Big Blitz

What?? Ukraine is “essentially” NATO?? Um. No. Israel is our ally. Iran is a legit global threat especially to the West. Lost. You people are lost.

But we should help Ukraine. You people are lost. And I’m not saying to get involved. It’s just absolutely insane you claim to be supporting “democracy” in Ukraine - but the only democracy in the Middle East - yea screw them. It isn’t hypocrisy. You’re just lunatics.

Omg

Good thread! We agree.

I forgot this thread - I’ll take mine down. I thought there was and I couldn’t find This must have been bumped down 100 threads due to the Billfluencer bump fests. Unlike Bill we don’t need 50 threads discussing the same thing lol. And our own troops.

Always been a CCP stooge - fyi - this is why you actually have to campaign. And do interviews. For the public to learn about you. That’s why Ds hid Harris for 3 months after ousting Biden and anointing her. Remember that as you see these Astroturfed “no kings” riots.

His post is basically “here are the things the commies and evil people of the world do and think.” LAMP

OMG. Yea all you’re here to do is troll. I literally just posted this: Iran Is Cheating on the Nuclear Deal Germany’s domestic intelligence agency said in its annual report that Iran has a “clandestine” effort to seek illicit nuclear technology and equipment from German companies “at what is, even by international standards, a quantitatively high level.” The findings by the Federal Office for the Protection of the Constitution, Germany’s equivalent of the FBI, were issued in a 317-page report last week. German Chancellor Angela Merkel underscored the findings in a statement to parliament, saying Iran violated the United Nations Security Council’s anti-missile development regulations. “Iran continued unabated to develop its rocket program in conflict with the relevant provisions of the UN Security Council,” Merkel told the Bundestag....The German report also stated “it is safe to expect that Iran will continue its intensive procurement activities in Germany using clandestine methods to achieve its objectives.” https://www.cfr.org/blog/iran-cheating-nuclear-deal The auto pen ink was barely dry. Those would be the missiles you’re seeing today.

Then why didn’t President Auto Pen do another sham deal?

You really need to self ban

Maybe it wasn’t the best plan to trust such significant geopolitical problems with a street agitator from Chicago that spoke well (while saying nothing) and accomplished absolutely zero in his personal or political life that should tell us - yea this guy is a great idea!

From Germany in 2016: …Germany’s domestic intelligence agency said in its annual report that Iran has a “clandestine” effort to seek illicit nuclear technology and equipment from German companies “at what is, even by international standards, a quantitatively high level.” The findings by the Federal Office for the Protection of the Constitution, Germany’s equivalent of the FBI, were issued in a 317-page report last week. German Chancellor Angela Merkel underscored the findings in a statement to parliament, saying Iran violated the United Nations Security Council’s anti-missile development regulations. “Iran continued unabated to develop its rocket program in conflict with the relevant provisions of the UN Security Council,” Merkel told the Bundestag....The German report also stated “it is safe to expect that Iran will continue its intensive procurement activities in Germany using clandestine methods to achieve its objectives.” https://www.cfr.org/blog/iran-cheating-nuclear-deal

Feel the same way about Ukraine - where there are ZERO deals unless you use it to launder money. And no, it wasn’t an arms control deal. It’s about nuclear weapons. There shouldn’t be a sunset clause. Our government changes and they know that. Theirs does not. If it was such a great deal - sign a treaty. Iran never had any intention of following the agreement. They never did. There would be zero repercussions if they didn’t outside of sanctions by the U.S. - which we’d be doing anyway bc of their constant attacks on Israel. That’s not the main issue. Just one problem of many. It was such a great deal. They were never not enriching uranium. “More than ever.” Do you hear yourself. NO ENRICHMENT. THATS THE DEAL. Allowing 3 percent is all they need to get to a bomb. That’s what they were doing.

God, you’re an idiot and a hack Finally, critics noted (PDF) that even if Iran abided by the agreement (which itself was in doubt), the original JCPOA wasn't a permanent limitation of the Iranian nuclear program, but a pause. The agreement included a sunset clause that meant that key parts of the agreement constraining Iran's enrichment capacity were set to expire in 10 to 15 years. Though the JCPOA required Iran to adhere (PDF) to the Additional Protocol of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty and not pursue a nuclear weapon, Iran had also made and withdrawn (PDF)that commitment before. Critics argued that once the JCPOA expired, Iran would be able to drop the Additional Protocol and sprint to develop a nuclear weapon. Consequently, the agreement was not a lasting solution but simply kicked the can down the road. https://www.rand.org/pubs/commentary/2025/05/the-revenge-of-the-jcpoa.html#:~:text=After first trying a series of cyberattacks,Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) in 2015.&text=Critics of the JCPOA noted that Iran,of proxies or other malign activities abroad. More: At the time, most opponents of the JCPOA focused largely on three substantive critiques of the agreement. First, the agreement wasn't “comprehensive.” Although it curbed Iranian uranium enrichment, it did not curb Iran's missile program, the likely delivery mechanism for an Iranian nuclear bomb. Nor did the agreement do anything to roll back Iran's vast network of proxy military forces throughout the Middle East that were threatening U.S. forces and allies in the region. Second, the agreement offered Iran sanctions relief in exchange for its restrictions on Iran's nuclear program. At the time, Iran had tens of billions of dollars sitting in foreign accounts. The JCPOA allowed Iran to tap these funds. Critics of the JCPOA noted that Iran could use this economic relief to nefarious ends, like upping its funding of proxies or other malign activities abroad. At the very least, the release of these funds would help the Iranian regime survive in the face of widespread domestic discontent.

They’re trash. Every single Democrat not named Fetterman. Trash.

Hey Bill…lander……congrats!!! You did it!

Incredible

That’s better suited for a Sabres thread. Would get to 100 pages in a day.

Looks like we should be cutting rates. I know we did that……..SEVEN times right after 9/11. Im sure it’s not political in any way tho.

If this is all accurate - absolutely methodical precision

Summarized - 25 years of Neo con Uni party foreign policy led to Iran today. That one act did more to set back non-proliferation than potentially any single event in modern history, and yet we are told by the same neocons who designed, demanded, and executed it to trust them when it comes to Iran policy. Iraq showed that American intelligence was not to be believed, Libya showed that America and NATO were not to be trusted, and Afghanistan showed that America was not to be feared. These are the fruits of neocon American foreign policy over the last quarter-century. If you want the next twenty-five years to look any different, you’d be well advised to do the opposite of whatever the neocons demand. And right now, they’re demanding war with Iran.