Prickly Pete

​The Democratic "leadership team".....http://www.politico.com/story/2017/02/congressional-black-caucus-hispanic-adriano-espaillat-234575

Proud Boys https://twitter.com/GorillaRadio_Tv/status/827393757108588548

Buffalo is the perfect place for him! Haven't been to the playoffs in almost 2 decades, a crap defense, lacking WR's, a new owner, a new coaching staff...Tony's dream job.

Four. "Make America Great Again"

Not really. Across a ten year period it's often the same small group of teams going each year, so 1 QB a decade that was a backup, then traded and goes on to a Super Bowl, would be pretty good odds considering how few guys make it to the Super Bowl.

This is spot on.

I think Favre fits the criteria of the initial question. In what way do you feel he doesn't? I would say Brees kind of doesn't fit the question, because he was really a replaced starter who was then traded and had much more success. Jim Plunkett, the same.

Dr. Sack is overprescribing his bull **** with excessive threads, all along the same lines. Blocked.

I hated the Wrex Wyan hiring, but many people here loved it and were snarky and defiant towards people that didn't like it. We all said "we'll see"...we saw, and it sucked.

Every time. Or at least 999 times out of 1000.

​I agree. The Bills have sucked so long that I don't really blame the Patriots for the Bills bungling. If anything, they should be held up as proof that if you can cut down mistakes, and play smart, you can win lots of games. The offense is a machine that evolves season to season, to suit the talent, and to counter whatever teams develop to stop them. And only the most contrarian douche on this board would claim that Brady wasn't the GOAT if he were leading the Bills to such exalted heights instead of the Patriots. It's silly.

It's hard for some people to overcome their petty spite. 4-2 is obviously more accomplished.

I agree. I think he is a bit overrated, as great as he was. Best WR ever though, but not sure I would call him the Greatest Football Player Ever, as I often see claimed. I WOULD call Tom Brady the Greatest Football Player Ever. Lawrence Taylor, if you wanna eliminate QB's. True, but Brady woulda had better teammates too then, no?

Brady is making Chris Hogan look like Jerry Rice.

The Truth. You wish. I saw Montana's entire career. Brady's better.

Why not at least wait until after the combine to commit (or dismiss) to Watson, where some of his skills, and measurables can be evaluated against standards?

Ha. China would just build them up higher.

China's claims on those islands are ridiculous, and present a definite strategic threat to Malaysia, Vietnam, and the Philippines. Just conceding them would be stupid, and would likely lead to Taiwan being absorbed in the near future. What would Hillary do? What would you (as POTUS) do?

All this makes me think is "I wonder how Bernie would have handled China?" I think China would have just started redrawing the World map on Inauguration Day.

It's only a "nightmare", because the losers have been drawing out the process of losing. For instance, this thread. (I love this quote..."I'll root for his success but the lies he uses to protect his thin skin are BS." Point out a thread, where you "root" for anything he has proposed.)

Many in this forum were shifted by either hatred of Hillary, or Trump's campaign. I was one of them, and prior to that I never felt this board was weighted in any extreme, to either side or the other.

It was only a year ago that I would have sided with Baskin. I had been Left all my life, but things have just gotten ridiculous. The demographics are altering fast.

this...a small bone

Keep us posted, I'm on pins and needles about this one. Sandy Lol has been my favorite TE coach for a long time.

Trump wants nothing to do with the issue of abortion. He was forced to take some kind of position, and because he was running as a Republican, took on a half-assed "pro-life" position, and moved on. The hubbub when he said that violators of abortion laws would face some kind of punishment was way overblown. For once, Trump was caught flat footed, needed to answer that direct question, and fumbled out a vague answer. Of course, if there was any way interpret his words as "an attack on women", the media was ready to roll with it. He isn't going to pursue it strongly, only throw the religious right a few small bones (lol) for their support.