I remember King making an issue of whether the other team "game-planned" for the guy.
Thurman? Of course. From 90-93, if you stopped Thurman, you might win the game. If you didn't? Bad things. You simply had to set your defense to stop #34, it was that simple. Thurman gets a bad rap that he wasn't the flashiest (Sanders), nor the most prolific (Smith), nor had the most rings (Smith again), of his era. Then there's the (incorrect) story about the helmet. That said, he should get his ticket to Canton punched this year.
Andre? Maybe not so much. Then again, if you did try to shut down #83, #80, #82, #84 (or #88) and #34 were going to get you. It's different for WRs. I'm a little on the fence for Andre. He was the best receiver on one of the best offenses in history. His play made people start talking about RAC (run after catch) yards. Jerry Rice was once asked, "How does it feel to be the best receiver in football?" and he answered "You should ask Andre Reed." Though a ludicrous statement, still a validation that his peers felt he was an elite player. Okay, I've talked myself into it.