Terry Tate

Best post of the thread. Tell you what, though - if I'm in combat, and I know the enemy has been faking dead, or "surrendering", then attacking, there's a very high probability I'm shooting everything in sight and breaking any nearby freaking cameras. Unless I felt there was no chance they get the drop on me. I wouldn't feel good about it, but I'm being honest - I'd do it.

Wait a minute, that sounds familiar - where were you Sunday night between the hours of 8:30-11:30 pm est, and is there anyone who can verify it?

Why stop there? How about Todd Collins? Billy Joe? How about you? Yeah, YOU! What do you say everyone, who would you rather have starting at quarterback, Drew Bledsoe or BF_in_Indiana?

And look how poorly they've done since he left. More proof we need Dan for GM!

You want him at quarterback, or GM?

That was a nice touch, too.

Hey, you just keep getting bumped until someone gets around to pinning you.

Thanks for the complement. I think I summarized your principled position pretty well. You are no doubt aware there are lawyers that are pro-choice that feel the right to privacy decision was in error. Just thought I'd mention that for those who haven't come across that before, less they think that all pro-choice lawyers are of the same mind on that particular decision. The bottom line for me is a simple answer to your question is wrong, either way you answer it.

I don't think you'd have to get a direct hit, would you? If you taped it somewhere on the bike you could reach and just leave a trail of pepper spray behind you, he'd probably get the message. Or how about a super-freakin' loud air horn?

Don't marry her unless she can pass a 140-question Buffalo Bills test. And don't ever let her touch your records.

Strict = narrow = bad - got it. Broad interpretation = right to abort babies = good. Glad we have a lawyer to explain it to us.

What drives me nuts was not the praise for a good job when it was due (unfortunately, often enough), but when the Patriots had a play for no yardage or negative yards, and they continue to praise them. If the Bills manage to actually cover all the receivers on one play and Brady has to throw it away or get sacked, then he's a brilliant player that just made a smart decision to throw the ball away, and executed it perfectly. If you can't credit a defense for a negative or no gain, shut up already!

Win-win? Did you say WIN-WIN??? Sorry, I just can't wrap my brain around the thought of having to deal with more than one woman on a daily basis. If that's part of the deal, I'm not playing.

Perhaps "strictly interpret" was chosen because it has a different meaning than "narrowly interpret." You change strictly to narrowly, then defined it further as "to limit as much as possible". I don't find that definition anywhere. I don't read the same context into it as you do. With a premise built on that, perhaps it's difficult to find someone who will debate your question of why conservatives wish to take away our freedoms. Just a guess.

Thank you for taking the time to remember us. You're welcome - serving our country on active duty, then as a civilian supporting active duty troops has been one of the most rewarding things I have done in my life. I feel I owe the armed forces a debt of gratitude for all the ways I have benefited from serving - too many to mention. There will always be a place in my heart for those who make the commitment. I'm off to other things now. Thank you to all those who have served, continue to do so, and to their families.

I agree with your overall sentiment - don't forget air traffic control, fire and police emergency dispatch, etc. There are legitimate purposes for maintaining frequency control and separation. The morality police aspect would be another good example that both major parties are in favor of big government.

Just wait 'till you see how much you love him after he sleeps through the night for the first time! Hope mom is doing ok - congrats.

HOF selection process and list of selectors

John Gillespie Magee, Jr. wrote that. He broke the law during WWII by crossing into Canada - not to evade war, but to join the fight against Hitler. From the National Museum of the USAF

KD in CT's right. Psychotic, but absolutely right. We gotta take these bastards. Now we could do it with conventional weapons that could take years and cost millions of lives. No, I think we have to go all out. I think that this situation absolutely requires a really futile and stupid gesture be done on somebody's part.

Perfect. Just what this board needed, a sarcasm thread.

Shiny side out, guys. Shiny side out.

Yet another reason to appreciate Bobby April's coaching.

Moorman, McGee, McGahee, Adams, Clements, and DON'T FORGET BOBBY APRIL!

Tough to argue with any of that. One thing, though. If you're going to stay home until the whole thing blows over, you may want to stock up - it could be a while.