Not really actually. If we win out they would need to lose to the Fish or Bengals only in addition to us. That would flip the tiebreaker to our advantage. This is equally hard to envision.
Why else would I gave gotten so angry about a Lions/Packers game that I didn't even care about when it started?
That crap definitely changed the course of Detroit's season. There is simply a 0% chance that if the roles were reversed that the call would have been the same.
Get ready, no matter what happens for the rest of the year, to not care about being predicted to finish 3rd in the division next year behind the resurgent Jets. I'm already ready to not care about it.
I agree that McD > Jauron; Jauron takes far too much heat. Those teams were not exactly loaded with talent to do anything but what he did. We have had coaches that were far worse. Greggo, Rex and Greggo Marrone are three examples.
So Denver prefers a situation where they have no idea if their QB is going to be good to having Josh?
If the Bengals traded Dalton for Josh they would still have the#1 pick which could be traded for an untold fortune or they could trade Josh if they wanted to draft a QB; but they wouldn't do either? They prefer Dalton?
I realize he said he thought the Sabres were on a good path and just need to "fill in a few forwards" or something like that and yes that is annoying and stupid but still, your remedy seems harsh.