Orlando Buffalo

I feel bad for the dead guy if his intentions were not violent but you do things that stupid you have bad things happen

You also mentioned previously that at some point there must be a diminishing return, which is certainly true, the first hour is more effective than hour 60, but as long as that last hour moves us closer to never having 13 seconds again I will be happy with it

I would recommend not arguing with him, he starts with a point and then fits all info around said point. All studies that show the 50 hour work week stuff are true because 95% of people don't have a passion for their job like all NFL coaches do. If you are committed to your job you can do the Elon Musk 100 hour work week and be effective. I will also point out that I used to have a 60 hour work week and did well at it for 6 years and got paid well, but I was not the father I wanted to be.

Can you show why you think Fox news viewers are less informed? I assume it is this study https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.businessinsider.com/study-watching-fox-news-makes-you-less-informed-than-watching-no-news-at-all-2012-5%3famp The only issue with this study is it was questions about what was covered on NPR the prior month. Fox news covers different material and in my opinion more important information. https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.washingtontimes.com/news/2021/may/19/survey-fox-viewers-better-informed-cnn-msnbc-viewe/ All should look at all the news sources and see what everyone is covering from their own slant, but your gullibility that 8 questions where all groups are less than 50% accurate is very telling.

I heard the interview and he seems like a dude who is gonna love Buffalo and help us get better

Sad part is it is still more topical than your comment.

No he would have a disinformation board to censor those he disagrees with, probably headed by someone who believes that freedoms can be curtailed because the government says so and calls a laptop fake only if it it is true

It is the same thing as people moving out of Illinois- they are simply smarter than you.

Can you show me the Biden being taken out of context in a similar manner?

We do agree that summer 2020 was much worse, in many more places, to many more people, where police fought for a lot more several hours. Once again we likely have come to an impasse because you are either ignorant or can't see the forest for the trees

Seriously compare the damage done on January 6th to the riots of 2020- unless you had a huge amount of suicides from what happened across the country then this is nonsense. And please only speak for your side when you state "we" ask too much. I defend cops 95% of the time against liberals. January 6th lasted less than 3 hours, nothing was burned down, few people attacked the cops, and if that is what sent that guy over the edge I feel bad but there was a lot more going on with him than that day.

You think police officers committed suicide because of that event? I am not sure how to react to that except assume you don't have any friends who are cops. Cops don't kill themselves over crap like that, if they did the summer of 2020 would have had a ton of suicide.

I ask seriously, why is it that you are not pushing for the laws that are on the book currently to be enforced properly? The kid in Uvalde lived at an address where he should not have been allowed to buy them by law, why are you not livid with the federal government for screwing that up?

Besides the death of Ashli Babbitt who died? I know it messes with your world view but she is the only one.

Interesting take- especially based on the It is funny that what you focus on is not the 85% of Dems who thought it was an insurrection. The CHAZ in Seattle was an actual insurrection and Jan 6th was a riot. No shows up to an insurrection against armed men without real weapons, and they left their weapons in another state because they did not want to be arrested on gun laws. Dems don't have the slightest clue the definition of so many words, except how the words make them feel, like Ultra MAGA

Florida already has a law on the books that limits state money to pro franchises ever since the fraud committed by the Miami Marlins. The line item was written in a way to pretend it was not for the Rays, when it clearly was. We had a similar situation in Orlando with the soccer stadium where they had financing, law passed before it was finalized, and then they did not have state funding. State can do other things but nothing like the $800 million NY is paying

There is no discussion of why the police presence was not provided. The committee has stated they will not interview Pelosi or Bowser both of whom denied requests for more police. This was announced long ago and Nancy stated she was not even asked a single question about why. https://www.google.com/amp/s/thehill.com/homenews/house/592694-pelosi-says-she-has-not-provided-any-information-to-jan-6-panel/amp/

Continued statements that the whole thing would not have been avoided by simply having a full police presence is asinine. the committee is not looking to determine why, when it was known that there were agitators there saying days before the event that they planned to go into the building, they had less security than on a normal day. You are correct that there is no point to this conversation because you are either ignorant of the fact that security had less people than normal on capitol Hill that day or you truly think getting Trump makes the whole thing worthwhile

I believe you truly believe what you preach but I also think your odd obsession with the gun and not the reason for the murderer is inappropriate. My goal is to eliminate the murders, not the way they happen. The link below shows Norway and Switzerland have the lowest murder rates in Europe while having much more lax gun law that most European countries, and the ones with the most murders several have rather strict gun laws.

I will support on idea of Jonathan, at this point the damage done is out of his control and the ability to fix it is beyond this president. But yeah the framing is a lot different.

I am literally asking what could possibly be found by this hearing, that is not simply opposition research, that the FBI would not find easier and better? We know crimes were committed, so arrest them. If you think there was a conspiracy let the FBI handle it, because we all know politicians lie.

How many of these would not have happened if we changed gun laws? Nigeria apparently had a massacre today at a church in a country with almost no legal gun ownership.https://www.yahoo.com/news/official-dozens-feared-dead-nigeria-135922075.html

I truly believe you are being honest but when you have to defend each simple concept with three long paragraphs, maybe consider it is just political hackery. As I keep asking what do you think you might find out? Or do you actually think the FBI is keeping secrets to benefit Trump? We know what happens on January 6th, and I fully support arresting those who were violent or broke into the capitol but you keep acting like they are doing an investigation when it is only opposition research funded by the US taxpayer.

Then I ask again- what do you expect them to find with this hearing? Anything criminal the FBI can find much easier, and is better equipped. There is truly nothing of importance or validity that they COULD find that has not been found by the FBI.

The best part is you are actually arguing that the FBI couldn't find a shred of evidence to prove this but you think a bunch of politicians will. Ignorance must be bliss, but to watch the summer of 2020 burn down cities without repercussions, ignore laws for how ballots are distributed and collected, and you have this charade after impeaching because Trump riled them up, it must be hard to just see the problems Trump caused. And before you go full stupid, I accept the 2020 election is what it is based on Covid but still would like to improve the future elections so these questions are not asked again