Orlando Buffalo

https://www.yahoo.com/sports/punter-marquette-king-out-of-nfl-since-2018-wonders-why-he-has-been-shunned-by-league-154407519.html They discuss his issues while a Raider but don't say the obvious, on a good team he is the least important player therefore don't make any noise. This dude thinks a punter is not the easiest dude on a good team to replace.

I want it on the road either in KC or NE. I think a nice win on the road will set us up nicely for the year. I hope we get Jax in week three because I still think week 1 they might surprise someone because there is not game tape.

I just looked at spotrac and his salary is 6 million this year and I feel we can do more with 6 million elsewhere. I would rather see what Knox and Hollister can do than send 6 million right now him.

I think unless we are trading for a RB in the first round we have our three RB for the year already on team. I have no idea what they think of Najee or Etienne but Beane does not drop someone unless the better player is already on roster and right now he is top 3. He is a rookie contract guy who has gained 1500 yards in two years, definitely a good value for now.

Actually I like arguing as long as the other party is being honest- it went a different direction but still on a set of rails, just not the ones I expected initially. I agree MLB thinks it will bring them some young fans but I bet it loses them more, at least initially, and I doubt people who are impressed by it stick around for long.

This thread has gone completely a different direction then I had hoped, and I wanted to discuss it much more along the MLB angle. I have read that the ratings of the national games are down but that is a small sample size, can anyone speak to ratings otherwise? Basically will MLB pick up some new fans by doing this or just tick off the conservative fans and lose out due to it?

I don't care who the rules are passed by or who it effects politically, I care that the vote is made secure and people have equal access across the state, if this was being passed in June of 2024 I would say it is wrong but the rules are now open and plain. My neighbor last year recieved a ballot for his mother from Pennsylvania who died around 2012 therefore making someone verify they want it by mail is important, I don't trust drop boxes that are not monitored, and as for long lines I understand that they are a function of democrat areas because most people don't have three hours to spend in line but those without jobs certainly do, especially if you are feeding them the whole time. Lastly in order to enroll your kids in an Orange County school you must have a valid ID, and there are no exceptions, if they can get an ID for that then the voting ID should not be a problem.

You literally complained that the long lines are only in democrat areas as well as other problems and then you blame the state for making a way to change that. In FL if we have major voting issues we know it is gonna be the three idiot counties in southeast FL, the only heavily democratic counties. The law is written similar to FL which will not allow them to remove someone mid election but will hopefully allow them to keep from having someone like Brenda Snipes. https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.sun-sentinel.com/local/broward/fl-ne-brenda-snipes-ends-court-case-20190124-story.html%3foutputType=amp I am happy though you got through a whole post without mentioning Trump.

You really are a racist if you think black people are too dumb or incompetent to get an ID. As I stated MULTIPLE times to you the 2020 election has been decided but you still continue lying about me. There is nothing in the bill that allows someone to throw out a legally cast ballot, that is a lie. Lastly why did they wait till after the election? Do you realize how many emergency provisions were added in during 2020 to help with the vote? There was gonna be changes. I though do hope you boycott us in FL because we require similar things to vote, though our minorities are capable of figuring it out

I agree- the absurd part was the officials got blamed for the "fail mary" which was two guys fighting for a ball. In real time it is hard to tell what happened. It is 1/10th as bad as the interception by Josh in the Rams game, which was clear on replay.

I am going to assume you have the homework and confirmed Watson has admitted this- he is dead in the water for public opinion and his best hope is that there is no evidence of actual forcing anything on any of the girls. He sounds like a Charlie Sheen kind of guy, which once again best case is he stayed on the proper side of the law, but his image is destroyed and I am glad he is not our problem.

If you were not a long time poster I would assume you were simply a troll. Elections security is ONLY because of Trump? There is NO evidence of election fraud? As for your lie, you lied about me, you stated I supported Trump's claim about the election when I stated the opposite, and your entire premise is based on Trump. An intelligent person will look at this election with all of its problems and try to fix them, even though it does not change what happened in November. But you have been clear that any election security is bigoted and no evidence is needed, along with that Trump is still living in your head because every attack was centered around him.

This is what this has turned into- somehow Trump is responsible. No one has shown one way the bill is racist and those that attack it have had to say that election security is not important. In fact most people attacking it have stated that unless you can prove major voting anomalies in the 2020 election any further security is improper.

We are a top offense already and the only thing that makes us one of the all time greats is a great RB. TE would be nice to upgrade but we throw well already, need to be able to run.

Nice one, you lie about me, then act like I am the problem because you can't read.

Your reading comprehension is quite poor, I wrote I " have stated multiple times that this election was not decided by cheating". I am gonna stop arguing with you because you are not arguing with me but some figment of your imagination.

Senate races are often 10k votes, so it is definitely possible if someone who is supposed to stop it just is busy saying it did not happen. The best part of your comments is that you can not argue without mentioning Trump- I don't love Trump and have stated multiple times that this election was not decided by cheating. Unlike you I am able to think critically and when a government official tells me it is the most secure election ever when Pennsylvania is changing their rules of operation on the fly, Nevada is sending out ballots to people who died 10 years ago, and Michigan can't count properly I won't trust them. It scares me how adamant you are that this govt is being honest but the last one was the most dishonest ever when 80% of the federal employees are the same.

It does not need to be millions but often 100k that makes the difference and that can be done through many ways. When literally 100 billion is being swayed by a few people to speak as if the motivation is i not there is being intentionally oblivious

Confusion over how to sign your name? 10% were confused by signing their name? It is either fraud or extreme incompetence but your defense of it shows you willing to believe anything to not have to admit that our elections should be more secure

Signature mismatch is not a sign of fraud? What is the point of the match if not to find fraud? You believe 10% of the population can't sign their own name in NY? Seriously what is the point of signature match except to catch fraud?

If not fraud then why did they throw out so many votes? As for it being a primary, it is in an area where the primary decides the congress person. Those votes very likely could have changed a member of congress. As for believing anything Trump says, I don't believe this election would have been changed because of cheating but this election had many issues, and to believe this was the first election in US history without cheating makes one of us naive. It does seem as if your definition of fraud is different than mine, it would appear unless I can prove intent you do not believe in fraud.

Your first point is valid, I did not realize how lax there law is about what ID means and I ask the question of how often they go through the rolls because it would seem that I could just move to another part of the state and get a second ballot, maybe someone with more details could comment. As for the second part of "substantial" in NY they threw out 8k votes during the primary that had only 80k total votes. This should be unacceptable in any situation but it indicates either vague laws, that people do not know what to do, or corruption at that scale. Good clear laws make it easier for all sides to deal with.

In new york they tossed 10% of the votes in one of the primaries. That is either evidence of fraud or incompetence because you can't toss ballots unless you think they are fraud. I swear you Biden people will believe those ballots were tossed just to help the republican.

What is the joke? Maybe it was lost in the medium

To register to vote in colorado you need an ID before they will mail you a ballot. The only large "good" difference between GA is that CO mails out ballots to everyone who is registered, where as in GA you must request it and in CO you can register on election day, but you need an ID anyways. We can debate these two points but neither is racist. Her best line is "no widespread fraud" which is true but shouldn't our goal be to eliminate as much fraud as possible? These laws help with security.