud you service for our country. But as a Bills fan you're a joke.

He'll be in soon. And we all know what his take will be.

Mind boggling, isn't it?

He has a ways to go but the answer is yes. But he also didn't have much competition. Maybe Butler although he completely screwed up cap management.

How absurd. If it was process they would not have even kicked the tires on this. Stupid poster.

I would suspend him without pay.

This butt of jokes stuff is crap. Are fans around here really so insecure?

didn't he say in a recent interview he doesn't even need to play football? Fine. The Steelers should just tell him he has a contract, and if chooses not to honor it then they will suspend him for as long as he decides not to show up, and that any chance of him being traded is out the window. I would have liked to have a talent like him on the Bills, but clearly his ego is getting in the way at this point.

Keep looking dumb. Fine by me. To get back to the trade thing, we have a GM that took a look at the guy, they tried to work something out, apparently the player decided for whatever reason he doesn't want the trade. BFD. Move on. If I'm the Steelers I hold him to his contract, and let him miss the next three seasons if he doesn't want to play.

You obviously have no understanding of the concept or of math so not much more to be said.

So what if he didn't want to come? BFD. He could have come to a team with a young, upcoming QB that would have made him the focus of the offense, and he said no? That's his problem, not the Bills. I agree with a statement above that he's trying to force his release so he can renegotiate with a team of his choice.

None of the top players want to play for the Bills. Name the players they actively went after, the top players, that they made a serious effort to bring on that said no. The pity me, overreaction crap around here is crazy today.

Humans eat cows. Cows eat grass. Therefore humans eat grass. You're making the same false utilization of the transitive property.

Why do you care what some idiot host says? It is not a new low, they kicked the tires, they didn't like the deal, they didn't make the deal. You are looking for any reason you can to bash a team you supposedly root for. That is pathetic.

Sorry but you're completely wrong. You are claiming a false equivalence.