BuffaloHokie13

He's earned a shot with the 2's next week at a minimum imo

No, he didn't do that at all... The interviewer was the one who brought them up in the first place. His response was that they should be applauded for that.

Last year Reggie Bush would've earned $31,500 for receiving, and paid back $1,050 for his rushing

Good to know. We have a couple folks over here that do similar things and I enjoy reading all of them

Meh, I'm just going to agree to disagree. I take absolutely no issue with what he said. And by 'throwing a national brand under the bus' he likely gave the conversation more fuel to keep burning than if he hadn't.

Not really. He wanted to use an example and chose the best football school in the country. If he would have used VT I wouldn't feel any differently, but he didn't because we aren't the football presence that Alabama is.

That's EST by the way. I'll edit the original too

I don't know what you're actually trying to prove, but what you are proving is that you are taking the fact that he used Alabama as an example wayyy too personally. He's against the entire system, not Alabama's academic standards specifically.

Weightless

Impossible. He was incredibly decisive. 2 steps and the ball was out. Maury saw it with his own eyes!

Re-air on NFLN is 4AM EST on Fri August 11th, based on their schedule.

Too bad we got rid of Arthur 'the career ender' Moats

With any luck, and maybe a bit of karma, Tom hits the wall on December 3rd

On that, we most certainly agree. I also felt he was the most ready to play of the bunch out of the gate (though I'd prefer not to if the situation allowed it). I think there were some plays that give you hope last night, and some plays he wishes he had back, but it's preseason and his first live action. Time will tell.

2015 O: 9th 2015 D: 24th 2016 O: 10th 2016 D: 27th 2014 O: 26th 2014 D: 2nd

They need to be more consistent imo. BTW, for context with the 24 point thing, the best win % for any team when opponents score 24+ is 55.56% (Patriots) and they've only allowed 24+ 9 times in the last 2 years. Only 5 teams have a win % at 50% or better (Pats, Raiders, Chiefs, Panthers, Falcons). And only 2 of those teams have allowed 24+ more than 10 times over the 2 years combined (Raiders & Falcons).

It's an even lower bar, but the Bills are 0-14 when opponents score 24+ over the past 2 years. The Bills are 15-3 when opponents score less than 24. If you get specific to Tyrod then we're 0-11, as opponents scored 24+ in all 3 of Manuel's starts (though Jax was gifted 20 by Manuel himself).

The whole game matters. All 60 minutes. The D allowed 31 points and 38 points. Sorry you can't deal with that.

If you go by DVOA: 19) Dolphins 20) Packers 22) Raiders 26) Falcons 27) Bills

https://forums.twobillsdrive.com/topic/195140-starting-quality-cb-available-take-a-look/

The one where I explained why our QB struggles with Man coverage and you took it as an excuse rather than reading the statement for what it was.

Truly funny based on what just transpired earlier in the thread.

Among the league's best certainly has a better ring to it

Did I say it was the receivers' fault/problem?

It's been a while and I could use a refresher. What was your stance on DVOA?