klos63
-
Posts
7,318 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Gallery
Profiles
Forums
Events
Posts posted by klos63
-
-
The simplest, most logical presumption is usually the correct one. Alexander was all over the field against Washington.
But then we can't make ill informed conclusions to fill up a week long post.
Everyone is guessing at what the incident could be, but the 1 game seems consistent.
and he didn't get suspended. So far, everyone is wrong.
-
Because in the dearth of information being provided about this, the only thing consistent is that it's a potential 1 game suspension. Which leads many to believe it's either bogus or not DV.
You mean , everyone is just guessing?
-
A potential 1 game suspension isn't reason to cut a guy. There's more to it than that.
Why does everyone assume a 1 game suspension? The NFL gets a lot of grief for going 'light' on domestic violence suspensions. I'm guessing if the accusation is true, it's more than 1 game.
-
Because he wont be ready....he missed all of training camp and pre season
I think Shaq Lawson is very talented and is gonna be a stude for us....but that is a lot to ask of a player
I did say "if he's ready" - I'm guessing he will be able to train a few weeks before playing in games. He'll likely rotate like most of the DL does. Maybe a bit more early on.
-
Not sure what you mean by that......given what the player is asked to do at that position I thought Lorenzo clearly outplayed Manny
My problem with this is depth......I dont want Shaq Lawson to get thrown into the fire when he returns I want him to get slowly worked onto the field splitting reps with vets.......
I really thought Manny would have been helpful here. Like I said yesterday I wonder if this all has to do with them really liking what they saw from Albright as a depth player
I really dont disagree with bills moves much but I do this one
Why not? He's a first round pick that was expected to start prior to his surgery, If he's ready, get him in there.
-
No it makes sense - cut the most experienced, versatile LB in a highly complicated defense that requires experienced, versatile LBs and doesn't have enough of them...
This is such a Bills move.
Maybe the coaches didn't think he was good enough. Everyone just annointed him as the replacement for Mario, and it just seemed odd to me. Even with Mario's crap season last year, to think Lawson would just be given the job as a suitable replacement never made any sense to me. And I like Lawson, he's a decent player.
You know, in the Ralph/Littman days, this would've been a routine cutdown day move - release a few higher-priced depth players to salvage the bottom line on the eve of the season, after most of the ticket purchases had been committed.
Now, it's really hard to say. But he's a smart, dependable edge-setter who is scheme-versatile. Not to mention, they have no linebackers for Rex's 3-4/hybrid. It seems asinine but perhaps there is more to the story.
I'd have to think that's probably not the case.
-
Makes no sense. He was our starter. We have nobody worth a crap at that position now
Unless the coaches see this differently than you do.
And you really can't say he was our starter, since he wasn't.
-
Wow, that one does hurt... he isn't even a "meh" guy, I felt he was truly an asset to this team. Even if Alexander DID outplay him, wouldn't he still have great value as a backup, vs outright cutting him? I mean, injuries DO happen, we need skilled bodies at LB in a 3-4.
not at $2.4 million, that's horrible value for a backup.
-
It is a strawman argument, because it's nowhere near the representation of what's happening in the communities. Just like you pretended that lynchings are a recent part of the landscape.
If you choose to pick falsehoods to back your argument, there's no point to continue this.
you continue to ignore your falsehood in stating Tamir had a gun, and missing the huge point that it was a toy gun, a very appropriate toy for a child. If you continue to promote false statements to support your argument , there's no point to continue this.
-
Correct, and that charity had done good work.
And that means nothing because now he waded into a turf where he hadn't done any work with and insulted a great country.
I think you have waded into a turf of race where you haven't done any work and your statements also mean absolutely nothing now.
-
Correct, and that charity had done good work.
And that means nothing because now he waded into a turf where he hadn't done any work with and insulted a great country.
I bet it still means a lot to the people that are helped by his contributions - but please continue to try to discredit anything positive that he does.
-
A lot of his charity work is done for heart disease, because his white parents lost two infants to heart disease, and he asked around to find a charity that tries to help with that. The racist, stupid ingrate.
He needs to do what he is told and then he needs to support only the charities approved of by TBD posters.
-
You like those strawmen don't you. The big question still eludes you why cops behave differently in high crime areas than in non high crime areas.
If Kaep is worried about oppression and subservience, where is his campaign against the gangs, who are far more responsible for the deaths of black youth?
