The Dean

Um, where precisely. And am I invited? You are right that language grows and develops. But in this case, "irregardless" was entered into dictionaries not because it was a new word, communicated something other words couldn't effectively communicate or was some folksy slang that became accepted. It clearly was used by idiots that didn't understand how to use "regardless" and/or "irrespective". It may be listed in the dictionary, but is usually described as a something that is NOT accepted as proper, and shouldn't be used. Take this definition for example: http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/irregardless?show=0&t=1284695819 I can see it now, the definition of "mute" will expand to include "of little or no practical value or meaning; purely academic" because so many freaking idiots don't know how to pronounce "moot". My favorite dictionary is The American Heritage Dictionary. They have a usage panel "consisting of around 200 prominent members of professions whose work demands sensitivity to language." For controversial words they tell you what percentage of the panel finds a particular word, or use of a word, acceptable. Very interesting, really. For what it's worth, The American Heritage Dictionary's online definition of "irregardless" (without Usage Panel info) is: http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/irregardless

Precisely.

Yes, I think it would probably overwhelm Hammer's lot, now that you mention it. Too bad.

Is "across the street" Hammer's lot? If so, that's a great unintended consequence for all involved. Hammer has the best lot around.

#8243 is the BEST! (Only if it is edited, though.)

If you don't have a tape deck, and only want to digitize taped audio, that's the better choice. But the U-Record does more things (you need a tape deck, turntable, etc.)

I thought it was supposed to be a STAIRWAY to heaven. I'll take the escalator, if you don't mind.

I have yet to hear about anyone's experience with Hava, but it seems like it is similar to the Slingbox, which several posters have used. Nice if you have a place in WNY to hook it up.

EDIT above. Obviously, I meant Lee beat Andre Johnson in yds and TDs that year, with JP at the helm.

2006: Lee Evans, 82 receptions, 1292 yds, 8 TDs: JP Losman his QB. Beat Carr in both receiving yards and TDs. I suppose you can put up decent #s even with a crappy QB...but it's REALLY tough when that QB is ascared to throw the ball downfield (I'm looking at YOU Trent).

Fantastic

That would be preferable to me, I think, if these seats were the only option.

Everybody's The Critic:

See, that was funny.

You might want to check your computer as well, as Fez notes. Here are the minimum requirements according to DTV: http://support.directv.com/app/answers/detail/a_id/2031/session/L3NpZC9ZYjhCT2Fhaw%3D%3D/p/813/r_id/104513/sno/0 I believe there is a tool on the site that tests your computer, too. I'm guessing the minimum isn't good enough for great HD, though.

Rubber duck?

Good point.

Just when I thought your posts couldn't get any stupider. I set the bar too low, I guess. The thing is, I can't decide which if more offensive. The comparison to a professional reporter to "uncovered meat" or the presumption that professional athletes are capable of no more self control than cats on the street.

If you have Comcast, I'm guessing you have good download speed, unless there is an issue (which happens from time to time). If you care to, check your speed here: http://speedtest.net/

What do you use for Internet, gringo? What kind of download speed you get?

Right. Sorry, the genie isn't going back into the bottle.

Unfortunately this won't help you any. But if we were back in the 70's I'd tell you to go to the Gaslight Lounge (no longer on Huron St.) to see Joe Kelly. Joe was a great entertainer and had a smoking band. The Gaslight was known for a great time. Joe also played the trumpet at the post call at Arlington park, and then for 15 straight years at the Preakness. Joe is now a drinking buddy of mine here in St. Augustine.

I can't speak for the others, but my initial reaction was, "it sucks" but I usually have issues with newly designed websites. Sometimes later I find out it's just the adjustment I had problems with, other times the site really does suck. One thing I'm fairly sure about (then and now), they did not do usability research with users/potential users.

Not this tired discussion AGAIN.

Not sure. Isn't punk something that was cool for 10 minutes in the 80s?