Orlando Buffalo

"I’m not talking about the neo-Nazis and the white nationalists, because they should be condemned totally – but you had many people in that group other than neo-Nazis and white nationalists," You believe Mexicans can't be rapists and no other countries are crapholes? Your inability to read more than the media tells you is amazing. You asked for a leader to denounce them, he did and you said he was bad for denouncing them

Perhaps we should have a leader that says "We condemn in the strongest possible terms this egregious display of hatred, bigotry and violence, on many sides. On many sides." Or "KKK, neo-Nazis, white supremacists, and other hate groups that are repugnant to everything we hold dear as Americans.”

I did enjoy the amount I watched and likely will go see a game next year here in Orlando. The question will be how much continuity will there be amongst the players. Obviously the best players will go the NFL, at least as PS guys, and will the replacements be able to get on the same page?

ILB I agree with, the OL depends on if Spencer Brown is actually better than he showed as the Bills believe. The other two are stupid, I feel WR is still more questionable than RB, and DE is more questionable than DT until Miller comes back.

This is not to attack but ask how is it possible that they were arrested last June but still so little known? Someone has to pay for these guys to live and if they are not Feds then how do they have money for all the crap they do? https://www.npr.org/2022/06/11/1104405804/patriot-front-white-supremacist-arrested-near-idaho-pride

When did I say Dems want violence? I said they accept violence to blacks, to prove me wrong show me the Dem stronghold where the acceptable level of violence to blacks is lower than to whites. As for my bubble, I am a teacher and I deal with children every day who believe as Dems do, and usually when they speak on political matters it is very naive, not evil.

Goose has one point that is true: Dems allow crime to happen because it happens primarily to to black people, if it was happening to whites you know they would shut it down fast. His statement though that the concept that Chicago has become a violent place due to the courting of southern voters is one he needs to flesh out a little.

"If I can't force a doctor to chop of a mentally ill child's penis my rights are under attack" is a surprising statement even from you.

I was convinced it was Feds also but I just looked it up and Wikipedia estimates there are 200 members of the Patriot Front, who probably call the media to cover them. There are less Patriot Front members, who have done less damage, then there are gang members in one neighborhood in Chicago.

He did not intentionally kill him, he restrained a man who was threatening those around him and he happened to die. He was a threat to people around him which is the big difference between him and Floyd, Floyd did not threaten anyone.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/theweek.com/public-health/1023502/north-carolina-state-concludes-tragic-school-year-that-saw-14-student-deaths%3famp This article states 4 students died of natural causes at NCST this year. People under 25 don't die of natural causes in bunches, what the hell is killing them?

https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.miamiherald.com/news/state/florida/article275351401.html I don't even understand the point of the title, since it is factually inaccurate and it is not anymore exciting then the real thing. It is almost like they simply want to have the most vaguely related title possible just as a standard.

This case is not interesting because we have many reports of Neely threatening to hurt other people. He was acting erratically and there were no police to handle it. Two other men helped him contain Neely which shows he was true threat. Lastly your blaming conservatives for the lack of support for someone in NYC? There is no law stopping NY from helping him, just indifference

Wrong words, I meant reductio ad absurdum, that is embarrassing. Anyways the reason we make laws is that they make our lives better. The reason I am against most new gun laws is two fold- the current ones are poorly enforced and since 99.9% of people don't worry me I would prefer the government focus on dealing with those people that can cause issues. Forcing good people to work harder to benefit government is not a good idea to me.

You have to come back with something that stupid to make it seem like you are reasonable? Does the whole video seem indiscriminate to you?

@redtail hawk and @Andy1 why do you think someone has the right to threaten people in a public place with physical harm? And if you don't believe that what should the Marine have done in that situation?

Ad hominem attacks are the last vestige of a lost cause. His point, that is obvious to anyone with about room temperature IQ, is that the people who are willing to kill others will never be dissuaded by a paperwork law. Pointing out that major crimes will never be stopped by minor inconvenience.

Truly how dare I want to know what books the school is giving my child to read!! Since all the books that are "banned" are still available at the library the only think I can take from your stance at this point is you want to make sure that liberals have full access to kids.

Thank you for admitting that simple logic is too difficult for you to understand. It is a simple question but you can't answer it.

I am wondering at what dollar amount does it make sense to move money from a 401k to a ln active money manager? My 401k has very low fees but the returns are always with 2% of the overall market. Is the right time at $100k $250k or is it more like a $1million

Some of this has to do with your age and how confident you are in high growth. The next decade is likely to be high inflation, so how much you grow is important. Losing 40% though is a lot and unlikely to be gained back unless you hit a home run each of the next set of years

So do you believe that Maddow would run the tax return without knowing if it was true, or do you believe that reporter was lying about the origin of the return? One or the other is true or is there a third option that I missing?

So you know who leaked it and they were not charged or investigated? FBI did a bang up job.

Your defense is that the journalist received the papers "innocently" which we know is false because a competent journalist would never run with something of that nature that is not confirmed. Once again a liberal says a clear lie about breaking the law but you agree to ignore it.

That leaks of Dems are investigated and the leaks that hurt Trump are not, what did you think you were responding to? Printing false derogatory information can cause you pay out money, that is simple. What information don't I know?