B-Man

The 5th Circuit Stops Democrats’ Misuse of the Voting Rights Act—and That May Shift Control of Congress by Hans Von Spakovsky In an Aug. 1 decision over redistricting of county commission seats in Galveston, Texas, the 5th Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals has issued a decision that stops the political misuse of the Voting Rights Act by Democrats and their allies to create voting districts loyal to the Democratic Party instead of protecting the voting rights of minorities. This decision may also affect the political makeup of Congress and state legislatures in Louisiana, Mississippi, and Texas—the states within the jurisdiction of the 5th Circuit—moving dozens of seats from Democrat to Republican. https://www.dailysignal.com/2024/08/02/circuit-stops-democrats-misuse-voting-rights-act-may-shift-control-congress/

Walz is WORSE than WEIRD. He is anti-parent. He has passed 3 different laws in Minnesota to change the birth sex of minor children and ask other children to come to his state to get that done. He has asked an anti-parent teacher who said parents have no rights when their kids are at school to move to his state. He locked down schools during the pandemic and now only half of Minnesota students meet reading standards — and LESS than half met math standards. Walz has been name calling people as WEIRD, but anti-parents and anti-freedom is WORSE than WEIRD. American parents need to pay attention. The most anti-parent person in the US could be the next VP.

.

Tim Walz refused to add state police resources to quell progressive rioters. He closed churches during COVID and reopened bars but refused to reopen churches. He taxes retiree social security income. He attempted an income tax hike during COVID He kept kids locked out of public schools. Under Walz, the murder rate in Minnesota jumped over 50%. But he's not Jewish.

The Left will try and control the news out of here, but it will be a stark contrast to the GOP Convention.

Thread Here: https://x.com/StarkNakedBrief/status/1820111769529880966

What it takes to be a democrat in 2024.

Defenders of Democracy Alert: Watch Jamie Raskin Say Congress Will Stop Trump Taking Office If He Wins Amy Curtis The Left hates democracy. They don't care about the will of the people, or who wins elections. If they don't win, the election is 'illegitimate' or the result of 'Russian interference.' https://twitchy.com/amy-curtis/2024/08/05/jamie-raskin-jan-6-2025-n2399260

Oh No !!! Free speech !!! UK Secretary of State Says Citizens Mad About Migrant Violence Will 'Pay the Price' for Speaking Out Amy Curtis Things are not going well in the UK. We told you last week how conservative activist Tommy Robinson was arrested on charges of 'terrorism' for showing his documentary 'Silenced' at a peaceful rally. But the problem, as always, isn't the mass migration of people who refuse to assimilate into British culture, but the native Brits who are mad about the violence and danger their politicians import and then turn a blind eye to. Those people? Like Robinson, they're 'far right' and the UK government will crack down on them (but not the roving gangs of Muslims attacking Brits, naturally): https://twitchy.com/amy-curtis/2024/08/05/uk-secretary-of-state-says-far-right-protesters-will-pay-the-price-n2399235

The Left are masters at projection. Whatever they accuse the Right of -- be it sexism, racism, anti-Semitism or violence -- they're the ones guilty of it. Kinda like when someone's significant other accuses them of cheating, because they're the actual cheaters. We all know it and see it, and yet they keep trying to pretend it's the Right that's violent. Here's The Economist doing just that: https://twitchy.com/amy-curtis/2024/08/05/economist-says-far-right-emboldened-and-ready-for-violence-n2399254 Trump was already President for 4 years. Liberal journalists need to stop inventing scare stories.

Damn Putin-loving New York Times. As War Gets Bleaker, More Ukrainians Appear Open to a Peace Deal https://www.nytimes.com/2024/07/31/world/europe/ukraine-russia-peace-mood.html

Thank you President Trump.

New York’s so-called “Equal Protection of Law Amendment” is headed for November’s ballot after a tortuous journey through the courts. On Friday, public comments on what will be listed as Proposition One closed, and the state Board of Elections moved to finalize its language. But as we can expect from Democrats — remember the deceptively named federal “Inflation Reduction Act”? — this “Equal Protection” law is anything but. The left is marketing Proposition One as critically necessary to protect abortion rights in New York after the Supreme Court’s 2022 Dobbs decision. But contrary to the fear-mongering, Dobbs did not ban abortion: It merely reminded the nation that the Constitution says nothing about abortion’s legality — leaving states free to decide their own laws. And New York state needs more abortion protection like the Sahara Desert needs more sand. New York enshrined legal abortion statewide with bipartisan support in 1970 — three years before Roe v. Wade — and reinforced it more recently. Those state laws are not affected by Dobbs one smidgen. The truth is that Prop. One originated as Democratic Party red meat for the November election. Democrats learned that Dobbs alarmism really works to drive their voter turnout, especially with affluent white female liberals. So for 2024, Democrats splattered proposals and referenda purporting to “protect abortion” on election ballots in more than half a dozen states nationwide, including New York. Here, though, Democrats took the opportunity to range far beyond abortion paranoia. If Prop. One were really about protecting abortion, one simple sentence would suffice: “Every individual who becomes pregnant has the fundamental right to choose to carry the pregnancy to term, to give birth to a child, or to have an abortion.” That’s verbatim from the state public-health law already on the books in New York. But this “abortion” amendment reads nothing like that straightforward sentence. Instead, it aims to add superfluous abortion protections — while making breathtakingly sweeping changes to state anti-discrimination statutes that have nothing to do with abortion. Prop. One’s Section A adds a whopping 11 new categories to the existing protections against discrimination on the basis of race, color, creed and religion. Only two of them touch abortion. But four of the new categories — sexual orientation, gender identity, gender expression and age — expand existing law to enshrine transgender minor “rights” in the state Constitution. Alert parents instantly recognize these code words for what they mean in our schools right now: The left is coming after our children. Meanwhile, Section B is the proposition’s knock-out punch. It says any and all of the discriminations banned in Section A are permitted if such discrimination is done to “prevent or dismantle” another discrimination. It basically adds to the state Constitution that much-ridiculed quote from racism trafficker Ibram X. Kendi: “The only remedy to past discrimination is present discrimination. The only remedy to present discrimination is future discrimination.” https://nypost.com/2024/07/28/opinion/nys-faux-abortion-amendment-is-a-sneaky-leftist-wishlist/

Don't forget in 2023

DEMOCRAT CIVIL WAR WATCH: Fetterman Warns Kamala About Picking Josh Shapiro. In a rather stunning development in the Kamala Harris veepstakes, Sen. John Fetterman (D-Pa.) is reportedly concerned about Harris selecting his state's governor, Josh Shapiro, as her running mate. According to Politico, three individuals familiar with the discussions have revealed that Fetterman's advisers have privately communicated these concerns to Harris' team. https://pjmedia.com/matt-margolis/2024/08/04/democrat-civil-war-watch-fetterman-warns-kamala-about-picking-shapiro-n4931331 .