GunnerBill

You are not right. You are wrong. Is there a chance they end with 3 instead of 7? Sure. There is a chance. But it is no more than a chance. Even that required the Bills D to make a play. They didn't make a play. That was the problem NOT the time outs.

Yep that was ludicrous.

For the first time Rashawn Slater injury looms large.

Okay. I was only watching on redzone. I agree it was definitely close enough to review.

They did look didn't they? There was a booth review? See I don't think I can look at that and conclusively say that toe hasn't already started to come up. It looks I have to say on that photo like it has. Two frames before it is still down but I am not sure he has established possession at that point. If the toe is still grounded there it is catch. But man I haven't seen anything conclusive. I'd leave it on the field.

I actually think the toe comes up just before he secures possession. It isn't secured at the start of that frame for me. I think they were right not to overturn ruling on the field. I'd have left it as a catch if that is how it was ruled. But I don't think that is conclusive enough enough because of the establishing possession element to overturn when it is called incomplete.

The Jets are 0-3. Glenn is clapping.

I had the Packers

People moaning about the Bills weaknesses should really be made to watch this opening window. Even among the supposed good teams there was been some dreadful football.

They call the drive differently though. They were playing for dual purpose. They were not leaving time for Josh UNLESS the Bills D made a play

If they'd done that there would have been not time to conserve. You'd have walked off the field with timeouts still in your pocket.

I STILL say as great as Chase is they should have drafted Sewell.

That is exactly right. Generally the massive passing yards and touchdowns signal some issues that show up in the post season. Equally though unable to stretch the field vertically tends to too.

Fumble! Steelers ball!

Not quite willing to go there yet but they do look impressive. Warren has been transformative. Bengals defense is even worse than last year.

He still sucks. FYI

Who knew David Sills was still in the league? Patriots tie it up.

Aaron Glenn is doomed. It's that look on his face. He knows. I said last week to @Gugny I'd be stunned if he was 1 and done. But watching hin coach maybe not.

Pacheco? He sucks.

If people want to criticise the defense on that drive no argument.

Key words highlighted. It was the D not making a play not the use of time outs that was the issue.

Except that is exactly what they were doing. They didn't start using their time outs until right at the end. They wanted to acheive Josh not touching it again. The only way to avoid that was for your defense to make a stop.

I think DJ can play more outside than Shakir. I think of him as an outside guy who can play inside. I'd be open to it price depending.

But must be balanced against four 3 and outs. The D was feast or famine on Thursday.

They are doing things different. As the poster you are replying to pointed out - much more man coverage, more 4-3 as their base and more blitzing. Now it is absolutely fair to say at the moment that it doesn't look like those changes are helping a ton (thought they did keep Miami to 4.6 yards per play and under 300 total yards) it is also fair to have questions about the coordination of the defense and the playcalling. But it is not true to say scheme wise they are doing nothing different. They definitely are.