TPS

Another creative wrinkle by Daboll with the 6-5 group. Like it.

I think that was Kaelin not Charles.

Great...thanks to your post yesterday, I’m well aware of where you will be in 10 minutes...

I’m guessing consistency will win out in this competition. If Allen is up and down over the preseason and ajm is more consistent though unspectacular, then he’ll be the starter. At least the preseason games will be interesting this year!

He was a guy I hoped they would draft, but They have a lot of TE bodies in camp already.

Ok, last counter point then. While his experience is "minimal," he has watched and learned, and he's started a playoff game in which he brought them back to the cusp of a victory but for the stupid flagrant foul on the D. Again, the argument here is you only start Allen if the competition is not close.

1. An away game against a good defensive front to start. 2. They play some very good teams in the first 8, so if he/they start poorly the haters will start the bust talk. 3. A couple of bad games against those first good teams won’t be good for his psyche. 4. He hasn’t seen anything close to nfl defenses, so better to watch and learn. My preference is they take the mahomes approach, let him start at the end of the season if they are out of contention. These are in no no particular order. Again, unless it’s no contest, which I doubt will happen.

Unless it’s not even close, I’d rather see AJ (or peterman) initially take the reins to start the year.

Correct. If Q3 is similar, then 2018 should make the 3-4% range I predicted for the year.

I'll get this in before B-Man, Q2 GDP estimate in at 4.1%. https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2018-07-27/u-s-gdp-growth-hits-4-1-fastest-since-2014-in-win-for-trump

That is a very ignorant statement overall.

Just showing my affection for you Tom.

?

You like to focus on the mundane. Of course, since you view Russia and Putin as evil incarnate, I am sure that you disagree with his main thesis... If the Russia-gate hysterics prevent Trump from normalizing relations with Russia, then Putin has no choice but to ally with China, which would also raise the risk of a major conflict.

I understood Escobar's main point as the elites mistakenly want to isolate Russia as a foe, which of course helps the funding stream; however, by doing so it pushes Russia into an alliance with China, which is the real threat to the future superiority of the US. But let's argue about a minor statement related to the technology gap 50 years ago....

@Deranged Rhino you should enjoy this piece by Escobar: http://www.atimes.com/article/heres-the-real-reason-the-us-must-talk-to-russia/

Sorry for your loss Royale. I was a wreck after putting mine down last fall after 14 years. He was the one constant through a lot of changes in mylife over that time. I still miss him...

As I told you before, the DNC and HRC are not "liberals." Bernie and Ocasio represent the liberal left, which is my territory....

As I started with, had this been a white male, then the DNC would've ignored it. What does "socialism for all" mean?

I'm an independent.

As I started out with, we choose to spend trillions on endless war and dysfunctional advanced weaponry. We also currently spend more on healthcare than any other advanced country. It’s more a policy choice than a financial choice.

Would you describe current supply as free market? to your point, like any market, you can’t create a ****-load of demand without consequences. I’m sure a system could be designed to phase it in over time. One example being pushed is to expand Medicare, lowering the eligible age e.g.

The point I was responding to is that socialism impoverishes countries. Are they poor? Are the many countries with universal healthcare and higher tax rates than the US poor?

I wonder how the Onion comes up with this crazy shite? https://politics.theonion.com/mueller-reveals-russia-investigation-just-elaborate-sti-1827696431

I don't want them providing health care either, but I do want them to provide insurance.