KRC

...but 100% of all humans are involved. Quite damning and it is far more overwhelming than the miniscule 38% quoted in the article (which is still pretty funny, considering that the article is blasting the very same thing you are advocating ). Ban all humans and you alleviate the problem. It is just that simple.

I never tried to imply that you beat your dog. I am guessing it was an isolated incident. If you took it differently, I apologize. Everything you are doing is good. We do the same thing with our dog. He must sit and stay while we are dishing out his food. We then tell him when it is OK to eat. Same with going outside, as I mentioned. Bad behavior is disciplined immediately.

Exactly right (well, except for the backhanding across the garage thingy). They will always try to test you, but you need to show them they you are the boss and you set the rules. You need to do this with every aspect of your dog's training. It even gets down to making sure that when you open a door to go out, that the dog never goes out the door first. This is a sign of domination. You need to make sure the dog sits and waits for you to go out the door and also waits for a command from you to follow you out the door. It sounds stupid and insignificant, but it goes a long way towards having a well-behaved pooch.

You seem vaguely familiar, as well.

IIRC, she was not feeling well and you took her home at half-time.

I am peeking over Paul and standing next to R. Rich. The wonderful Mrs. KRC is to my left.

You mean that reality is different from what we see on TV? Impossible.

What is it with people and not actually reading the articles they use to "back up" their claims. Here are snippets from your article: in BIG BOLD LETTERS in the FIRST PARAGRAPH: But let's just ignore that and ban the breeds. Looks like your 50% number is not correct. I won't even get into the issue that the point of view of the article is advocating the exact opposite of what you want and specifically rips your POV. The irony of that alone is hilarious.

ON...OFF...It really is not that difficult.

They attack adults, as well. We need to just ban the entire human race. It is the only way to solve the problem of dog attacks on humans.

They are all the same.

People are not supposed to remember back that far or actually hold their elected officials accountable for their votes. Haven't you learned that yet? Nothing to see here...Move along...

German Shepherds do it. Dobermans do it. Let's ban them too. How about other breeds? They also do it. Hmmm...what is the common denominator among all of this....hmmm...who trains the dogs...hmmm...HUMANS!!! That's it!!! Ban all humans and dog attacks on humans will stop.

Everytime you hear of a murder, there is always a human involved. Humans should really be outlawed. linky thingy

His English is better than most American's. I would cut him slack on that. Exactly.

I feel truly blessed to receive this honor.

Thanks. That makes me feel sooooooo much better.

How the hell did I get dragged into this?

The lighting is really not a tip-off. When using a flash, the flash bounces off the closest target and goes back to the camera. Once it gets back to the camera, it turns off. That is why when using a direct flash, you will illuminate the closest object and the background stuff is not lit as well. I see this stuff all the time with people who use flashes. Sometimes, the effect is desired. Othertimes, it looks bad (as in this case). This same effect can happen with an even shallower depth of field, so I cannot use that as the determining factor of it being fake. I would use your other analysis to determine its authenticity.

Well, if there are twinkies...

No plan is perfect.

They have an option to change back to SS at any time. They could even mix and match. One year to private accounts. Another year, SS. It is all in the little checkbox on the W-2.

Doubt it.

I agree, but you need to get around the typical scare tactics being used associated with private accounts: you could lose your money. Of course, if you keep it in SS, you will lose your money, but that is never mentioned. Congress does not want to give up SS, becuase they use it as a source of revenue for their spending. The KRC Plan: have both systems. On your W-2, there will be a checkbox to say whether you want the deduction from your paycheck to be sent in to the government for SS or whether you want it sent to a similar system to 401k. It is a good compromise. The people who want private accounts can have their private accounts. People who want to rely on SS can keep SS. You are going to create a deficit in this system, but you will create a deficit regarldess of any solution you provide. To help with this, you can increase the age to collect SS to keep it in line with the original scheme. I am against cutting benefits. To make up the rest of the deficit, you cut federal spending. Under this scheme, I see a gradual phasing out of SS. The younger generation will put their money into private accounts. As the older people start to pass away, there will be less and less people relying on SS. The program will phase itself out.

…which segues perfectly into another catchphrase: lemmings.