No strawman argument here. This is an actual case. You asked why it is glossed over that he wasn't questioned for having a gun, you totally ignore the fact that it was a toy gun, something pretty common for 13 year olds to play with. You don't want to address that the premise of your excusing of the cops shooting is totally false.
-
Of They're not supposed to be quiet about that.
But everyone just glosees over the question of what the hell was that 13 year old playing with the gun in the first place, and what was he doing to get somebody to call the cops in the first place.
Don't address the symptom by crying about it. Address the cause. Kaep would have far more credibility with his crudade if he had a history of working with and helping the at-risk youth that he's claiming to be upset about.
Right, black kids aren't allowed to play with toy guns. And if they cop isn't sure, just drive up and shoot him in the chest. Case closed.
Of course They're not supposed to be quiet about that.
But everyone just glosees over the question of what the hell was that 13 year old playing with the gun in the first place, and what was he doing to get somebody to call the cops in the first place.
Don't address the symptom by crying about it. Address the cause. Kaep would have far more credibility with his crudade if he had a history of working with and helping the at-risk youth that he's claiming to be upset about.
Do you know for a fact that he hasn't tried to help in the community? Or just looking for another way to discredit him?
-
That was 2 years ago. Keep has been silent on that one.
Innocent kid dead, old news. Move on.
For my kids, 1960 may as well be 1492. It is in fact a very long time ago. Over 50 years.
you're making me feel old now.
-
That was 2 years ago. Keep has been silent on that one.
so basically with you , it's all in the timing. Statute of limitation on protesting?
-
I would have been far more impressed and would have regarded it as genuine. here is nothing genuine about this desperate petulant attention seeking behavior.
If you want to reference "anything's possible".
The timing and context suggest that this isn't a deep heartfelt sentiment for this kid.
Can you back up that statement with any factual evidence, or are you still just trying to discredit him any way possible.
-
Not to mention BLM
look how so many are flying off the handle about Kaep, but blacks are supposed to be quiet when cops get away with shooting a 13 year old black kid with a toy gun?
1960s were two generations ago.
fair enough, but still not too long ago. Nothing to feel too good about.
-
Lynching, as in a white community banding together to execute a black person? When?
the 60's. Get off the blogs and read a history book.
I did some quick research, only a handful in the 50's and 60's. so not too bad, but still not good.
-
Seems like the basis of Kaep's and his supporters arguments, emotions.
nice of you to edit my full statement to make it fit your argument. Do you work at Fox news?
-
Did he not feel 3 years ago that the American flag represented a country that oppressed people of color?
Maybe not as strongly as now. Lot of crap hitting the fan lately. But you don't know and you're just reaching for reasons to discredit him.
But to your point, if he did this 3 years ago, would you be ok with it?
-
!. your 99% stat proves younhave not been reading my posts very closely. You see what you want to see.
2. this is my point exactly. Keep's protest is a (very late) epiphany of convenience.
Let's all agree that if he was a NFC perennial winning QB, he would not be sitting during the anthem.
Is there a time limit on protests?
Maybe you're projecting your shallowness on him, could we all agree on that?
And they all ended two generations ago.
Which gets back to the main point of the criticism. If you applauded Kaep, please point to the institutional racism in the US that keeps any race down in 2016.
Actually Lynchings were still happening in my lifetime, and I'm not that old.
-
Sometimes my friends here influence my opinions. But not this time. I stand by what I originally posted.
Kap is disrespectful when he sits for the national anthem and disrespect is never the answer.
What would it take for you to listen to him. Should he speak on a local radio station. If you want to be heard, you need to be loud.
And honestly, I've always found it odd to be 'forced' to show your respect lest you get lambasted on blogs across the country. It's like the pledge, if my kids don't recite the pledge as they are expected to do, my guess is there will be problems. It doesn't seem right.
In your opinion.
no Sh#t
-
I won't reiterate my last 20 posts here, you can read them that will answer this question.
Also, I can't argue with made up data.
Granted, I don't have actual statistics, but I feel pretty comfortable in saying the most people with an 'R' after their name will support the police no matter what. Just watch Fox news. They have high ratings.
Manny Lawson cut
in The Stadium Wall Archives
Posted
that's my point. Nobody knows. everyone is just guessing. The most sense is that he was beat out for the job.
'nuff said.