Jump to content

BillsFan130

Community Member
  • Posts

    11,783
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by BillsFan130

  1. Hmm I don’t know. They benched TT last year even when they were 5 and 4. I think they are ready to move on from him. You think RB in the first? I really hope not. They got a lot of holes on this team and RB is not one of them. (I do get shady is turning 30 but I don’t think they spend a high draft pick for his successor in this years draft)
  2. I really hope you are correct. Personally I would rather them draft one though as I am not sold on Cousins being a franchise guy
  3. Lol very true. And ya it definitely is still early and there are still lots of options/ lots of things that can happen
  4. As much as I as would love for the Bills to trade up and get their guy, I got a strange feeling them taking a QB in the first isn’t even close to a slam dunk. The way I see it is if the trade isn’t right for the Bills, they probably aren’t going to give away tons of draft picks to move up. At least I don’t think they will, although I’m not in Beanes brain. And if the trade isn’t right, then they would have to “settle” for probably the 4th to 6th best QB at 21, which I don’t think they would do. Next month when free agency starts, I think we will really get a better understanding if the Bills are going to go QB in the 1st round or not. If they get a guy like Keenum, I would say probably not. Cousins, definitely not. And the other options would be guys like bridgewater, Mccown, TT. (In other words, they better damn well draft a QB in the 1st if they go into the season with one of those 3 and Peterman) So what do you guys think? Do you think it’s very likely the Bills get a QB in the first, or do you think it’s more like 50/50 like myself?
  5. Very true. I do believe he’s the best draft analyst, or whatever job title you want to call him, but it seems like he rarely figures out QBs. I remember in 2011 when he said Gabbert was a sure fire QB and he was one of the top rated players on his board
  6. I agree with you as I definitely don’t think he sucks, but I would put him more in the 22 to 25 range.
  7. I would personally prefer to trade both those picks to get a QB higher. I would rather the Bills get the 1st or 2nd best QB in the draft, rather than have both the 3rd and 4th best
  8. Fair question, but I would prefer to draft a QB high in the 1st, then bring in a veteran. If they do draft 2 QBS, I wonder would it would mean for Nate Peterman? Probably cut? Unless they decide to carry 3 young QBS, but I think that would be unlikely
  9. Lol don't tell that to the Bills fans who claim he only has "2 official drops". Even his mom knows the guy cant catch lol
  10. Lol I know, was just being sarcastic. Good topic on a serious note
  11. So you’re saying peterman is not going to be elite?!
  12. Oh I agree. Was just having a little fun by asking the question. No one knows of course
  13. They are 40/1 odds to win the SB as of right now. Tied with Denver and LAC. AFC teams ahead of them are NE, PITTS, HOU, JAX, KC, OAK. So they are projected to be the 7th-9th best team in the AFC pretty much. I would consider that a dark horse personally. And I'm assuming the odds makers are predicting a healthy Luck because if they weren't, the odds would be closer to 100-1
  14. London games are awesome! Although they just cause my to sit in front of the TV for another 3 hours on Sunday lol
  15. Fair enough. I guess for myself, I watch football all day anyways. So I would rather just watch the Bills at 1, then relax and watch the 4/primetime games after. Get the stressful part out of the way first:) I just hate primetime because it never ends well for the Bills lol. I don't even know when the last time the Bills have won a Sunday or Monday nighter
  16. I hope it's 1 PM Sunday. I hate 4 PM and primetime games
  17. I think Colts are going to be a dark horse team next year if Luck is healthy. Mcdaniels and Luck should be a pretty lethal combination
  18. I personally don't care about what the national media says, but in saying that, those odds makes absolutely no sense
  19. Fair enough. I saw one post above saying Caldwell did well by taking the Lions to the playoffs, and I just mentioned he squanders talent if anything, and really doesn't maximise the talent on his teams. Does he do anything to hurt his teams? Maybe a little, but not a lot in fairness to him. Is he going to maximise the talent? I would say not even close. In other words, probably a mediocre coach, and that isn't good enough in the NFL
  20. Its a dumb question to ask why his 2nd best corner didn't start in the biggest game? He played just under 98 percent of snaps all year. That's a high percentage
  21. Colts were a very stacked team that year, and may have been undefeated if they didn't take out starters late in the regular season. As I mentioned above, they were big favourites to beat the Saints
  22. Onside kick to start the 2nd half by the Saints. Colts weren't ready for that NO was way more prepared than the Colts, and yes they executed better as well. Colts were I believe 9.5 favourites that game. They were stacked with the best QB at that time
×
×
  • Create New...